Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    42490
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. As does "lickspittle."
  2. This is kind of a lawdog thing, but justsecurity has compiled a listing of bullshit stunts the DOJ has pulled in federal courts, lies, dissembling, changing stories. https://www.justsecurity.org/120547/presumption-regularity-trump-administration-litigation/#_Toc214438844
  3. They're both grumpy looking sonsabitches, that's for sure.
  4. Would be a fun exercise in witness examination. In fact, something like this is often used in a trial advocacy course. Lead the cop into admitting that the only cause he had for the stop was speeding. See what evidence he has of speeding, then bust him up with the GPS thing.
  5. Ben Wittes on point at Lawfare. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-situation--not-the-way-i-wanted-this-to-end Let me be candid: This is not the way I wanted these cases to end. Comey and James are, as best as I can discern, factually innocent of these indictments, which were brought maliciously by a woman acting at the direct behest of a president who hates the defendants. There is something mildly unsatisfying about the court’s resolving their two cases on the basis of merely one of the myriad procedural outrages that were all just mosaic tiles in a much larger abomination: the president’s abuse of the criminal process to go after those who displease him. It misses a very large forest for a single proverbial tree. I know he's buddies with Comey and Richman and some of you long time political perverts have beef with him, but on Trumpco CJ issues, he's righteous.
  6. It was top competition, but yeah, we had em. And, I gotta say, it's better than the old days when about all we had was a front row and if you could defend and block that, we were done.
  7. Could be and maybe Busboom isn't Satan, er, John Cook. But I have respect for Corn that borders on fear. Big 10 doesn't seem to be quite what it used to be, though.
  8. Possibly. It's not a slam dunk. Cop will probably lie.
  9. Not historically. Last couple of years they've been young, like we are now. Maybe a Busboom thing (I know it's Busboom Kelly, but plain Busboom is more fun).
  10. We can't play even remotely like that against Corn.
  11. Get your shit together, ladies
  12. Now imagine if we were going home for the year. Fuck.
  13. Ok fuck that horns down huddle shit. Eat my ass, bitches.
  14. Fucked the sweep and going 5.
  15. Give em the business!
  16. Fuck yes, ladies!
  17. Fuck yes, ladies!
  18. Can you say ataxia class? I knew you could!
  19. Almost forgot about this.
  20. The existence of Michael Flynn as an OF-8 in the United States Army and appointed to DIA and briefly as NSA scares the living fuck out of me about the military. That he rose to those levels without the assistance of MAGA is /TORBUSH
  21. I think here's the thing. Technically speaking, within a US district, only the United States Attorney or an attorney specifically authorized by the AG under 28 USC 515 to bring charges (a "special attorney"), is authorized to indict. Assistant US Attorneys act in the name of the US Attorney. So if there is no validly serving/appointed US Attorney or special attorney, valid indictments may not be brought in that District. I think if you look at other indictments across the board, you'll see a signature block that is: ___________________________ United States Attorney for ____________ District by _________________________ Assistant United States Attorney If the US Attorney doesn't sign his or her self. So, they're having the conundrum that dipshits worldwide have when they fuck up. Should they pretend Halligan is the validly appointed/serving US Attorney and fuck up other indictments, or does appointing someone else unfuck future indictments but undercut the notion that Halligan is validly serving.
×
×
  • Create New...