Jester

I just got one for the 22nd. Probably just going down the LHF donor list.

Boom! Or bust.

Dude. They stormed the capitol where our nation's elected officials were, including the VP. Then they tried to break into secure/barricaded rooms housing those same people. In any other situation I'd agree with you. Not this one.

Reminds of the scene in a Bronx tale. “I’ll tell you we when leave!” (Door locks) “Now yous can’t leave”.

Of course he won't. We all know that. He's a troll. Nothing more. Nothing less.

This. And I’m really not looking forward to the handwringing from the LDE folks on why we should keep him for beating lowly Colorado. At best this game just confirms the waste of what this year was with Herman and the helm.

I vote “pink sock” or “$38 worth of hamburger meat aka fisterman’s asshole”.

Is that how we're referring to futureman's asshole now? Or was there an actual bet over hamburger meat?

How about you just shut up then?

fake. misspelled corches. *now that I think about it... all that big dick energy probably threw off their spellings and whatnot. It's real.

I'm really looking forward to Urban coming in 2021 and then you claiming that you just helped keep it quiet as to not ruin the super duper secret plan. Then futureman will be forced to fist himself to a live audience of 3 (I'm guessing subliminal horn and 2 drunk degenerates that accidentally clicked on the link). 2021 is going to be great.

This. Chip Brown is a piece of shit and is rarely correct with any of his 'reporting'. He just throws shit out for clicks.

Ya. If that happens it falls to one of the coordinators for a lame duck year. It won't be Herman either way.

I ain't voting for Kelly. Because I don't want to watch the world burn. But Jimmy has been shit for my neighborhood. No one likes Kelly, but they are likely going to vote for her despite knowing about her past and posting history on the shag. She might actually have a chance here. Which scares the shit out of me.

This. But he uses a thesaurus when posting to sound smart and try to throw people off.

I see no harm in letting them try. then they'll lose the senate altogether.

holy shit. lol. the comments on this 'hearing' is insane.

That or South Austin's mom. I'd still put my money on Ray.

Same. I keep being told that they are going to use the 25th on Biden and that was Pelosi's plan all along in trying to create a bi-partisan panel (iirc) concerning a determination of the president being 'fit for office'. It's lunacy.

when do we get the 'I hereby pardon myself for all federal AND state crimes!!!' tweet? then, and only then, will we know it is over.

Agreed. The states should change the rules. But in this specific circumstance (for what the opinion is based on), they didn't. The courts changed it after a challenge. Kavanaugh seems to be vesting the rights to change election laws with the state legislature, and not the courts. I think that is pretty much in line with what I would expect from him and other conservatives, this pandemic and unique circumstances you reference above be damned. Problem is obviously where the state legislature is controlled by republicans = no changes. I think the part to focus on in Kavanaugh's concurrence is 'or as soon as possible thereafter.' That could mean a day, 3 days, a week, etc. based on each state's rules. Note, there aren't challenges to laws where state legislatures have different rules (for instance, Texas allows for the receipt of mail in ballots up to 24 hours after the election date). He referenced a few other states doing the same or having deadlines even further out. The key there is that the legislature enacted those rules, not the courts after a challenge. I think the problem here is more-so with the state legislature(s) than the opinion itself.

Look. I hate Kavanaugh, but that isn't what he said. Seems like fear mongering to me. Now, that's not to say Kavanaugh won't attempt something shady as hell if this ends up in the Supreme Court, but to infer that Kavanaugh claimed 'that states announce the winner on an election night' based on these excerpts is incorrect. Caveat: I didn't read the full concurrence. Just what was in the original Phillip tweet.

Her Twitter tonight is pretty complimentary of Harris. You gonna post all those tweets or nah?

Registered. Think it drives the point home. Whether you go back to that party or not is irrelevant.

TLDR: fuck term limits for SC Justices. Lifetime appointment is the one thing that keeps the SC honest. Look. A good judge is a good judge. They don’t let politics into play. They apply the law. To. The. Facts. I know. Novel concept, right? I’ve been in front of great “republican” judges and great “democrat“ judges. Then those great judges get washed out in the next blue/red wave for no reason. It sucks and I wish judges didn’t have run on a political ticket. If there are term limits...the SC is gonna be a grifter factory. “Hey, rule this way and in 10 years and I’ll put you in the board of company X paying Y million a year”. It would be fucking terrible