Jump to content

Ag with kids

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ag with kids

  1. Cool. Your neg rep took me to negative 1. You'll be such a hero in the circle jerk.
  2. The Secret Service moved him there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests_in_Washington,_D.C.#May_29 The White House was on lockdown the night of May 29 in response to protests reaching the gates.[2] The protests began at 7:00 p.m. By 8:30 p.m., the White House lockdown was lifted as protesters began to leave. At 10:00 p.m., the protesters returned, however by 3:30 am Saturday the protesters were more subdued. The protesters came into conflict with the United States Secret Service. At one point the protesters were pepper sprayed.[3] Protesters reportedly threw "bricks, rocks, bottles, fireworks and other items"[4] as well as "rocks, urine and alcohol"[5] at Secret Service agents injuring over 60 of them, including 11 hospitalized and treated for non-life-threatening injuries.[6] As a result of the protests, the Secret Service rushed President Donald Trump to shelter in the White House underground bunker, where he remained for almost one hour.[7][8] This occurred after some protesters crossed temporary barricades set up near the Treasury Department buildings. Around that time, the Secret Service alert level was raised to "red". The president's wife and son were also brought to the bunker.[9] Trump later falsely claimed that he had only gone to the bunker for an "inspection", and also claimed that he was in the bunker "for a tiny, little short period of time".[10][11] Attorney General William Barr later stated that the May 29 protests "were so bad that the Secret Service recommended that the President go down to the bunker".[12]
  3. a) 5/29/2020 there was a violent attack on the White House that injured 60 Secret Service Agents - they didn't breach the perimeter because the WH is a LOT more protected than the Capitol Building. But, it was bad enough that the Secret Service evacuated the POTUS to the bunker for safety. There was very little coverage of this. And yet all the current criteria being used to define a "violent attack" or an "insurgency" was present that during that event. Actually, it was much worse. Since the people trying to breach the WH perimeter were throwing rocks, bricks, bottles, and other projectiles during their attack. II) As to the Russian collusion issue...I'd say that trying to overthrow the POTUS from INSIDE the government is probably worse. Lying to the FBI, using fake documents to get FISA warrants, etc. That scares me much more that a bunch of dumbasses trying to do dumbass things (I'm including 5/29). Just remember...You're happy because this was done to Trump. But - maybe next time it will be YOUR POTUS that this happens to.
  4. Seems circle jerk is yours...
  5. No. I actually spent some time with my family for awhile and now I'm on a business trip after traveling all day. YAY! Orlando...yet again. But...My short foray back into surly CR has shown that my previous views of it being basically a Burnt Orange DemocraticUnderground with added TDS are not incorrect... If @PenelopeWitherspoon would just let me quit renting space in her head (I'd love to BTW), I'd have lost about 70% fewer rep points. But...oh well. Hey...If you want CR to be nothing more than a liberal circle jerk, that's cool. I've avoided 99% of the threads because that's all they appear to be. I just thought I'd try to offer a differing view on things - outside of the circle jerk. Well. Whatever and carry on gentlemen and ladies...
  6. And yet you negged me 5 times after you posted this. It's cool.
  7. I think that's all great advice. And I try to live like that. In fact, I lost my temper yesterday with one poster so I'd like to formally apologize to @hobbes2702 for saying "fuck you" to him. No matter what, I try to be respectful, but I wasn't then. Mea Culpa.
  8. I thought you were older...but, nice selfie I guess.
  9. Cool... @PenelopeWitherspoon Neg repped me 31 straight times. That's gotta be some kinda record or something. That's some serious rent free living.
  10. I haven't lied. So fuck you. And Fuck you for making me say fuck you.
  11. Insults are the weapons of children... Polite discourse is the weapon of men... Taco Bell is the weapon of toilets...
  12. Yeah. You post insults and I posts data and replies
  13. I posted my answer to that question...go look for it.
  14. Since I've had the same problem of having shit tons of responses to my posts, I'm sure that you missed my response to this post....because I've already responded to it. I'm guessing page 13/14 but I wasn't really counting...
  15. I'm a fucking old... I WAS alive back then. I had just got divorced from my hot, but cheating hoar of a wife and remarried to an awesome woman and got a lot of kids from her. RIP Stacey! Rush is my favorite band. Rush was "interesting". He was pretty much the "voice" of conservatives for years. I watched his TV show a few times back in the mid 90s - pre FOX NEWS (for you haters).
  16. Everything you've just posted is a lie. I just pointed it out. Prove me wrong.
  17. Fuck you. Stop fucking accusing me of lying or point out my LIES. Damn. You're just an asshole. I don't mind debating with the vast majority of the posters on here because even though they have different positions, they're decent people with differing views. I can respect that. You? Not so much.
  18. I think all of them were politically motivated and both reasons you stated for them are completely wrong. a) The Clinton impeachment was because he committed perjury. Sure. It was about a blowjob, but that "is" what it "is"...(let's see who gets that) b.1) Which Trump impeachment - you need to clarify. I was actually surprised there weren't more. But, the Pandora's Box was open....
  19. JFC. Ok. He was "impeached" 5 days before the end of his term as POTUS. You got me. I wonder why that doesn't end the entire process... The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. Which impeachment of a POTUS did not involve that part? Is THAT why y'all have the corncob up your ass? Fine. You won a technical debate point. Can I subtract 40 points from y'all for all the negs I got because y'all disagree with me? Yeah...probably not - aggy, racist, fascist, nazi, LIAR (thanks hobbs, you have a special place in my heart) and all that.
  20. I fucking told you why each of them were impeached. JFC. READ. I posted everything in English.
  21. What. Lies? State EXPLICITLY the lies. If you can't do that, then why to YOU keep lying about my posting?
  22. Oh God...he's so fun. He's like 4chan. Weaponized autism...
  23. So...you're saying that the criminal court is part of the process of indictments?
  24. The entire process for BOTH impeachments was partisan. The Democrats in the House employed the process for political reasons. And if you're going to try to play silly games, then, yes. The first impeachment WAS bipartisan. Two and three Democrats voted with ALL Republicans against the impeachment articles. That's the bipartisan criteria you're using, right? If a small number of the opposing party votes for something even though it's passed by overwhelming support by the nominating party? Now, a question for YOU...Was the impeachment of Clinton partisan or bipartisan?
×
×
  • Create New...