Jump to content

Hagbard Celine

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    17792
  • Joined

Everything posted by Hagbard Celine

  1. don't bogart that joint, my friend, pass it over to me
  2. or fcs opponents, or or or or.... the pat persona is predicting 11 aggy wins in the regular season the regular season changed from 10 to 11 regular season games in 1971 and 11 to 12 in 2010 aggy has won 11 exactly once in 1992 texas has done it 9 times you go pat
  3. i haven't seen this analysis and wanted to know so i ran it... throw out uga1, it was the only game where our "game control" was non-existent at any point we had mo in the 2nd half but were not dictating terms so break the season in half, first 6 (skip uga1) then last 6 here are some basic numbers from the box scores (ignores "should have been x" plays due to penalties, turnovers, fuckery, etc.) first 6: yards gained 3014 points scored 234 points per yard 0.463 opponents finished season 34-38 (47%) last 6: yards gained 2563 points scored 163 points per yard 0.375 opponents finished season 42-31 (57%) comparing the last half of the season to the first: yards gained -15% points per yard -19% points scored -30%
  4. barth plaintext #2451 Posted yesterday at 08:20 AM (edited) On 12/9/2024 at 6:19 PM, BevoAbyss said: Points per game in the Sark era. OFFENSE 2021: 35 points 2022: 35 points 2023: 36 points 2024: 35 points By this measure, the one that ultimately counts, Sark's offense averages 35 a game. -- Regardless of whether the QB is Casey, Hudson, or Quinn for 3 years. Zero difference or improvement across 4 years. Seems like a concern. -------------- What has improved is the points allowed. DEFENSE 2021: 29 points (5-7 record) 2022: 26 (8-5) 2023: 19 (12-2) 2024: 11 (11-2 so far) That's fantastic improvement. The defense is why Texas won 12 games last year and has 11 this year. Not Dr. Pepper Quinn or Sark's supposedly "elite" play calling. We have a 16-0 title winning defense saddled with an 8-5 offense. I love Sark, but to add to your stats, the trend shows that we can count on about 3-4 2nd half collapses per season. We survived them the last two seasons for the most part. 2021 OU: led 38-20 at half. Lost 55-48 OkSt: led 24-13 3rd qtr. lost 32-24 BU: led 21-10 3rd qtr. lost 31-24 2022 Tech: Led 31-17 3rd qtr. lost 37-34 OkSt: Led 31-17 at half. lost 41-34 KSU: Led 31-10 at half. won 34-27 2023 Hou: led 21-0 2nd qtr. won 31-24 KSU: led 27-7 3rd qtr. won 33-30 TCU: led 26-6 at half. won 29-26 2024 Vandy: led 21-7, squeaked by 27-24 Arky: led 13-0. Held on 20-10. Kentucky: not quite, but almost made the list. aggie: 17-0 at half. Tried to hand it to them. 17-7 UGA: completed dominated for two quarters and had nothing to show for it 6-3 at half time. lost 22-19 (didn’t build a big enough cushion)
  5. i thin he's sarkmocking you
  6. 58 commissions? 80000 students 2300 cosplay i get that it's the end of the 1st semester but that's it? 58?
  7. i came back with that, and the outsider retort is we are subjective because of how close we are to our program
  8. we are ballhawk city we are due for a pick 6
  9. he's not sitting out?
  10. https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/drones-texas-new-jersey-19978116.php
  11. other than the 2nd quarter against the first uga game (short fields) this has worked in every game and it's the reason we will win it all if the offense unfucks itself if we had a punter we'd be even more dangerous note: florida snagged the michigan punter in the portal dammit
  12. other helmet school fan I talk to a lot: 5. Sark trusts Quinn more than Arch against league/playoff opponents, i.e. Arch lighting up OOC and game-managing league-bottom opponents doesn't guarantee he is ready to do it in December and we have no choice but to trust in Sark. not my opinion (i think it's #4) but psa how an outsider sees it
  13. Tyler Rogoway @Aviation_Intel Mailbox/DMs etc full of people asking why we are not reporting on the drone stuff considering we broke all this over many years. We are! But we have not been doing a play by play as the story has totally gone off the rails with reality and major news stories have developed elsewhere (Syria for instance). The main stream media has no clue what they are talking about on this issue, none, and most outlets largely don't seem to care. Local officials are very poor sources in terms of quality info on this issue. This is not a dig on them at all, it's just there is not an in-house knowledge base there that understands it, just facets of it, not anywhere near a whole picture. This is a very complex issue with many technological facets. You don't just call in a 'drone guy' and get briefed. We have ran into this issue many times. The U.S. gov messaging on this has been so absurdly poor and frankly dangerous, there is a story there we are working on, but that isn't all that surprising. This has been the way it has been for years, but at least the denials have finally evaporated. Nearly every video I have seen has pointed to mass hysteria not a drone invasion of massive scale, with airliners, private jets, and helicopters being portrayed as mysterious objects. These videos are peddled for engagement by a growing number of online accounts. This is very unfortunate, because there does seem to be something going on here, but zero critical thought, even on a most basic level of the 'evidence' only fuels rumors and fear. It also clogs the channels for relevant evidence to break through. This is true on a public consumption and governmental/investigative level. It also puts aircraft in danger. We often break this stuff but let others with far more resources run with the ball once it's out there. For years people didn't believe this was happening at all. So now we are here, exactly where I said we would end up. We hopefully will be doing a roundup to get up to speed a bit but we are working on several unique angles to this story that aren't being covered. So stay tuned for that. I have a piece coming on something that needs to be said. But beware of the prevailing narrative and especially what you see portrayed on social media, this is now a hype train and everyone is jumping on, and many are doing so for the wrong reasons. I applaud those that are doing the opposite. And remember the government at all levels is not a reliable source for information on this topic. Scary, I know. It is what it is. Thanks for reading as always! Last edited 10:35 AM · Dec 11, 2024 · 107K Views
  14. the laws of physics and spacetime prevented it it's an article about aggy having to play 2 sec road games back to back and the wailing and lamentation of their women he can't mention Texas because..... TEXAS ALSO PLAYS 2 SEC ROAD GAMES BACK TO BACK this HERCULEAN TASK of 2 road games, combined with no FCS opponent, a trip to the shoe on opening day with no warmup, and the first 4 league games away from home, equates to a schedule ranked 13th conversely... aggy get 2 warmups before their trip to south bend, open league play with 3 in a row at home, and have a bye week and a fcs opponent in november BUT WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! they have to travel to fayettenam!!!!!!!! well, maybe if they hadn't been such bitches about having the first UT game at pyle, snakey would have fixed this for them too we're 13th, they're 8th
  15. aggy will now have to confront the reality of over-selling pyle capacity 30000 students
  16. i'll take lsu on T+1 thank you aggy can rot in hell will the gallery grant me the privilege of calling aggy aggy?
  17. put me on ignore
  18. welp welp welp how the turntables why the fuck isn't this in the US/MSM press? https://hongkongfp.com/2024/12/12/chinese-national-arrested-after-allegedly-flying-drone-over-us-military-base/ https://petapixel.com/2024/12/12/chinese-national-arrested-for-taking-drone-images-of-us-space-force-base/
  19. "new" flagship schools we play 24/25 gatah lube pig uga that means we should get home games in 26 with 2 of: cock corndog creamsicle gump i would prefer to ditch aggy and pig so we can at least 2 of that group in 26 at home
  20. i modeled this a few years ago will see if i can find it
  21. there is no reason why these can't be night games eSiPn can just deal with it we acquiesced to aggy whining for 2 years about the first game being at pyle our turn to get what we want when it is totally within the bounds of reason
  22. had not thought of that that explains it
  23. what is their nil situation? public ivy like us has to have cigars are they organized? is 4m to 12m the actual situation/probability and what are they up against in the acc - what are clemson's and miami's numbers
  24. i'm trying to game this out if we are flying our own stuff over our own DoD sites - and in the UK in addition to the US and then throwing up our hands "ermagherd drones are flying over our DoD sites" the only purpose i can discern is to test the larger overall societal reaction to something: ? the concept of being surveilled from the sky ? ? the concept of UAPs cruising around everywhere ? i'm not saying either of those explain what's going on i'll also note that the NBC report showed a graphic asserting drone reports on the west coast and over 'nuclear' sites in the mountain west take away the "ermagherd" part and us flying our own secret shit over our own DoD sites to test how well is works makes sense so why make a big deal about it? we've had UAP/UFO incursions over DoD sites for decades, both in the US and in the UK
×
×
  • Create New...