Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    42292
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. Sara Ellis enjoins ICE finding ICE agents not credible and Bovino specifically a liar. https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/chicago-immigration-gregory-bovino-preliminary-injunction-judge-sara-ellis/ Can't find the actual document.
  2. Mark Twain said it first, attributing it to Disraeli, apparently incorrectly.
  3. Make that motherfucker eat a pound of gefilte fish. On camera.
  4. So, RD, I gather that you are quite the language savant. Why French (assuming here you were taking courses in French at the time)? Is it more of a "key" to "Romance languages"? Love the armadillo character, too.
  5. Sky news saying this is like Fox saying this, or Newsmax. Normally not credible, pretty credible on this. Oh, damn, wrong about this. Thought it was Brit version of Sky AU, which it is/was, but has escaped the clutches of Murdoch and is now legit.
  6. Aka Peter Thiel's gay boot camp. This is a demo of how badly these tool bags really need Trump to win elections.
  7. Someone pointed out that Fox ran a bit about Christians in Nigeria being persecuted just hours before his Truth rant.
  8. I'd guess catastrophic failure in the compressor section that blew or sawed off the front of the engine.
  9. I might tend to call that more than a "piece of cowling." That seems to include a sizable chunk of the compressor intake.
  10. Her lawyer is Larry Klayman. Lol.
  11. Tooling generally is almost a black art. Sand casting is necromancy.
  12. I think he's referring to Texas elections and the local electorate pulled another stupid yesterday.
  13. Cunt.
  14. Pretty sure this is all about going full anti-semite and anti-brown and openly endorsing Nick Fuentes. Half or more of them want to really badly.
  15. That Kaffir sandwich is something else, eh bru?
  16. SG D. John Sauer? As far as I can tell, he's pretty much a dickhead advocate. Paul Clement is a prickly prick, but he's not a dickhead advocate.
  17. I wanted to write in one of our cats in 2016. Texas doesn't allow write ins though. At least not in presidential elections.
  18. Yes. One of the main problems with bail was that it had become cookie cutter. This offense = $x bail. Recent bail reform focused mostly on eliminating that and forcing an actual analysis of defendant risk and commensurate bail. It does kind of default to "personal recognizance." Most of the controversial bail decisions are probably a result of judicial atrophy. They don't know how or care to perform the danger/flight risk analysis and set commensurate bail. So bail reform is kind of at fault in the "but/for" sense, but doesn't require low/no bail when the defendant is a risk.
  19. I'm super skeptical of reading tea leaves based on oral argument. But the fact that the justices would say "major question" or "non-delegation" in public and in connection with an anti-Trump appeal gives me some hope.
  20. Ah fuck it. It'll be like going to a foreign country. For real.
  21. Almost complete thread jack, what the hell is going on with that locomotive and the flat overhanging roof at the rear?
  22. Well, I do think Cheney was less cynically self-interested than Trump and many/most of his cronies. That his policies empowered and enriched him and those of his "class" was a nice side-effect of policies he thought best for the country. Which is subtly, or not so much, different from Trump's "what's good for me must be good for everyone else, but mostly it's good for me."
  23. So, this may not be the exact place for it, but I continue to be fascinated by "strong executive" political theories. I don't endorse them, particularly as currently implemented, but have to admit that they make some sense in a realpolitik sort of way. As noted in the piece above, Clinton and Obama were beneficiaries of and not exactly opposed to the strong executive theories advanced and implemented by predecessor administrations and people like Cheney. This partly or maybe largely in response to a gridlocked and ineffective Congress. But let's examine some things that make a strong executive sort of make sense, or, in the same breath, why Congress has become useless. Proliferation of agencies (Congress lacks the expertise and agility to address many situations and policies, so they delegate to agencies) Agencies are inherently a) undemocratic and b) easily captured by moneyed interests (point a) may actually be necessary) Do the agencies have to be executive controlled? Money in politics means Congress critters are less responsive to their constituents, to the people Related to or subsumed by the above, Congress critters are obsessed with reelection to the exclusion of doing congressional business The two-party and primary system force Congress critters to adhere often to "national" rather than local priorities, at least for election and fundraising purposes Writing these down, I start to think it is really nothing more than money in politics that has fucked everything up. No more, no less. Everything else is symptomatic. Blinding glimpse of the obvious, there.
×
×
  • Create New...