Everything posted by TwiceHorn
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
- Texas vs. Arkansas - 2:30pm on ABC
-
2025 Week 13: Arkansas @ Texas.
https://thetvapp.link/cfb/arkansas-razorbacks-texas-longhorns/30655886856
-
Dallas Cowboys 2025 season thread: 8-9 and divine. The world according to Jerry
It's been a minute, but I don't think the White House was open the day/night before games. They were degenerates, but they performed, and for the most part avoided Bobby Layne pre and mid game antics, I think.
-
The Trump Economy
Anyone who's spent much time around hourly workers knows they'll do whatever to increase the size of their paycheck. Diddle withholding, skip insurance, skip 401k. And that probably extends into some salaried workers at the lower end as well.
-
RFK Jr. off the chain and off his rocker
Maybe Dwight wants to fuck her.
-
Candace Owens has balls. Sorry I meant Brigitte Macron has balls.
I can't let it go oh oh.
-
This is who Steve Sarkisian is.
Fun thing about the SECrant thread. They're less credulous of the rumors and basically laughing at us for a) indulging all the rumors and b) wanting to shitcan a coach that took us to the Final Four the last two years. Think about that for a minute. SECrant.
-
Candace Owens has balls. Sorry I meant Brigitte Macron has balls.
They're going to appeal and string this out. It's gonna cost Candy baby a shitload.
-
The Supremes
Also, taking it out of the rubric of legal analysis, and putting it purely in terms of politics or even political philosophy, SCOTUS in its shadow docket decisions is valuing the "rights" or power of the executive/government over the rights of the people. Specifically the executive. The legalistic excuse is that stays (or unstaying in some cases) are only temporary, pending a full decision on the merits. But, again in the real world, these stays last months or years before a more permanent solution is reached by a full decision on the merits. And it may well be that they ultimately rule against the executive/government, but the harm is mostly done by then. Which tells you that their harm analyses are wrong, ab initio.