Jump to content

hornbri

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hornbri

  1. Getting excited for our trip next weekend. Arrive Thursday about 7pm and leave Sunday afternoon. The plan for food is:

    Thursday - Peche (walk in and hope to sit at bar)

    Friday - Breakfast Red Slipper Cafe,  Lunch Drago's or Acme (I like them both), Dinner at Restaurant R'evolution

    Saturday - Lunch from Central Grocery, Dinner at Commanders Palace 

    Sunday - Brunch at Arnaud's

    I only go about once a year and wish I had more time. That is just about all the food I can fit in a weekend. Will need to diet for a month afterwards. 

     

    • Like 1
  2. 8 hours ago, Surly Bevo said:

     It’s not hard. Both schools need to win out. Assuming that they win out they have a loss to Texas (and perhaps a win over Texas if we are the champ game opponent).

     

    If we win out we have a loss to MD.

     

    Between those two who has the better “loss”

     

    And that’s why given the fact we both have to win out they still have the easier path if they do it than we do.

     

     

     

    The point is both schools cannot win out! If we win out we have 1 loss and they have a min of 2 losses (either to us again or someone else along the way that prevented them from going to the CCG). 

  3. 2 hours ago, Surly Bevo said:

    OU has an easier path to the playoffs on paper than we do...think about that before getting too excited.  

    While I don’t think we will make the playoffs this statement does not make sense  

    If we both win the rest of the scheduled games we play again. In that scenario, at this point, you would say we have the upper hand since we already showed we could beat them.

    It feels like half this board keeps forgetting two out of WV, OU, and Texas are going to have to play each other twice. 

  4. 5 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

    Do you think it’s fucked up that those women don’t give a shit that a potential Supreme Court Justice tried to rape someone?

    I think its fucked up that you don't say "allegedly" tried to rape someone. You are so convinced it happened it is as crazy as those that are so convinced there is no way it ever happened. 

  5. 1 minute ago, Pig Bellmont said:

    McConnell already on record he will plow through the confirmation. I just can’t see them calling it off. 

    Pence also said today it is going to happen. They are circling the wagons here and barring some huge change when/if she testifies next week this is happening. 

  6. 1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

    I investigate things for a living.

    I would speak to her therapist (with her permission/release). 

    I would speak to other people she identified as being at the party (not all of them, but the ones who would seem likely to have relevant information).

    I would speak to any other person who she identifies who might have relevant information.

    I would speak to Kavanaugh.

    I would speak to anyone who HE identifies who might have relevant information.

     

    If your interview of a person is "do you allege that he assaulted you?  You got any proof?", then you're the worst fucking investigator in the world.

    That is fine, but I was responding to the "question the other witnesses" part. I agree those are relevant parties that could be talked to, of course any FBI investigation is going to start by questioning her. 

  7. 1 minute ago, Dertyberd said:

    Lulz.  The FBI would go out and question the other witnesses.  The committee isn't going to subpoena or question any of the other relevant people.  That's a big difference.  It's a crime to lie to the FBI, which they still convict people for.  It is technically is a crime to lie to Congress, but we've seen that no longer matters.  

    What other witnesses? 2 of the 3 people are already being asked to testify, I guess they could ask the Judge guy to come in and I think he in fact would. 

  8. 4 minutes ago, sachick said:

    Actually, she wants the FBI to investigate. If not, she may want it public so she doesn't have to repeat her story or so that EVERYONE hears it coming from here so there is no doubt of what she said. And if these senators are so insistent on there not being an FBI investigation because the Judicial Committee can handle it, then the Judicial Committee should handle it. You want to ask her what she was wearing or if she had been drinking, then do so face to face.

    They are going to pretty much ask what the FBI would ask. 

    When and where did this occur? Were there any other witnesses that can back this up? Any other proof? If the answer to all that is I don't know and No then they are done, there is no way anyone could investigate more as there is no where to go. 

×
×
  • Create New...