89Horn

There is no like, dislike or defending in what I posted. Is the stat misleading? Perhaps, but at least incomplete. I added what occurred in those games - winning all but one of those games - irrespective of the poor offensive production in the second halves of those games. That is what happened. If you disagree, then post the final game scores of those games and let me know if we actually ended up losing them. Maybe I got that wrong.

Sorry. I didn’t know that I was responding to you. The other person I was responding to wants more than competency.

Yes, that is what has happened in those games. Doesn’t contradict anything I said. We have won all the games but one when outscored in the third quarter. The narrative is accurate as a continuation of the tweet you posted. We all understand that you want Texas to win every game 50-0 and particularly wanting Quinn to go per game 35/35 with 450 yard of perfect passing, 5 TD passes, and run for another 2 with oh just a measles 85 yards rushing (no yards lost on sacks). That isn’t happening. We are where we are. I may not like it either, but that ain’t likely happening any time soon.

Ok, let’s finish off this narrative - . . . and Texas lost only one of those games when being outscored in the third quarter (Georgia in the SEC CG). Of interesting note, Texas outscored Georgia 15-0 in the third quarter of their first meeting in Austin in October. What does all this mean? The trend is that Texas typically builds a lead in the first half against its opponents and then hangs on to win in the second half with a bounce back in the fourth quarter. There. Done.

For those on the list . . . Too soon?

Ok. Well if that’s the case, then instead of our typical tunnel entrance, I say put in a grass ramp from the second level balcony just above the “Campbell-Williams Field” sign and put the mounted horns at the top for all the players see and tap as they run down the ramp. I think that would be special, you know, if mandated to allow Clemson an entrance video.

So, what’s your point?

Yeah, I get that. That’s why I used the phrase “if we could have developed” what referencing a run game.

I largely don’t disagree with you, but just maybe and this might sound crazy, but perhaps things turn out differently if we could have developed some sort of run game. Maybe we run for a TD in the red zone rather than having to rely on the pass. When you don’t have a run game then your opposition can pass interfere knowing that what follows will be more passes.

I mean, right? Clemson ranks 75th in rushing defense, 60th in passing defense, and 65th in total defense. Anyone can take a blueprint, but not everyone can build (execute) on the design if you don’t have the same tools. That looks more like aggy than Georgia’s defense to me.

Not to worry. Aggy will effectively respond with one or a combination of some boycott, a sternly worded letter to the powers behind setting the game time, an open records request (if applicable), skewing some online poll denouncing the start time, and the always popular - blaming Texas for the reason the game is starting so late.

So, do we know if TNT is going to have any pregame shows or activities maybe simulcasting ESPN? Otherwise, are we seeing a “Friends” or “NCIS: New Orleans” marathon leading into the game?

Are you James Franklin? Basically, that’s his opinion. Everyone play the same number of conference games, everyone needs to be in a conference (looking at you Notre Dame), and every conference should have or not have a conference championship game. I think that is a good take.

Every team is out to get UCLA. It’s chalked up as an easy W.