Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    37638
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. Your google fu sucks. https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/29/politics/trump-cnn-big-lie-defamation-lawsuit/index.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/09/business/media/trump-new-york-times-lawsuit-dismissed.html https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/federal-judge-sanctions-trump-lawyer-nearly-1-million-rcna66652 (not really anything, but defamation comes as close to a cause of action that might have been pled) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/03/donald-trump-lawsuit-new-york-times-mary-trump (not really defamation, but close) https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/washington-post-beats-trump-media-merger-defamation-suit-for-now https://reason.com/2023/02/06/a-federal-judge-has-dismissed-the-trump-campaigns-defamation-lawsuit-against-the-washington-post/ https://www.wpr.org/media/trump-campaign-lawsuit-against-northwoods-tv-station-dismissed https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2020cv00626/215841/25/
  2. I've got more guns than you and I virtually guarantee I'm a better shot.
  3. It's still there. Not in Lakewood anymore?
  4. https://dallashero.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Dallas-Petition-Police-Objectives-FINAL_removed.pdf I overstated, but it's in the first section. If at any time the total actual, accruing or estimated annual revenue of the City exceeds the total actual annual revenue of the prior fiscal year, the City Council shall appropriate no less than 50% of such excess amount, in compliance with Section 1 of Chapter XI of this Charter, to fund the Dallas Police and Fire Pension System – Combined Plan, in the amount directed by the State Pension Review Board and/or the City Council, whichever is higher. Any monies remaining shall be appropriated to the Public Safety Objectives described below in Section B.
  5. Burger House is unique, if not great.
  6. Trump has sued MSM a dozen times since his election and lost every time. Under the same rules applied to Fox.
  7. They reported what people said. Take it up with the people who said it. And, complained quietly about not having access to Biden.
  8. I love how all of a sudden thinking Harris would win was gaslighting. No one knew shit about fuck.
  9. Yeah I didn't mean to insinuate that Trump is not with P2025. But P2025 is too ideological and insufficiently personal for Trump. His idiocy and fragility may exceed his useful idiocy for the P2025 types.
  10. This kind of belies the notion that the P2025 people are ready to hit the ground running.
  11. I mean, that's not the only evidence that Cuban is just another shitty oligarch. There's plenty of past evidence of that. He has seemed to mellow some over the years.
  12. I heard, I think on NPR, a history of CNN. In the early days of cable, Turner had his stations that made their money off sports broadcasting and syndicated content, ie re-runs and old movies. So, kind of lowest-common-denominator entertainment. The FCC notified Ted that to retain its broadcasting license, it would have to provide news content, pursuant to the Fairness Doctrine (which required not only fairness in content, but required news content). Ted hated this and created CNN specifically to be infotainment, presumably to sell more ads.
  13. Yeah, it's kind of like "motive, means, and opportunity." It's not something that's an element of the crime, precisely (you do have to prove that the defendant caused death), but it's something you may need to convince a jury that the murder actually happened. What lawdogs call the burden of persuasion more than the burden of proof.
  14. You know what makes vote counting faster? Dominion machines and similar.
  15. Then USSR called and called dibs.
  16. In general, he's a pretty bright dude and insightful. But also probably pretty naive.
  17. And no one disagreed with you. You have become a beating.
  18. Yes, come into CR with a reasoned opinion and not something semi- or non-factually based, you get a dialog. No one does that.
  19. Here's the thing that makes this scary. The above is evidence that Trump has bad impulses. During his first administration, he had people that weren't unflinchingly loyal and curbed many of his worse impulses. Those guardrails are not going to be present or as present this time around. The DOJ, for example, will be full of Jeffery Clarks and guys like Richard Donoghue that kept things semi-sane are not going to be around. There won't be any or many Greg Jacobs fending off lunatics like Eastman. He also won't be running for re-election, either by term limits or something nefarious that makes him president-for-life, so he will be unaffected by popular sentiment. On the other hand, he's such a titty-baby for publicity and "ratings," that may operate as something of a curb on him.
  20. May be right there, except it was established that he's not Chrispy. Someone else copped to that.
  21. Well that much is apparent, I just want to know his name.
  22. Well, targeted tariffs for goods like EVs that Chinese are producing at a loss, subsidized by the government, keeps those from being an attractive option. If he implements tariffs on ALL goods from China, that's going to raise price on a lot of staple goods, like half of everything at Walmart or more. If people are grousing about the price of eggs and gas, they ain't seen nothin yet.
  23. I wouldn't want his nasty ass fumes on my food. I'd grab a can of kerosene.
  24. Who is that smug cocksucker?
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...