Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    42529
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

TwiceHorn last won the day on August 3

TwiceHorn had the most liked content!

Reputation

44021 Surly 1%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think if it could be proven that a signature on an operative document, EO, legislation, etc. was executed without POTUS's knowledge and consent, that would be a problem, whether an Autopen was involved or straight forgery. But, that would require some form of proof and adjudication, not some deranged demented shitgibbon ranting about it. I think it would have to come up in a judicial challenge to the legislation, which would have to be brought by a party with standing to challenge it.
  2. This is another one of those things that isn't actually regulated by much law. As with many things, it relies on the good faith and restraint of the executive.
  3. They/he was announced as the architect pretty much from the get-go, definitely before the demo. I remember because I looked him up and he seemed credible. But he should have known he was working for a grimy little pimp and that the "visions" would diverge. I suppose the notion of working on an historic project was too tempting.
  4. In nine months in appointed office, she racked up 10 ethics charges and resigned. https://fox59.com/indianapolitics/brauns-former-secretary-of-public-safety-accused-of-ethics-violations/ But I'm sure that's just wEApoNiZAtiON! From a GOP administration, of course.
  5. She seems like a cunt.
  6. What's funny, though, is those two cars, and quite a few others, are sedate kind of things one might actually buy for their kids thinking them safe.
  7. Also, this baffles me, she hired her paramour at $250/hour. I think the last hourly lawyer Paxton hired was at $1250/hour. Low-quality grifting.
  8. They don't care about pollution, or worker safety, or really much else except the cheapest possible option.
  9. Well, one thing I have noticed because I don't really care for video content over written, is that those Paul/Ian things really only do maybe a half dozen plays, tops, so it's not that deep a dive. So they select representative stuff. Or whatever they can use to bolster or explain their theories. Other sites put up a video and if its run time is more than about 40 minutes, I nope out of it. Also, over the years, it seems Scipio doesn't really wade into the obvious problems like Arch's performance or the kind of silliness like who should start. Wadlington has his white whales, like s/c, and other opinions/theories too, that he sticks to. But I enjoy him for the most part. Enjoy your stuff, too.
  10. I guess that's youtube subs? Kinda hope that's not site subscribers. I'm not a member of any site now, except this one, but have been kind of an IT fan going back to Robert Heard and the paper newsletter. I was even a mod there for a while. I'd like to think it's holding its own.
  11. The point is, I believe, that Scip has never relied on access to the program. He's never purported to be an insider. His deal is analysis and opinion, and a certain writing style that's a bit less evident on the videos.
  12. Which way is up though? Who's the dick and who's the asshole?
  13. I just mean she and her office did some good work. The RICO thing might have been brilliant. At the same time, roughly, she was hosting fundraisers against a potential defendant, and hiring her paramour as a special prosecutor. Not self-dealing, per se, but galactically stupid under the circumstances.
  14. Perhaps not coincidentally, my freshman year. Sorry, y'all.
  15. And those losses against better-rounded teams were so, so demoralizing. Generally much worse than what you're seeing now. Losing a volleyball game usually means the system breaks down, passing deteriorates, and you look like dooky. But it was so bad back then.
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...