Jump to content

Ag with kids

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ag with kids

  1. It's amusing that this post of mine got 4 neg reps. I guess they don't wan't all people that do illegal things to suffer consequences...or they want the law to only work in one direction. Odd....
  2. Ummm...does the guy not realize that's a quote from the CDC that was included in the draft opinion?
  3. "He"? Who are you talking about?
  4. Yes. Those are all fucking wrong. Why do want the law to only work one direction? I don't. I want ALL people that do illegal things to suffer consequences.
  5. Anyone that actually broke the law, yes I do. But...then, you must also be on my side, right? If these protesters broke the law (which according to the statute they did) you want them arrested too, right? You know, law and order...
  6. Yes. But, right now it is the law, right? But, do we really want this to be the standard? What if the final opinion came out and they DON'T overturn RvW. Would you support anti-abortion advocates going to the houses of the Justices that upheld it? You know as well as I do that what they're doing right now is threatening. And it would be threatening if anti-abortion people showed up at the justices that upheld RvW.
  7. Read the statute. "resorts to any other demonstration" I'm glad y'all are back to supporting freedom of speech though. Elon will be happy with y'alls conversion.
  8. Or "resorts to any other demonstration"... They don't have to do any of those things. That's the catchall.
  9. Then why are they there? Just to call him a dick? They chant "we will not go back" over and over. Is that not an attempt at influence? Or "resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence"? This looks like the catchall for this. Look. Doxxing is wrong. And going to the personal residences of people in government (or anyone else) is wrong. I don't care who does it, right or left.
  10. Breaking the law isn't important?
  11. Interdasting. Since the protest was against the law, they now have someone to prosecute. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section1507&num=0&edition=prelim First rule of breaking the law is STFU.
  12. Any conservatives that think this is good are dumb as shit and need to be punished to the full extent of the law.
  13. I think they make those for South Austin's mom...
  14. So...adding punitive tax rates directly on a small group of people isn't intended to do that? smdh...
  15. Well...using the standard dictionary definition...they ARE persecuted... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/persecute And right on this thread they're being shamed and denigrated... So....perhaps revise your interpretation...
  16. Umm...I've had to explain the meaning to numerous posters in here. And...the example I gave was to illustrate the point of what I posted. JFC...y'all give me tired head.
  17. Mildly poor interpretation, but it's still closer than wildcats... And I'm a TWOhundredaire, thank you.
  18. Just because advanced reading comprehension is beyond your grasp does not mean that I did what you're claiming. But, if I can find 5 Jewish people in Corpus, I'll ask them. I think my odds will be low, though. Most people here are Catholic.
  19. I didn't. I'm sorry you're too slow to understand that.
  20. I don't care who did it, I think the NIL will affect college football in a negative way that most fans won't like.
  21. I don't think so... But, if it's something you think should happen, then I have no problem with you advocating for that position and working to enact policy that does that.
  22. Seriously? Sigh....your post asked him why he cared since it wouldn't personally affect him. If someone thinks that doing X (in this case "jacking up the highest tax rate") is a bad thing to do for the country and economy, even though it might not personally affect them immediately, then they should disagree with and work to prevent X, otherwise they are abdicating their person responsibility. The whole point of Niemoller was to advise future generations to NOT do what he did... Why is this such a difficult concept???
  23. Fair enough...And I will agree with you on his posts. He IS smart...that's obvious. FWIW, his use of the quote was a HUGE graphic... As to "First they came..." I think it's a powerful way to show how you should alway do what's right, even if you don't really gain anything personal from it, because not doing what's right can potentially have really bad results. That's how I've taken the message of it...to me it extends far further than just the immediate issue it was referring to... BTW...thanks for keeping the discussion civil. I appreciate that.
  24. Because the message in the poem wasn't just about what Niemoller didn't do in the lead up to WWII. It's about not abdicating personal responsibility solely because the effects of an act won't have immediate personal repercussions.
×
×
  • Create New...