Jump to content

Monster

Full Members
  • Posts

    532
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Monster

  1. This was my reaction as well. In the end, the 'hauntings' seemed like they were thrown in there to break up the Theater-esque monlogues and sibling arguments. Like, someone wrote a family drama for the stage, then said, lets add ghosts and turn it into a 8 hour tv show. Pretty successful as a drama, but as a fan of horror--thought it was cliched and slapped together. (Our scene is stalling...let's bang on the walls!) Also agree with the guy who said he thought the young dad character was a demon at the start.
  2. Monster

    UCF

    You really need 4 divisions if you want to properly represent where college football is right now. 1. SEC (As long as their deal with ESPN lasts) 2. Traditional power schools in the other P5 conferences (teams that can qualify with 1 loss...Texas, OU, Ohio St, etc) 3. P5 conference schools without 'tradition' (the other 30 teams that are auto-disqualified with 1 loss...WV, Wash St., etc) 4. G5 and everybody else who will never, ever, ever be allowed a chance.
  3. Monster

    UCF

    Will they get an invitation to ESPN's super secret three game tournament? No they will not. Will UCF prove to everyone that 80% of teams in division I football are excluded now and forever from ESPN's 'playoff'? Yes they will. Does excluding 80% of a league delegitimize your three game invitational tourny as an actual vehicle to crown a national champion? Absolutely. ESPN's tournament will, however, crown the best team out of the 15-25 teams with 'traditional programs', large viewerships, and.or business ties to their network. But no, UCF will not be invited to play in ESPN's tournament this year, or any year. Sorry, other 85 Universities, your football programs don't matter.
  4. And if you swap out Miami for a 9th conference game....then you're OOC is SE LA, LA tech, and Rice.
  5. UCF should apologize to all the teams on their schedule. Every time they win a game, ESPN is obligated to make a few disparaging comments about whoever they just beat.
  6. Here come the graphics to explain why 80% of the college football teams are excluded from the 'playoff' system. Fuck you ESPN. Fuck you. Gonna go back to watching this on the reddit streams.
  7. Yeah, was wondering how they'd rule that. Defensive guy definitely lowed his head, but so did the runner.
  8. Cinci QB demonstrating why its probably best to slide when you scramble.
  9. UCF defense looking pretty salty. They haven't given up a point yet. Touchdown in the first quarter was a fumble in the endzone.
  10. Texas vs Iowa St might've been in the prime time ABC slot if not for the uh...thing. I'd be highly entertained if this game pulled a huge viewership and the longhorn network accidentally proved UCF is a big enough tv draw to get them into a playoff. I don't honestly think any of that will happen, but the potential for it pleases me.
  11. I'm really surprised they gave them this prime time slot. Maybe they are checking to see how many people will actually watch UCF? If they get good numbers, maybe UCF gets a little more consideration. Of course they have to win the game...
  12. It'll be interesting to hear how ESPN/commentators deal with the fact that UCF looks really, really good. It is against their business interests for UCF to be good, so I expect them to post a lot of graphs and charts devaluing UCF's season. But it's also their prime time game, so...pissing all over UCF would look pretty weird. If it stays like this, second half commentary will be interesting.
  13. It looks like UCF could just run that play every down and it'll score 33% of the time.
  14. UCF has some serious speed I didn't realize UCF was that big. ESPN said 60k+ enrollment? Did I hear that right?
  15. So you clicked on a thread to ask people why they are watching a football game....between two top 25 teams.
  16. Was 99% sure this was a loss for OSU at halftime. Great adjustments by Gundy. He's a good coach. Corndog almost threw the game away on an out-of-bounds INT and missed a few open guys in the second half, but those runs were clutch and the old man did hit a couple of big passes. Entire last drive was amazing. Defense played well all game against a Heisman hopeful QB. Very glad I was wrong.
  17. Great job Corndog. I still don't trust you, but that was a clutch drive. Happy for the fifth year senior. Nice little run after the catch by Wallace there.
  18. OSU field goal kicker has already contributed to 2 losses....Need to punch it in
  19. lol, throws it into the dirt with a WR standing there wide open 10 yards away.
  20. Running Cornelius > Passing Cornelius
  21. He's very inaccurate. Downfield passes, he's probably 2-30 this year. And its very common to hear announcers talk about wide open receivers that he didn't see. He threw 2 bad INT's that led to scores in this game, and almost threw a third that would have likely ended the game. But he's a very solid runner. And he'll have a series once a half, where he's accurate and good. But he's overthrown dozens of automatic touchdowns and usually misses his target by several feet. (Just look at the missed 2 pt conversion last week against OU)
  22. Tight end using a cheat code there.
  23. I absolutely hate the fade route in the endzone. It's never worked all year. Except today it's worked both times for 14 points. 3 point game!
×
×
  • Create New...