Everything posted by Ag with kids
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Now do the Keystone Pipeline and the O&G industry during the last adminstration...
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I have stayed on topic. Bozo sucked me in here to discuss gerrymandering and apportionment of districts. That is the ONLY reason I'm here.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
CA congressional representation is 83-17 Democrat. CA voted 59% Harris, 38% Trump.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I REPLIED to posts. I didn't "come in here" But, I'll leave you to your echo chamber...
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I only made 2. I bought the rest. You can go to the courthouse, give them money and they make them yours. It's called adoption...I adopted 7. Late wife's 3 and her brother's 4. This is the worst/best pullout game of all time...
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I have 21 grandkids with number 22 on the way... Dudes...what don't you understand about NINE kids... AND...AGAIN...I am only on this thread because Bozo goaded me on here... I don't post first. I don't even want to be here. But, then, I have a couple Old Fashioneds...
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Fuck. I don't even know what this thread is about. Bozo just sucked me back in here. Wait. That sounds bad. For him. Just for him.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
gerrymandering
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Explain how I'm hateful. Or is it that viewpoints that don't fit your echo chamber upset you?
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I do have 9 kids. Which is probably a larger number than the times than you've seen live titties outside of a strip club.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Oh bullshit. They still have the state offices. And the local offices. And Weatherford/Parker county has been represented by Kay Granger for at least 20 years... The federal voting in Parker County is around 60-40. Still heavily Republican. So, they're still getting a good amount of the policies that they want. I lived there for 20 years. Other than my liberal friends there, they were happy with the representation for the most part. You're never going to get 100% of what you want.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I'm just replying to people. Tell them to stop.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I at least know what a woman is.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
No but I've launched my cat a number of times when it was pissing me off. Dog's too heavy. Plus, dog actually has remorse-ish
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I have REPEATEDLY stated that the way they do those stupid districts sucks. I'm not arguing for fucked up salamander districts. But, "communities of interests" are not these homogenous entities that you seem to be making them out to be. Parker County/Weatherford DOES have those rural interests. But, it's also VERY conservative and votes about 80% Republican. They have many interests in common with NON-rural conservatives. "Communities of interest" aren't ONE THING. They should have Republican representation because that's the policies the people there support. I'm all for drawing the districts in a much less retarded manner, BUT ensuring that the majority of the people in each district gets the representation that matches their views. Now, if you want to expand the number of people in Congress, you could probably get a better representation of the smaller "communities of interest". But, with only 38 people representing 31.2 million people, you can't subdivide the districts up to make everyone happy. Couple that with the requirement that there has to be a certain number of majority minority districts and that complicates the equation.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
It's actually Aerospace Engineering. But, carry on...
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Here's a Venn diagram that is representative of the various "communities of interest" in generic state/county/city/rural area X. Tell me your plan to apportion each state/county/city/rural area to ensure that the majority of each state/county/city/rural area of generic state X gets representation that most closely aligns with their views.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I've answered your fucking question numerous times over the past 20 years. I'm sorry you haven't likedmy answer. Can't help you there. When you're not doing DIRECT DEMOCRACY (which is a HORRIBAD idea), you have to try to find the highest correlation between citizen political views and representative political policies. Sucks that parties tend to fill that criteria, but here we are.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I posted earlier that CA has gerrymandered their political districts to be 83% Democratic for Congress even though the state as a whole voted only 59% Democratic for POTUS. Would you find it fair if Texas did the same for the GOP? I lived in Parker County for 20 years. It was about 85% Republican. That was the county "community of interest". So, why not make the entire state of Texas mirror that? Bozo would call that a great way to represent the "communities of interest".
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
I've pointed out that CA votes much less Democratic than their districts are drawn. Apparently, they have lots more "communities of interest" that the citizens of the state don't realize they need.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
2024 GOP PLATFORM
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Do you even understand federalism and how representatives work? Because it appears you don't. You're trying to get the representation to be as close as possible to the views of the constituents. Parties as proxies tend to yield a good correlation. Can you name a better proxy to get the representation of the area closer to the makeup of the electorate?
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Yeah. And amazingly, that methodology will closely align by party. Since you can't do the apportionment based on individual candidates for every single election in every single district/precinct/etc.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
You do realize that the apportionment for federal offices, state offices, and local offices can be different, right? Then, please explain exactly how you would apportion representation at the federal, state, and local levels without any reference to political parties/policies/platforms as a proxy for the representation.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Sure. I agree 100%. But... The odds are generally that the candidate that you support is a member of a specific party that you also tend to support (or that the other candidates that you support belong to). Most Democratic candidates espouse policies consistent with the Democratic Party political platform. Most Republican candidates espouse policies consistent with the Republican Party political platform. Most people lean one way or the other...very few people are truly in the center (the true center, not the "mainstream" center). You have to apportion the seats in Congress, state legislatures, and local areas SOMEHOW. Please explain how you would do it so that the largest amount of people get representation from representatives that share their policy beliefs that does not use any kind of political party as a proxy.