Jump to content

Player

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    2114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Player

  1. Have an extra pair (free) in Sec. 131 to see us sweep the helobiouses tonight. PM if you want them.
  2. And no astroglide either from the looks of it.
  3. I have one extra if anyone wants to go tonight. Send PM if you're interested.
  4. The t-shirt giveaway is sponsored by HEB. I wonder if she sued them as well.
  5. What revolver? I know during one of the first press conferences Art referenced a .357 revolver. But when they catalogued the weapons that were recovered, my recollection was that a .357 revolver was not listed. Maybe this was subsequently clarified and I missed it, but it stuck out to me at the time as one more thing that HPD lied about.
  6. I’ll be there, but not sure when. Waiting on my son to drive in from Austin.
  7. As well they should. Nobody’s buying tickets to go see the umps, and jackasses like this are bad for the game. The “I can do whatever the fuck I want” remark, coupled with the prior instances of being a little bitch, is pretty damning evidence that he’s lost his perspective.
  8. I’ve never seen any merchandise for an opponent in the team stores at MMP. Not saying it’s never happened, but I sure don’t recall ever seeing Rangers gear for sale at our park. I’ve been to every MLB Park, and other than a few stores that sold all team caps (like a Lids), I don’t recall seeing other team merchandise for sale at any of them.
  9. NFL: 258 att 147 comp 7 TD 7 INT 1,675 yards CFL: 165 att 106 comp 5 TD 7 INT 1,290 yards AAF: 8 att 5 comp 0 TD 1 INT 61 yards
  10. Right about now it’s about that time for me to holla. Girl I wanna waller in the back of my Impala. Woo, don’t need no tickets for this thang. Just jump on in, let me hit them switches on the train. And it ain’t no thang, it’s all the same.
  11. People who drone on and on about some inane point, and then feign indignation when others don’t express admiration for what amounts to them sniffing their own farts.
  12. Curly - hoping you can clarify one more issue for me. I thought I heard them say last night that although none of the samples that were tested for DNA matched Adnan, there was at least one sample where there was a "hit", but unfortunately it was for someone whose DNA is not in any law enforcement registry. My question is which sample did the hit come from? Have DNA samples ever been collected from Don or Alonzo Sellers?
  13. People who complain about hot lesbians in movies.
  14. Keep your goddamn hands off my joke!
  15. I never listened to any of the podcast, so thanks for the clarification curly. If the fax cover sheet was not discovered until after the deadline for Adnan's initial petition for post-conviction relief had already passed, then I'm at a loss for how the appellate court could have construed that against him as a waiver. If anything, it would seem akin to newly discovered evidence that could serve as the basis for a new trial. I'm also curious about what Adnan's team may do with the results of the DNA tests. Hopefully the next round of briefing will be an "everything but the kitchen sink" effort.
  16. I haven’t read the opinion from the Maryland Court of Appeals, but it seems as though no consideration was given to Adnan’s effort to challenge the accuracy of the state’s timeline vis a vis the cell tower records. https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-ci-syed-appeal-20190222-story.html Apparently, because this argument wasn’t raised in the post-conviction petition for relief, the court ruled that it had been waived. I don’t recall exactly when or even who on Adnan’s team figured out that incoming calls could not be used to reliably establish locations. Was that information known prior to the deadline to file the post-conviction petition? Regardless, the state’s case essentially falls apart if the cell phone records (and timeline) are placed in their proper context. It’s a harsh result to say the least, and sure doesn’t seem like justice. Is this argument dead in the water? Or can it be raised in a motion for reconsideration in state court? Or raised in federal court?
  17. No man. Her insides were a rocky place where his seed could find no purchase.
  18. That may very well be what Mitch hears. But every single time this thread gets bumped, I immediately start hearing yakety-sax.
  19. There's not a lot of time to "let it die down", as the clock is ticking on the deadline to file an appeal. I believe it's due within 14 days of receipt of the notice of violation.
  20. Strom is awesome - really funny guy.
×
×
  • Create New...