Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    42315
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. Name rung a bell, but couldn't remember when he played. Because he didn't much. Class of 99, Parade All American. Transferred to Blinn, signed again. Started like seven games. An all-time bust. Alfio Randall-Veasey at the time. He might still know what he's talking about though.
  2. Close. A trademark becomes abandoned, by statute, after three years of non-use. So, for a lot of schools, there are a number of abandoned throwback logos and such that they can't/don't claim a trademark in and therefore can't/don't license. So a "throwback" seller may be able to get away without paying royalties or having a license for a while anyway. UT is pretty savvy and ruthless and made little efforts here and there to make sure even ancient, largely unused logos and marks did not go abandoned. So any attempt by a seller to go royalty free on an old logo would be met with a cease and desist from Pirkey Barber and be forced to sign up with CLC/Learfield, whoever they are now.
  3. No whiskey. No hash browns.
  4. I consider that a different issue altogether.
  5. With or without pressure. Pressure turned Ewers into a basket case most of the time. Arch just is a basket case, the pressure doesn't make it any worse. He actually stood and delivered a couple of times today.
  6. With the exception of not getting the ball out, Arch handles pressure better than Ewers. No happy feet, few ill-advised throws, no stepping into sacks. He's kind of a shitty defense reader and passer with or without pressure.
  7. Well, until this season, most of the bitching about Sark has been akin to complaining about not being hanged with a new rope. Now, he's actually got some tangible adversity to face down. Let's see how he responds.
  8. This OL has never been good. There have been times that Arch wasn't pressured much, but they've never blocked a decent running game. Who the fuck knows what might have come to pass if we could generate a running game. And that's mostly on the OL.
  9. I disagree that he self-sacks like Ewers. He handles pressure much better. But he's still slow as fuck getting the ball out, and that might lead to sacks.
  10. So, whether Arch advances to serviceable or average, or even above average, do we really want him here next year as QB1?
  11. No one here fucking argues that. Better regulated capitalism is not socialism or communism.
  12. Yeah OL play took a significant step up when he got here, but never much further, despite the alleged talent. And this big a dropoff is inexcusable.
  13. Thought about adding that, yes.
  14. That might actually be the best thing.
  15. Arch is definitely growing up, but this OL is going to be a problem the rest of the season. They fucking suck.
  16. Given the pressure he's been under, he's been pretty decent. Would be nice if he could get it out a little quicker sometimes. But that also requires an open WR.
  17. Absolutely. Our talent is always overrated.
  18. That was actually pretty nice.
  19. Human centipede. 22-man human centipede.
  20. Our "talent" is about half bullshit anyway. It's all based on the same assholes that told us Arch was all-world.
  21. Geezus fucking criminy.
  22. There really isn't such thing as a quick hitter with Arch.
  23. Total Buttfucking. This is as bad OL play as we've ever had and we've had some shitty OL. Flood needs to be fired ASAP.
×
×
  • Create New...