Why would anyone give a shit about Steve in Nebraska, unless he is in District 2. There are plenty of Steves in LD2 who give a shit about Israel/Gaza. (I was Tuco Nebraska CD2 until four years ago. There are plenty of people who care about Gaza.)
Let's talk some more about the reasoning and mechanics here and you can present a solution. A few things I understand about "LatinX"
1. It's not a Latino/Latina/Hispanic/Chicano movement. It's a feminist movement, or a byproduct of the feminist movement. Feminists are pushing for more gender neutral language. There are feminists who are in the "Latino" community who don't want to be defined by a masculine adjective. And there are feminists outside of the Latino community who will support them.
2. Anytime you push for cultural changes, you will inevitably get pushback. When we started using "work-hours" instead of "manhours" in proposals, there were some people who scoffed at it. But, at work, you get paid. So, yeah, it will offend some Latinos. That's not a shock to anyone.
3. I'm willing to bet the "Texas Young Democrats Latinx Caucus" was started by people at the local level who are invested in both Latino and feminist causes. This was not something handed down from the national party or lobbyists in Washington.
So, what do you do if you are Party leadership? Do you tell feminists to store their shit, that their cause needs to be backburnered for the next twenty years or that you simply don't believe in their cause? Do you tell that people who are actually showing the fuck up, volunteering their time, and working to get voter registered that they are in the wrong Party?
My recommendation:
A. Show the fuck up. Go to your local Party meetings and work to both understand the different factions and influence the overall group direction with your more centrist views (and votes). Nobody is going to change the dynamics at the local level by complaining about Schumer or whoever you consider the "leadership" of the Democratic Party is.
B. Work to convince voters that they should vote for their interests rather than against their annoyances. There is no reason to believe the Latino community will be particularly feminist. We need to get them to vote for the Latino interests. There is no reason to believe the black community will be particularly pro-gay. We need to get them to vote for Black interests. There is no reason to believe gay people will be pro-progressive tax policies. We need to get them to vote for gay interests.
Unfortunately I think that has become more challenging in the outrage-culture of social media. There is always something to be pissed about, and that is were Republican messaging it targeting. I also think it more difficult to explain the reasoning behind different issues, which might be annoying people, when you have to do it a one second scroll-by ad. I