![](https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/uploads/set_resources_29/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Paul Wesley
Certifiably Surly-
Posts
1984 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Everything posted by Paul Wesley
-
Pretty sure SEC wanted to keep a numerical balance while simultaneously adding the Texas footprint with the addition of A&M, and it made geographic sense. Their league expanded to the west. Mizzou was in the right place at the right time (their football team was in a good place at the time as well). I don't know if they'd have been admitted without an Aggie program eager to get out from under the shadow of UT.
-
Exactly what Skipper said. The smaller schools in the Big 12 have focused 100% of their anger on the last two locomotives to give up on pulling the fucking train, and not the numerous other schools (the three you mentioned plus Mizzou) who ACTED ENTIRELY IN THEIR OWN BEST INTEREST AND SPLIT A LONG TIME AGO. I have never held any personal ill will toward Oklahoma State, Tech, or Iowa State, but the more I have to listen to hysterical and irrational bullshit about mean ol' greedy Texas, the less I fucking care about the fate of their athletic programs.
-
Not much of a baseball mind, but it seems to me like you'd send they guy who just struck out the side back out there.
-
I think Sammy Hagar had a similar quote about being at a sound check and Eddie wasn't around, so he plugged into Eddie's rig... and sounded like Sammy. But yeah, we don't think about "tone" as much with bass players, but I'm sure the sound is just as much in the hands as the rig.
-
I'm sipping coffee and scrolling this thread, with ESPN on in the background. ESPN just did a segment with Finebaum (I know, I know) and Dinich, and they nodded their heads in agreement as the host said, "We may remember this as the biggest day in the history of college football," and went on to say how OU and Texas joining the SEC was going to cause massive and permanent realignments. I think there was a chyron that made the same statement. I mean... try to reconcile that actual, real-time national ESPN reaction to Liucci's contemporaneous claim that Aggie going to the SEC "elicited the same coverage." No, it fucking didn't. He's just hilariously and objectively wrong to claim that Aggie got the same coverage.
-
This cannot be quoted enough. Aggies were coming off multiple NCAA sanctions and were known to be major offenders. FOUR DAYS after their most recent sanctions had been announced, they FedExed cash (obvious hush money) to a disgruntled former running back, who took it to the Dallas Morning News to open it. The return address was from the Aggie coaching staff, for fuck's sake. I mean, it's no different than Clements' "we had a payroll" shit at SMU. They were going to keep right on cheating as long as the program existed (which they obviously did).
-
I would like to keep Texas Tech game on the schedule
Paul Wesley replied to The Earl of Texas's topic in Football
Haha. I was actually going to reference Maryland and BYU. We played Arkansas for purely nostalgic reasons (?2003), and they came in here and whipped our ass. I’m certainly not advocating for Incarnate Word or Chattanooga State, but our SOS in this theoretical new SEC won’t need any marginal lifts by going back to the altar to flirt with a jilted Stillwater, Ames, or Manhattan (as opposed to playing regional teams like Tulane, Rice, or *maybe* SMU). -
That guy is an idiot. UH and SMU at numbers one and two? So the Big 12 should try to *exactly* replicate a financially non-viable SWC (which we already started by adding TCU)? I just wrote a long post about this on the "What killed the SWC" thread, then clicked around to see this tweet. Ugh.
-
I would like to keep Texas Tech game on the schedule
Paul Wesley replied to The Earl of Texas's topic in Football
With regard to OOC scheduling, I seem to recall a poster (?Scipio) who once accurately advocated for either (A) you play home-and-home with a blue blood like USC, Michigan, Ohio State, Notre Dame. ***or** (B) you play a patsy -- maybe in a 2-for-1 series -- with a. regional team like Rice or Tulane, so that your team gets a few wins and your alums get some home games (or de facto home games), and the players get to play in front of their families at Rice stadium or wherever. But as I recall, and I think this was the phrase used, "Don't mess with Mr In-between." i.e. don't travel far away to play mid-level teams who aren't marquee opponents, yet they're still good enough to beat you. And though I like a lot of those fan bases (Oklahoma State, Iowa State), playing those teams 5 years from now really does nothing to sell your program to recruits ("Hey, Johnny Five Star! If you come here, you'll get to be on TV when we go to AMES/STILLWATER/ETC!!!!!!"). And those schools might have a proven head coach (Patterson, Gundy), who will fucking hang an out-of-conference "L" on you in a night-time, biggest-home-game-of-their-year upset. Outside of nostalgia, there would be very little upside to playing almost all the teams in your poll. -
Yeah, the original Big 12 was a good league, with a high % of teams that could carry their own weight. Nebraska was one of the best two or three teams in football at the time, Colorado was not too far removed from their own national championship. Missouri had a well-run basketball program, etc. The Aggies still had a good football team (undoubtedly benefitting from the previous 15 years of cash-filled FedEx envelopes under Sherill and Slocum). The modern Big 12 is pretty meh. We really started turning back into the SWC, which a lot of people (including me) warned when we added TCU -- it did nothing to expand the footprint... it just added more boxcars to the conference train being pulled by fewer and fewer locomotives (Texas and OU). Maybe.... ***maybe*** the Big 12 could have survived the defections if were able to expand the footprint... maybe adding BYU and Utah in the west, Cincinnati and Louisville in the midwest, etc. I type that with the full realization that those would still be enormous downgrades from Nebraska, Colorado, Missouri, etc.... I'm just saying, it *might* have kept the league viable. Anyway, it looks like the final chapter of the Big 12 is getting written, and the reasons for its demise are very similar to those of the SWC.
-
I've seen that too. It's silly. Lots of good answers on this thread already. I think we were just starting to see TV money start to wag the dog (dictate everything that happens in college football). And Texas was stuck in a tiny little 1-state footprint with a lot of schools that commanded zero television sets. It became an undeniable factor in watching Texas high school talent leave the state. It didn't help that, at the time (mid- and late-80's) we were not only competing with bigger, better network deals, we were also competing with some of the most flagrant cheaters in the history of college sports (Switzer's Sooners, Sherill and Slocum's aggies, the fucking governor's SMU Mustangs). If you were to make a list of the top 100 things that killed the SWC, "Texas" wouldn't be on it. edit: stuck in a 2-state conference until Arkansas bailed... then a 1-state conference with no hope of generating TV money like the Big 10, SEC, and PAC10.
-
I'm sure this has been covered in this thread... but the aggies just cannot fucking decide if the LHN is a death-star-level advantage for UT that gives us an unfair monetary and recruiting edge (they consistently named the LHN as a primary reason for leaving the Big 12), or if the LHN is a national embarrassment, a financial disaster, and a punchline within the world of sports media ("dumpster fire" in that thread title).
-
Exactly. So Tech is going to do what's best for Tech. Crazy concept.
-
Agreed Every school does what's best for themselves.... Arkansas, Colorado, Nebraska, Aggies, Missouri, Notre Dame, TCU, West Virginia, etc.... they left/joined/stayed in various leagues over the last 30 years -- basically they were all self-interested. Except when Texas even hints that when this TV deal is done in five years, then we might be acting in our own best interest, and then suddenly there's this deafening chorus about how we're bullies, or impossible to live with, or how totally unfair we are. It's silly.
-
A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]
Paul Wesley replied to Francisco 2.0's topic in Cloak Room
Yeah, I've been clueless and wrong so many times in the last 5 years in my understanding about who we are as a nation. I didn't think evangelical christians would lustily endorse a man who is so obviously and profoundly immoral, and vote for him even after hearing him brag about sexual assault. I didn't think they'd take his side during the election when he repeatedly insulted the parents of an American soldier who died for this country. I didn't think we'd have an American president publicly kneeling before Putin while dismissing our allies. I didn't think an American president would find it impossible to denounce David Duke (pretending not to know who he was after speaking about him in numerous interviews) or be so visibly angry when forced to denounce the Nazi who killed someone in Charlottesville ("Both sides!"). I didn't think those same American white people would take the side of the pro-authoritarian mob who broke into the Capitol instead of supporting the officers who they killed or the democracy they wanted to overthrow. But it turns out that your pro-Trump consultant understood America much better than you or me. I'm still kind of in shock, to be honest. -
100% this.
-
I know exactly what you quoted, and that argument about the superiority of "natural immunity" -- which the anti-vaxxers love, and which you are parroting here -- is totally wrong. That's MY point. Above that, you claimed that the "medical community" was "starting to come around" that multiple doses of vaccine were wasteful and unnecessary, which is also wrong.
-
You understand that none of this is an argument against vaccines, right? I mean, let's consider an outcome where the whole world gets vaccinated. There would likely be a handful of deaths from cavernous sinus thrombosis or DVT or anaphylaxis. Maybe. AND THEN ALMOST NO ONE ON THE PLANET DIES FROM COVID-19 (you know, in EXACTLY the same way that we don't die from polio and we don't die from smallpox). Furthermore, even if a vaccinated person passes the delta variant to another vaccinated person (which is unlikely), no one dies from that either. Contrast that to a world where no one gets vaccinated, and we continue to suffer socially and economically with years and years of masks and distancing and "hey, kids, don't go near Grandma!" Sporting events and religious ceremonies are life-threatening endeavors. Educating an entire generation is problematic to say the least. Healthcare workers leave the field in droves (which is already happening). And we'll have TENS OF MILLIONS OF MORE DEATHS. But hey, everyone, look at the bright side! THOSE OF US WHO SURVIVE OUR COVID INFECTIONS AND HAVE ANTIBODIES MIGHT BE LESS LIKELY TO GET THE DELTA VARIANT! AS IF THAT WOULD BE A MEANINGFUL FUCKING METRIC. And it also ignores the fact that in an unvaccinated world, there is going to be a lot more delta variant and every other variant bouncing around for generations to come. Your post is an excellent example of how anti-vaxxers will always find conspiracies, half-truths, and fallacious arguments, and they'll repeat all of them to anyone who will listen... despite overwhelming evidence that they're wrong. Apologies to the board for engaging the obvious troll, but there might be a few people out there on the fence of whether to take the vaccine, and I wouldn't want those people to mistake GRHorn's nonsense for a meaningful argument. Thank God we got smallpox off the table a few decades before the trolls got broadband. We'll never do anything like that again.
-
Yeah, I have a good friend who is a big sports fan... MLB, NFL, NHL... everything except for NBA basketball. He says the randomness and inconsistency of officiating ruins the game for him. This game would certainly bolster his argument. Oh... and he's from Milwaukee.
-
Booker jumping up looking for the call... I don't have the words.
-
Crowder is getting calls like he's Jordan. Three very iffy calls in the past few minutes, and he got them all.
-
Share Your Music (it probably sucks but that’s not why we do it)
Paul Wesley replied to NoRagrets's topic in Music
Ambitious and cool. Keep chopping. -
Share Your Music (it probably sucks but that’s not why we do it)
Paul Wesley replied to NoRagrets's topic in Music
nice job, ztejas.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!