Jump to content

washparkhorn

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    9941
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by washparkhorn

  1. I think it's part of the urban/flyover country divide. Fly by the seat of their pants appears to be the rule in Kenosha. In real life, good lawyers worry about evidence and admissibility before a trial. Disputes are handled with pretrial motions (motions in limine) to include or exclude evidence - not when the jury has the case.
  2. Apparently you have been called out a someone who struggles with intelligence, if I am reading between the lines correctly. Don't take that head down/ass up is apparently the suggestion from @elguapo
  3. The "i don't know what a .mov file is" is not a good look for the legal profession. Clowns indeed.
  4. Local Yokel lawyering (both sides). And a judge unable to untangle the mess created by the lawyers. That poor jury twiddling their thumbs waiting for lawyers and a judge to talk about Tucker Carlson evidence. Rule of thumb for civilians - the jury can use the exhibits while deliberating. The judge is correct on that principle of law.
  5. The judge is making sense regarding the province of the jury to re-watch the videos.
  6. Thank you for posting that @Johnny Sack.
  7. This morning the jury requested to view videos admitted into evidence. They appear to be resolving unknowns or points of disagreement - or they just want to see it again to validate beliefs/disbeliefs. It slows the process down, generally. It's common. But it may be also the jury agreeing with each other, but there is one loose end they want to cleanup, which, in that case, they could decide minutes after re-watching the footage.
  8. Drama
  9. And punchable face. I need to get my Thetans tested again.
  10. They shouldn't be doing that, but it is what it is - and they probably will speculate on the impact of their decision. Not guilty or guilty, it is best that they go through the evidence in painstaking detail.
  11. 12 Angry Men is a fantastic movie. As for the lawyering and judging, Col. Potter is similar to the Rittenhouse judge.
  12. The jury wants to see videos. Could be a while.
  13. Traditionally, quick verdicts were seen as signs of guilty and longer verdicts favored the defense. I am not sure those metrics are proven true by research. Some juries take their responsibilities seriously and take longer.
  14. The poor jury is waiting and the judge is filibustering. He certainly has a lot of opinions on meta issues.
  15. Potential Brady violation (deprivation of due process for the Defendant). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/260_waifagsn.pdf (Remedies for Brady violation)
  16. The videos are already in evidence. The Monday Defense motion to dismiss based on the failure to provide HD footage is under advisement.
  17. The judge has a case of Incipient Verbal Diarrhea.
  18. So no support at 59? Damn. How does one trade on the volatility of crypto?
  19. It's an interesting psychological phenomenon. People know it isn't true, but it heightens their interest so willingly choose to act as if the story is real. Wasn't a key part of the slender man tale a murder in Wisconsin of a young girl? On brand, I suppose.
  20. The daily mail link has nothing to do with the jumpkick man. Stop Q'ing up Surly.
  21. Isn't there already a Crypto political thread? Use it. ________________ Back to BTC, is there support at 59?
  22. That's not the jumpkick man issue. The jumpkick man was withheld story comes from a radio talk show host in Wisconsin. https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2021-11-16-the-disturbing-story-of-the-rittenhouse-cases-mysterious-jump-kick-man/ "The Dan O'Donnell Show" can now report exclusively that Jump Kick Man is a 40-year-old Black male from Kenosha with an extensive criminal record who was at the time of the Rittenhouse shootings on probation following a conviction for domestic violence battery. He faced a maximum sentence of nine months in jail, but less than two months before he kicked Rittenhouse, he accepted a plea deal that netted him 12 months' probation. The following year, he violated the terms of his probation and was sentenced to seven months in jail. This story is being promoted by Q-friendly websites like Tiger Droppings, and apparently Surly now. https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/o-t-lounge/rittenhouse-jump-kick-man-has-been-identified/99625106/
×
×
  • Create New...