Everything posted by TwiceHorn
-
Arch Manning: Scores every way possible
I think the WR, too. RB still suffers at the hands of the OL.
-
This is who Steve Sarkisian is.
My sense of it as well. Need to shore up the OL. WR and RB dysfunction I think mostly a product of OL. But we could stand a bigger RB with Baxter seeming to flop. Maybe a WR. Probably a TE. Time in program plus youngsters might take care of that. Sarkco just needs to have an "opposite day" this off-season. Whatever he did in Spring 2025, do the opposite thing.
- ATTN: SHEEPFUCKERS (Week 15 2025)
-
Best cast in any film all-time
Michael Clayton. Not the longest list of stars, or the biggest stars, but a very well-thought-out application of their talents. And none of them really typecast.
-
This is who Steve Sarkisian is.
Real talk on the contract. It would seem really incumbent on the University/System to have some sort of clause that permits termination on resumption of substance abuse or something similar. If for no other reason than to waive ADA application/accommodations, if that can be waived. Although kind of embarrassing for both sides, a person actually in recovery would understand and welcome it.
-
Trump’s America
La elección fue robbada. ROBBADA! Gracias por su atención en este asunto.
-
This is who Steve Sarkisian is.
I think it's relatively simple. Sark's had a lot of success here, and with the high-ranked classes, two CFP appearances/final four, Arch in the wings, an able assist from some less than ideal coaches, and maybe some personal distraction, Sark thought he had it knocked. The machine was rolling. Obviously, he did not. And I think he was every bit as shocked as all of us who swallowed all the 995 bs. That says something not great about Sark, I guess, a bit of arrogance, some inexperience playing and winning at the highest levels in the current environment, etc. It's really all in how he recovers from this.
-
Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
It probably literally fit either definition, maybe not crown of helmet. The rules are intended to objectively define an element of intent to make "forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball." But intent doesn't strictly come into it. Still, I think some sort of discretion should exist to rule that the hit didn't exhibit that type of forcible contact and thus did not constitute targeting.
-
Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet. The crown of the helmet is the top segment of the helmet; namely, the circular area defined by a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I) Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI) Note 1: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to: • Launch. A player leaving their feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area. • A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground. • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area. • Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to: • A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass. This includes an offensive player in a passing posture with focus downfield. • A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. • A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return. • A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not ha
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
-
James Comey is my Homie
It's pretty formalistic. But, hey, it's law, and criminal law at that. The evidence really seems to be that they voted true on two of the three counts. The two that are the subject of the current indictment. But they never saw or actually voted on the two-count indictment, which was the one returned to the court to commence the case. I'd really like to see more of the vindictive prosecution evidence come to light before anything gets dismissed.
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
-
James Comey is my Homie
I know, there's a question there. I've seen it discussed a few times, I don't think it's clear.
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC