Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    36636
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. She's an even bigger loser than Trump though. Not even these fucktards can convince themselves that she's successful somehow.
  2. You fucking sawed-off, stumpdick, okie twat plumber with latent syphilis, the federal government doesn't have any standards of ir-regularties. Wayne. You cunt.
  3. https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/31/politics/ralph-northam-third-trimester-abortion/index.html
  4. Gonna put this here instead of the other threads, but dammit, I miss YGIFS.
  5. Well, I think Clark has some extra appeal in that she is a white girl and ostensibly heterosexual. They like that she's putting it on all those nasty brown lesbos.
  6. Dallas/DFW also has a pretty "vibrant" Mormon community, which I think both attracts and guides them there.
  7. And I think a lot of the less-looney Trumpers have become either PNG or are quietly distancing themselves from the loser.
  8. Yep, that's an all-timer. I didn't have the plastic figures that the ringmeat kid did, but a lot of my friends did. That could have been me.
  9. Whether Biden's policy is wise, particularly keeping Trump's, which were broader-based (as opposed to targeted to certain things like EVs), is another question altogether. Also, I have seen some scholarly things that indicate the main effect of tariffs is not to even the trade balance overall, but to shift it to other foreign low-cost providers, like Vietnam, etc.
  10. https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/09/10/us-protectionism-biden-trump-tarrifs-harris-china/ Biden even increased them on certain goods. The idea seems to be to reduce dependence on Chinese imports. Even if it hurts us. Whatever you think of tariffs, Trump clearly does not understand them and attempting to finance programs using tariffs is pure idiocy.
  11. Well, further, it depends on the cause of action. What you most commonly see in federal courts is a "1983 violation," which is a violation of civil/constitutional rights. If a state permits it, state law torts can be alleged in addition and might have a different flavor of qualified immunity than what the constitutional torts under 1983 permit. Texas' version of official immunity for state torts is basically 100% immunity, it's not even qualified. Colorado apparently is waiving immunity for state torts, but has a damage cap. So that's why you pretty much only see 1983 claims in Texas.
  12. He doesn't even have to pack his asscrack with crunchy Jif.
  13. Well, here's some enshittening. Patently-o, the oldest and probably best patent law blog, is going to a monthly membership model starting today. Twenty years free. https://patentlyo.com/plans/join-2024 Not sure I blame him, but still.
  14. Dallas kid, probably kinda fratty. Also being TAPPS or whatever, figured he might be big fish in small pond rather than converse.
  15. Well, since the Supreme Court mostly took the student out of student-athlete, I guess who gives a fuck anymore. I used to consider it part of a university's obligation to its players to get them degreed. But that holds less water today.
  16. Now, a musical interlude.
  17. One place that NDAs rarely hold up, and many or most have a clause exempting disclosure to, is when law-enforcement comes a-knockin, even civil subpoenas tend to be an out on NDAs.
  18. Could have been an illusion created by second-teamers and lack of urgency, but it looked to me like Warren grew up a bit yesterday. He may prove to be a serviceable QB before it's all said and done.
×
×
  • Create New...