Jump to content

Ag with kids

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1522
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ag with kids

  1. I think all of them were politically motivated and both reasons you stated for them are completely wrong. a) The Clinton impeachment was because he committed perjury. Sure. It was about a blowjob, but that "is" what it "is"...(let's see who gets that) b.1) Which Trump impeachment - you need to clarify. I was actually surprised there weren't more. But, the Pandora's Box was open....
  2. JFC. Ok. He was "impeached" 5 days before the end of his term as POTUS. You got me. I wonder why that doesn't end the entire process... The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. Which impeachment of a POTUS did not involve that part? Is THAT why y'all have the corncob up your ass? Fine. You won a technical debate point. Can I subtract 40 points from y'all for all the negs I got because y'all disagree with me? Yeah...probably not - aggy, racist, fascist, nazi, LIAR (thanks hobbs, you have a special place in my heart) and all that.
  3. I fucking told you why each of them were impeached. JFC. READ. I posted everything in English.
  4. What. Lies? State EXPLICITLY the lies. If you can't do that, then why to YOU keep lying about my posting?
  5. Oh God...he's so fun. He's like 4chan. Weaponized autism...
  6. So...you're saying that the criminal court is part of the process of indictments?
  7. The entire process for BOTH impeachments was partisan. The Democrats in the House employed the process for political reasons. And if you're going to try to play silly games, then, yes. The first impeachment WAS bipartisan. Two and three Democrats voted with ALL Republicans against the impeachment articles. That's the bipartisan criteria you're using, right? If a small number of the opposing party votes for something even though it's passed by overwhelming support by the nominating party? Now, a question for YOU...Was the impeachment of Clinton partisan or bipartisan?
  8. If I put all the far left liberals on ignore here in the CR, It would be me doing nothing more than posting: MARCO POLO And...yet another insult. Insults the arguments of children. But, keep using them if it makes you feel better.
  9. Article 1 Section 2 The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment. Section 3 The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. There is an impeachment PROCESS. Without the Senate part of the PROCESS, impeachment is just a petulant act by the House. All of the POTUS impeachments have been been bullshit political attacks. Johnson, Clinton, Trump 1 & 2. The good thing is that Section 3 of Article 1 helps to prevent the stupidity of the House... This is not rocket surgery...
  10. What are the "lies" in that post? Please don't include differences in opinions/views/etc. And what would be the lie about illegals spreading covid? It's been widely reported that most of the people that have illegally crossed the border have not been tested for covid before being released. That's several hundred thousand people. FWIW, if you - a US Citizen - cannot enter the US from another country without providing CBP with a negative Covid test performed in the last 72 hrs, why would that not be the standard for anyone coming across the southern border? It's been stated by the US government that the purpose of requiring those 72 hr negative covid tests are to stop the spread of covid....
  11. I'm a deist, so I don't believe I'll be worrying about purgatory...
  12. The actual Democratic Party tried to remove a POTUS so that the results of the last election were null and void. Then, a subset of a bunch of dumbasses tried to do the same thing after the next election. Both groups were stupid. However, one is still in control of two thirds of the government.
  13. No I haven't. You stating that I've lied doesn't make it true, no matter how important you think your opinion is.
  14. Damn. And I took you for a Democrat. Mea culpa.
  15. I pointed out it was the Impeachment that the Democratic Party used. Why should I respond to any of those demands when I haven't posited them? I appreciate your strawman attempts, but don't really feel like responding to them.
  16. You're cute. At least this is a better insult than all the other posters who just toss out garbage insults. This one took some Google Fu. I can appreciate that.
  17. I do it all the time. Sorry that you disagree with me. Is this where you call me a racist, fascist, nazi?
  18. The Senate part is still part of the impeachment process...
  19. No. Just wanted to do other things. After watching the Cowboys, though, I would have been better off just doing this shitshow...
  20. Who said rapid slide? Boiling the frog takes time...
  21. Over throw the government? No. Overthrow the results of the 1996 election, sure. And I thought it was a completely stupid thing for them to do and opened a Pandora's Box. Impeachment is actually supposed to be a serious thing, no a political thing. The GOP fucked up there and now we had the Dems do TWO fucking impeachments, including one of a private citizen. I guess you don't know much about me after all...
  22. The Moody's smoked turkey was perfect. Just a light smoke flavor, but still tasted like turkey.
  23. You don't contribute much here other than insults from what I've seen. At least I've discussed issues. Have fun with all that hate.
×
×
  • Create New...