Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    36697
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. Not Americans, obvs. Commanis, marxis, and hommasekshuls and some of em are messkin.
  2. Are those really non-partisan? In the past, I have eschewed voting straight ticket because there have always been candidates in "less-partisan" races, usually judges, from both parties that were the most qualified/competent. But now, fuck all that. Anyone who would put an R by their name is unworthy of my vote. Straight ticket/punish Republicans for the foreseeable future.
  3. Well except for transgender folks. Who are apparently extremely important to his voters, despite constituting less than 2% of the population. And people who are that interested in a tiny fraction of the American people are also acutely interested in the dick size of long-dead golfers. It really makes perfect sense when you think about it.
  4. So, this was an ABC Movie of the Week in 1970. That would have made me four when it first showed. I don't think I was that young when I saw it, but I did see it with a teenaged babysitter from down the street and it scared the crap out of me. Lady above inherits a farm with a history of, and ongoing witchcraft. In one scene in particular, she "hallucinates" having a barn door placed on her and Puritan types stacking rocks on it. I mean, it was the ABC Movie of the Week, it's not like the babysitter was out renting inappropriate shit.
  5. Perhaps it's a sort of reaction to those who want to improve the state of things here and therefore "hate America."
  6. I mean, I don't vote for candidates that talk about other mens dicks in public in what is supposed to be a campaign rally. Among all the other crazy ass shit he talks. Don't need msnbc to figure that one out.
  7. Don't watch it bro. I don't watch, in particular, or read any single media source. I can read and watch videos and figure things out for myself. Shit, I haven't seen a Trump or Cruz campaign ad that isn't about transgendered people. That tells me all I need to know.
  8. I believe masochistic is the word you fellas are looking for here. Making someone else watch the game would be sadistic.
  9. Yes, yes I hate Trump. Because he is, in fact, un- or undereducated and a stupid, senile, narcissistic megalomaniac whose policies are bullshit, dogshit, or just plain evil or all three. And, I will vote for a woman with two degrees who passed the California bar exam over him every day and twice on Tuesday.
  10. Dallas. But yeah. Voted at Hamilton Park UMC, so a bit of extra flava from the nice aunties and grandmamas.
  11. Is this some kind of fact-check? My point was that LEA and the FBI might be motivated to underreport crime, so their stats might be juked low, ala Comstat. But I very seriously doubt that motivation or the results vary by politics. There is almost never an advantage for law enforcement to start overreporting crime. Therefore, while FBI stats may be on the low end, they are uniformly so, year-to-year and indicate that crime is, in fact, low currently.
  12. To what do you refer?
  13. This post in and of itself is so ridiculous as to be disqualifying. It's so completely Tracy Flick (fuck, not really, Tracy Flick wasn't that stupid). It's right up there with "there wasn't supposed to be fact-checking."
  14. I very seriously doubt CBS was intentionally trying to make Harris look better. The only difference between the two answers was length and clarity. And, I think this is pretty SOP. Still, doing such a thing in today's environment is risky. It's ironic, as always, that Trump would object, given his own complete word-tableside-Caesar-salads and the editing Fox and others routinely do to make him look better, e.g. the Town Hall.
  15. I think I might add that some or a lot of Dem policies really are just band-aids for the economy/middle class. And maybe they look like handouts, but I think more than handouts, they just feel like stopgaps, even to people who don't understand what is the problem. To really work for the middle class, Dem programs would need to be more structural, things like Wyden-Bennett and Liz Warren's proposals. Because it was structural things like repealing Glass-Steagall that got us here.
  16. What no one tells you is that hundreds of thousands of migrants were also released into the US under Trump.
  17. Well, then a huge fraud. Did I miss something that explained who he is?
  18. And is a fucking dumbass. I hope none of your friends and family use him for anything.
  19. Well, you're apparently a pretty young fella. Murdoch has owned DJI and WSJ since 2007, which is relatively recently in the long history of WSJ. By newsroom I assume Woodcock meant people like John Carreyrou, who exposed Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes; and were key in exposing Agnew, the Barbarians at the Gate saga (RJR Nabisco), Ivan Boesky, and Enron, among others. WSJ writers also exposed the Stormy Daniels payment. They've always been sort of Chamber of Commerce conservative, but have drifted into MAGA territory since the Murdoch takeover, but mostly in the opinion/editorial arena. Of course that arena and hard news are blurry these days.
  20. Was mentioned somewhere else but these propositions are the "Heros" act or some shit. Forces the city to hire more cops than they can run through the academy and, probably more importantly, train on the job. Possibly more importantly, waives city sovereign immunity. Yes, "we" generally don't like immunity when it favors cops or Trump, but you don't want to see what it's like when there's no restraint on the city being sued, and allowing claimaints to recover costs and attorneys fees. But, hell, don't take my word for it, do your own research. https://www.fox4news.com/news/election-2024-dallas-hero-amendments
  21. That commercial is sad as hell. Old guy seems pretty lucid but I think has been taken advantage of.
×
×
  • Create New...