Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    37432
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. No. One of the things he's doing is setting up a constitutional challenge to the Impoundment Control Act, which limits the ability of POTUS to impound or restrict use of funds authorized by Congress. This administration is going to spend an unprecedented amount of time in court.
  2. He was super jacked up on being a fucking Nazi and showed his true colors, Don't defend Elmo, the guy is a complete asshole. He's an oligarch that is acting 100% out of self-interest, that is, preserving and increasing his wealth. Being a Trump cultist is a helluva thing.
  3. That's a problem for both of them and the other similar platforms. Nonetheless, one has a lot more bullshit on it than the other. I agree that people should check sources.
  4. Also. Trump has little or nothing to do with this, nor does the government. It was commenced during the Biden administration. These are just people gobbling his crank.
  5. Funny, Russ, two of the three don't even apply to working-age people. Dildo.
  6. Render unto Caesar, indeed. Christ on a crutch.
  7. Not legally they don't. Maybe as a practical matter if there is a small estate.
  8. Perhaps, you troglodyte, the prayer on National Prayer Day was intended to address those who worship God, but not Christ, as well as followers of Christ. There are a few of those, yknow. And, regarding the bold, Jesus was kind of the ultimate social activist.
  9. An old buddy of mine does or did patent contingency work for a while. He mentioned getting a check for $1M one time. Not to the firm, to him personally.
  10. It's actually something of a testament to the level of freedom we have achieved when the figurative polka aficionados are clashing with the figurative late-night silence aficionados in the highest tribunes of the land.
  11. Ironically, a bunch of Christofascist, mostly Catholic, assholes has co-opted the term "common good" for a scheme that achieves just that -- provided you think common good is defined by a bunch of Christofascist assholes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_good_constitutionalism I'm sure you're quite aware of this, but posted for those who aren't. IconoMacklemore is a cheerleader for this.
  12. Well, to a certain extent I agree with you. But, you have to acknowledge that Jenner is trans, among other things. Just because she's a piece of shit doesn't mean you can show disrespect to her transness, without showing disrespect to all trans. I detest Candace Owen, but I'm not about to start calling her a hard r for that very reason. I was not aware that the deadname was such a mortal thing, although it makes sense with slight reflection. So I could have made that mistake. I rely on troph and safe sex to keep me on the straight and narrow on such matters, and my group of gay friends..
  13. That Texas Law Help has consistently pretty good information, I think. It seems to be put up by an actual indigent representation 501c3 and seems to be reliable. I notice that the SEA page has links to local practices on SEAs, and Dallas' is pretty comprehensive, even if Dallas isn't the location in question. There's even a chart of intestate succession that might have been handy during the bar exam.
  14. Yeah it could. Not sure it's necessary, though. I think that helps with property titles, like cars and real estate and even accounts when there's no survivorship, or POD, or tenants in common. But, slorch should talk to a lawdog. This isn't my area, but I have been administrator of both my parents estates and am an educated observer. https://texaslawhelp.org/article/small-estate-affidavits That might be just the ticket.
  15. As set forth above, I tend to agree with your position on Ulbricht, at least in the abstract (not knowing super-specific facts). And, if he did order hits, why wasn't he charged with it? I'm not down for life sentences for drug dealers, as a general proposition, or money launderers either. I think a commutation of the rest of his sentence would be more appropriate than a pardon. What's in this for Trump anyway? Jr. like to buy his shit off the internet?
  16. Yes, please. Special Counsel or Special Prosecutors are not special because they have any special powers, really. They are appointed when there is a conflict of interest between the "line" Department of Justice and the defendant or target of the investigation, usually also part of the Executive, or the interests of the Attorney General, or a Deputy, or the President, for example. People have this persistent idea that Special Counsel are some kind of "Uber prosecutor" appointed when we're super srs about some crime. That's not it at all. They are special in the sense that they usually have just one job, as opposed to the many things pulling on US Attorneys, and their "jurisdiction" is not somewhat geographically limited in the same way as US Attorneys. And they tend to be very good prosecutors. But other than that, they're not so special. Garland did not appoint Smith because he finally got serious about Trump, it was because Trump declared his candidacy against the sitting President, nominal head of DOJ, making the conflict of interest more real and less theoretical.
  17. What a crock of shit. When did you become such a conspiracy nut?
  18. I think his sentence is overlong. I would favor a commutation of all but maybe 10-15 years.
  19. Also, regarding Woodrow Wilson and Eugene Debs. Many prosecutions have some political elements to them, sure. No argument there. And the Alien and Sedition Acts have a sorry history of attempting to criminalize dissident, but not criminal speech. The Debs prosecution was a pretty shameful episode in our history, both for the law applied and the way the prosecution was conducted, although Debs was his own worst enemy there. And we already knew Wilson was a piece of shit. Also Debs ran for President from prison. Obviously, he was not elected, but a precedent for Trump. His sentence was commuted by Harding, which I find highly appropriate.
  20. The way I see it, when the government criminally prosecutes someone, it is absolutely the most acute pitting of the government against the individual, and the power imbalance is enormous. I think that's the way it should be seen and why we have a presumption of innocence and various other procedural safeguards available (at least to those with the savvy, lawyers, and finances to assert them). When an incoming administration has sworn to prosecute people ahead of any criminal investigation and without serious regard to their actual guilt, but because of their political opposition, or even more petty reasons (making Trump look bad), I can't really argue with a pardon to preempt that. Among Biden's pardons, Hunter's is certainly worse, as he was investigated, tried, and found guilty. When the facts are as bad as they were against Hunter, the notion of a prosecution being "political" kind of loses any significance. The same is also true of Trump's criminal charges. I am a big fan of pardons, more specifically commutations of sentences. The justice machine reaches some really draconian results in too many cases. But, that has little bearing on this.
  21. But the adults are back in office.
  22. Fucking adults. Gulf of America. Again, OP. FUCK YOUR OWN FACE. EABOD AND DIAF.
×
×
  • Create New...