Jump to content

dcar00

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    39684
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

18895 Surly 1%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. yeah, I was making a joke but they do anyway - see ND.
  2. nah, we just need to go 7-2 in SEC(which we can do no problem) and not lose OOC games.
  3. good stuff. unfortunately it is clear the committee doesn't consider entire resume or SOS or SOR or wins . If someone asked that dumbass from Arkansas what about Texas close loss to Ohio State he'd a) point to Florida and b) say that was early in the season. Which would be funny because that would be our entire point but he so fucking dumb I can guarantee he would say it. our close wins get scrutinized but our close losses are just normal losses/bad losses to these guys. anyway, don't lose 3 games and set your schedule to your advantage and beat every team by as much as possible no matter who they are. it is obvious a SOS in the 40's means absolutely ZERO to the committee. our SOS will never be in the 40's. As an aside, The rivalry game thing cracks me up. the dumbass Arkansas AD actually used it for Alabama who barely beat(with ref help) a 5-7 rival. And of course avoided it when it is Texas crushing rivals by 10+ including 2 rivals who are playoff teams and his own fucking shitty ass football team. The whole thing is ridiculous. cancel the OOC blue bloods, schedule a mid or lower P4 and get ready for conf games. christ we can spend time game planning to beat our conf teams instead of game planning a ton for a first game of the season with a blueblood.
  4. That would be great if the committee actually considered top 10 or top 25 wins at all.
  5. you forgot the committee rule "only consider Texas' close wins when discussing comparable opponents"
  6. yep. I think someone upthread mentioned ND was sending packets out to media also. They knew what was coming because they didn't beat anyone worth a shit.
  7. it is just so obvious. the moving us over Vandy is obvious so they could say us and Vandy were comparable and use H2H and "show" that it isn't about loss column. this is so fucking ridiculous. showing us against ND and Miami would make them look like dumbasses for not putting us in.
  8. counterpoint: they are Vandy
  9. yes several things called wins. let me see if I can find a committee metric on "squeakers". oh there isn't. there is actually a statement that "margin of victory" is not considered.
  10. how do you decide which teams are comparable before you use the SOS, H2H, injured players, common opponents?
  11. It's funny how little the committee values our win over #3 and undefeated aggy.
  12. Bama completely shitting the bed against dirt burglar fucked all kinds of shit up.
  13. I'll be shocked it we are higher than 10 even if we beat Michigan.
  14. I've summarized the AI for accuracy
  15. the idiocy of Hunter Yurachek is perfect for Arkansas. so you rank teams and if they end up side by side, THEN you figure out if they played each other?
×
×
  • Create New...