So, let's assume that reducing government employees and associated expenditure is a good thing.
What might make it a good thing? Reducing the cost of government? Reducing the ability of government to "interfere" with daily life?
Assuming either of those things is actually good, then we might expect a reduction in the deficit or lower taxes.
We may see the latter, but probably not further than the already irresponsible 2017 cut, which was mostly ineffectual for the little guy. Does anyone actually think we'll see a deficit reduction?
I suppose the level of government "interference" is impossible to assess, but I bet you will see a decline in the quality of government services that is more objective and more subjectively felt outside corporate boardrooms.
So, even if you think cutting government employees and expenditures is good in some abstract sense, I don't think we're actually going to see any of the follow-on effects that really test that proposition.
He's not transparent at all, that's a misuse of the term. What he does do, and what Biden failed to do, was bloviate excessively about his alleged accomplishments.