Jump to content

Hagbard Celine

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    17792
  • Joined

Everything posted by Hagbard Celine

  1. old time hockey
  2. i am 100% pro-diversity and have gone out of my way in my life to support dei before it was a thing apologies troph if you're reading this - please take no offense i am repping stassney on this - every segment of the rebel alliance would be better off today if the left had taken a heteromale non-embrace campaign with max force projection in the swing states pink pony hair and the tq part of the acronym were weaponized as boat anchors around our necks and if we survive few reading this will live to see the restoration of the law and the values of the founders
  3. the canadian fans are going to obliterate any sense of decorum our anthem will be booed and whistled out of existence kevin mar has learned how to skate canada 3 us 0
  4. mitch is old news the only thing that matters now are statewide races and the us senate all the money and effort should go to the contestable statewide races and any us senate seat in play in every election there are 30-40 senate seats contested every 2 years in states where a us senate seat is up, every dime should go to that race in states where no senate seats are up, only spend to contest statewide races
  5. maga will agitate for their freedom
  6. want to make sure everyone actually watches the video not only does he slept himself on mitch, but he throws shade at kaitlin collins
  7. in the red dawn scenario, the cubans and nicaraguans are no match for armored teslas driven by 100000 oakley-wearing maga-bros with after-market unpinned semiautos
  8. the amount and quality of 'downloaded' data in my opinion is not worth the effort because you are still going to have to run a tbt real time for directions i'm a geographer - i want both the cell & the paper i don't use apple products so i don't know how their mapping engine works nor do i know how well gmaps runs on ios with gmaps you can build your itineraries before you leave home, with up to 10 "stops" per "route" which equates to 10 nodes per unique shareable link share the link by text with every other cell traveling in your party before you get on the plane in the morning every day load the links for the day's "routes" given your intended pace and desire for mission control (casual and low) you are highly unlikely to have more that 2 "routes" (links) per day, just string them together by making the "stop" 10 on the route 1 also be "starting point" ("stop 1") on route 2 why landranger? here's current "free" OS: here's gmaps, satview: the landrangers are more modern, cleaner version of this:
  9. to the question of where does the army stand, request to counselors present to lawsplain this statement from that article: "they're honorable officers and they are bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice not to obey unlawful orders"
  10. he can be stopped with guile and subterfuge targeting his creatures in congress with their greatest fear - loss of power why do we need congress any more? false-maga astroturfing is EASY the right has never built defenses against their own offensive weaponry because it has never been turned on them yo - spacelaserhoar - you should resign and PROVE your loyalty to dear leader by firing yourself - you are not needed any more - we don't need congress any more! 1000 maga mails and calls hitting her offices on the hill and back in norga will do the trick rinse repeat all maglets nationwide
  11. Trump’s fractious relationship with the NFL predates the anthem controversy. Long a frustrated wannabe team owner, he made a failed attempt to buy the Buffalo Bills in 2014 in what turned into a fierce rivalry with a bid spearheaded by Jon Bon Jovi. And as the owner of the New Jersey Generals, a team in the defunct United States Football League, he led an ill-fated anti-trust lawsuit against the NFL in 1986 with the aim of forcing a merger. But he was feted by fans on a visit to a Pittsburgh Steelers game last October, while in his previous term as president he named the co-owner of the New York Jets, Woody Johnson, as ambassador to the UK. The Republican wrote on Friday that it “WILL BE A GREAT GAME!!!” However, the state of relative calm between Trump and the NFL might be contingent on the musical entertainment and whether the Chiefs win their third successive title. The half-time show is not usually overtly political but this year it is headlined by the rapper Kendrick Lamar, whose 2015 track Alright was adopted by Black Lives Matter demonstrators. In 2017 he rapped: “Donald Trump is a chump”. Trump, meanwhile, hailed the Chiefs on social media after their AFC Championship Game victory over the Bills a fortnight ago: “Congratulations to the Kansas City Chiefs. What a GREAT Team, Coach, Quarterback, and virtually everything else, including those fantastic FANS, that voted for me (MAGA!) in record numbers.” He also praised the Bills. But there was no mention of the Eagles thrashing the Washington Commanders earlier in the day. Philadelphia won the Super Bowl in 2018. That year Trump scrapped their invitation to the White House - an honor habitually afforded to the victorious team - after it became clear that almost none of the players or staff were willing to attend as a result of his divisive conduct. Last year Trump depicted the heavily-Democratic city as a crime-ravaged dystopia. Another Philadelphia victory might re-ignite hostilities and explode what appears to be an uneasy truce – or else offer more evidence that the sporting climate has shifted from resistance to acceptance. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/feb/08/super-bowl-trump-end-racism-politics I have hated the eagles since vermeil, carmichael & jaws they are now my 2nd favorite team
  12. his statement about following court orders was a terrible mistake whether lying or not, he's given the left a pivot and the press a wedge "you said you follow court orders but you fired the guy who pointed out you are burning $500m in perishable food because you're not following a court order, which is it?" this is so easy and the dems are SSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO stupid running false-flag astroturfing on every pub rep office email and voicemail with this 1 message is soooo easy "i want my free food! - we're in charge now - why are we letting it rot? - give it to MAGA!"
  13. BREAKING 20 MINUTES AGO 21 min ago “I always abide by the courts,” Trump says after several policy priorities were halted From CNN's Donald Judd President Donald Trump said Tuesday he will “always abide by the courts,” after reporters asked if he’d follow a judge’s ruling if it blocked one of his administration’s policy priorities. “Well, I always abide by the courts, and then I’ll have to appeal it. But then what he’s done is he’s slowed down the momentum, and it gives crooked people more time to cover up the books,” Trump said. “So yeah, the answer is, I always abide by the courts, always abide by them, and we’ll appeal, but appeals take a long time.”
  14. BREAKING 20 MINUTES AGO 21 min ago “I always abide by the courts,” Trump says after several policy priorities were halted From CNN's Donald Judd President Donald Trump said Tuesday he will “always abide by the courts,” after reporters asked if he’d follow a judge’s ruling if it blocked one of his administration’s policy priorities. “Well, I always abide by the courts, and then I’ll have to appeal it. But then what he’s done is he’s slowed down the momentum, and it gives crooked people more time to cover up the books,” Trump said. “So yeah, the answer is, I always abide by the courts, always abide by them, and we’ll appeal, but appeals take a long time.”
  15. i looked at this last night i was told no maths - my understanding is 67 is the senate conviction requirement - no VP tiebreaks - & i'm factoring the 2 current indeps as blue current score: blue 47, red 53 in 26 (if we have elections) in play: 13 blue, 22 red we need 33 of 35 some will stand down, a couple will pass on, but here's the moonshot list it's never happened but oh what a glorious day it would be ORANGE SHITGIBBON: YOU'RE FIRED! VANCE: YOU'RE FIRED TOO! under the constitution, no appeal, instant removal from office, barred from ever holding office again i'm saying there's a chance Minnesota Tina Smith Democratic March 4, 1958 (age 66) Colorado John Hickenlooper Democratic February 7, 1952 (age 73) Delaware Chris Coons Democratic September 9, 1963 (age 61) Georgia Jon Ossoff Democratic February 16, 1987 (age 37) Illinois Dick Durbin Democratic November 21, 1944 (age 80) Massachusetts Ed Markey Democratic July 11, 1946 (age 78) Michigan Gary Peters Democratic December 1, 1958 (age 66) New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen Democratic January 28, 1947 (age 78) New Jersey Cory Booker Democratic April 27, 1969 (age 55) New Mexico Ben Ray Luján Democratic June 7, 1972 (age 52) Oregon Jeff Merkley Democratic October 24, 1956 (age 68) Rhode Island Jack Reed Democratic November 12, 1949 (age 75) Virginia Mark Warner Democratic December 15, 1954 (age 70) Alabama Tommy Tuberville Republican September 18, 1954 (age 70) Alaska Dan Sullivan Republican November 13, 1964 (age 60) Arkansas Tom Cotton Republican May 13, 1977 (age 47) Florida Ashley Moody Republican March 28, 1975 (age 49) Idaho Jim Risch Republican May 3, 1943 (age 81) Iowa Joni Ernst Republican July 1, 1970 (age 54) Kansas Roger Marshall Republican August 9, 1960 (age 64) Kentucky Mitch McConnell Republican February 20, 1942 (age 82) Louisiana Bill Cassidy Republican September 28, 1957 (age 67) Maine Susan Collins Republican December 7, 1952 (age 72) Mississippi Cindy Hyde-Smith Republican May 10, 1959 (age 65) Montana Steve Daines Republican August 20, 1962 (age 62) Nebraska Pete Ricketts Republican August 19, 1964 (age 60) North Carolina Thom Tillis Republican August 30, 1960 (age 64) Ohio Jon Husted Republican August 25, 1967 (age 57) Oklahoma Markwayne Mullin Republican July 26, 1977 (age 47) South Carolina Lindsey Graham Republican July 9, 1955 (age 69) South Dakota Mike Rounds Republican October 24, 1954 (age 70) Tennessee Bill Hagerty Republican August 14, 1959 (age 65) Texas John Cornyn Republican February 2, 1952 (age 73) West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito Republican November 26, 1953 (age 71) Wyoming Cynthia Lummis Republican September 10, 1954 (age 70)
  16. #teammarshallmadisonholla i hope you're goddamn right ray of hope: shitgibbon is bitching this afternoon about the courts slowing him down hitler didn't bitch - he went and got the rulings he wanted in the category of bitchassedness, loompa is creating an endless vortex of timesuck for himself in gaza unfortunately for the palestinians - bad for them - good for us - he has less time to fuck shit up over here
  17. the landing at lake pleasant https://www.facebook.com/BoneyardSafari/videos/and-touch-down-of-philippine-mars-c-flyk-at-lake-pleasant-az-philippinemars-mart/501922605900260/
  18. THEY BOLTED!!!!!! it's gone to az fucking weasels https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/c-flyk#391520de they turned off the ads-b over indio it either turned left and went to havasu, set down in the salton sea (doubtful), or made for the gila river we'll find out tomorrow
  19. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/he-gets-to-make-the-decisions-jim-jordan-argues-trump-can-ignore-judges/ar-AA1yHcld?apiversion=v2&noservercache=1&domshim=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1&batchservertelemetry=1&noservertelemetry=1 'He gets to make the decisions!' Jim Jordan argues Trump can ignore judges Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) argued on CNN Sunday that the Constitution gives President Trump the power to make the decisions he feels are best for the country, checks and balances from Congress and the courts be damned. Inside Politics host Manu Raju asked Jordan about a Reagan-appointed federal judge who argued "the president is going too far" on policy changes like rescinding birthright citizenship. "I'm talking about, there's a pattern where judges are saying they're going too far on these issues," Raju pressed after Jordan argued it was "just one judge" who blocked Trump's order to end birthright citizenship. "All I know is, again, Article Two, Section One, the very first sentence, 'The executive power shall be vested in a president,'" Jordan said, citing the Constitution. "I think it's important, 'a president of the United States of America,' not in bureaucrats, not in career people — in the president. The guy who put his name on the ballot." Jordan continued, "This is a fundamental difference we have with the left. The left thinks, 'Oh, it's the career experts who make the decisions.' That's not how our country works. It's the guy who puts his name on the ballot, gets elected by 'We the people.' He gets to make the decisions, or she gets to make the decisions. That's how — we don't want the Faucis of the world and all the people in the bureaucracy making the decisions. We want the guy who puts their name on the ballot and gets elected by the American people." "But, you guys are elected, too, you know, co-equal branch of the government," Raju said, stopping short of discussing the system of checks and balances that prevents any one branch of government from wielding all the power.
  20. 'Stepping very close to dangerous ground': J.D. Vance triggers alarm for CNN legal expert Brad Reed ~3 minutes CNN legal analyst Elie Honig on Monday warned that Vice President J.D. Vance is nudging the United States toward total lawlessness with his suggestions that judges have no power to rule against the executive branch. While discussing Vance's weekend attacks on judges who have shot down Trump administration policies, Honig argued that the vice president was heading into uncharted territory with respect to the rule of law. J.D. Vance said over the weekend that a judge who halted Elon Musk from accessing Treasury records was overstepping their authority. "Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power," he posted on social media. "J.D. Vance is really stepping very close to dangerous ground with that statement and he knows it," he said. "The notion that the courts cannot stop the executive from doing what he wants, the notion that the executive may have the option of defying the courts, that is completely beyond even what the most extreme right-wing conservative theory in favor of broad executive power has ever argued. "Now, look, there is a very broad view of executive power, sometimes it's called the unitary executive theory, which holds essentially that the president is all-powerful within the executive branch. But even proponents of that theory do not say that the president is free to disregard an order of the court. If that were to happen, that is a line in the sand that has not been crossed." ALSO READ: 'A tax on Americans': Ex-Trump official warns he's playing with fire on economic policy Honig also predicted that, were Trump to cross this line, the United States Supreme Court would slap him down hard even though Trump himself had appointed three justices currently serving on it. "This Supreme Court has generally taken a broad view of executive power but I also think it's a mistake to say, 'Oh... they ruled in favor of Trump on immunity, they're going to do whatever he said.' They have rejected Donald Trump at many key junctures," he said. "They rejected his election fraud claims. They rejected some of his efforts to stop prosecutors from taking steps against him. They rejected his efforts to resist a subpoena. So I think this Supreme Court will not tolerate if the executive branch crosses that line of defying the courts."
×
×
  • Create New...