Jump to content

dcar00

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    35300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dcar00

  1. They put SMU in because they wanted to avoid SECSECSEC Bias pure and simple. The had no choice with Big 10 because the only 2 loss team was tOSU. Indiana and the Big 10's overall shittiness fucked a lot of shit up.
  2. so so funny. the only 3 loss team is the bid stealer. Loss column rules all just like 90 years ago. The great thing about this is all the conf have a chance. we should have been at 8 teams 25 years ago. we might have another NC or 2.
  3. I would have rather had SMU and Jennings than Klubnick. Clemson has athletes that could rise to the occasion but if we can't be Clemson at home then whatever. need Banks back and Sark to get a real red zone package and then ride.
  4. There never has been. The loss column rules all. the situation with us, Bama, and FSU last year was unique. Had we played someone reasonably tough other than Bama(like Oregon) it would have been Bama and FSU with us left out.
  5. bottom line, we were fucking up the narrative. just like Nebraska. Nobody in the SEC wants to get Nebraska'd. I am sure Sark is aware of exactly what is going on.
  6. he is not defenseless, he is a runner and not sliding.
  7. maybe. Lawrence also got an invite but never kicked in the pros. We rolled the dice with Bert and got burned. from his first year it was obvious he didn't have the leg and his accuracy was suspect. A lot of people just look at the stats but he was very erratic even on his makes. when he needs a longer FG he has to put more into it and I think that is why you see the hooks from the right hash. He has pushed a few too. just like a golfer he's constantly overcorrecting when he swings harder. He's good from inside 45 and I mean good as in "for a college kicker". that all said. Sark needs to solve his red zone issues against good D's so he isn't depending on kickers. We also constantly take sacks that push us back to the edge of Bert's real range(45).
  8. I want the 5 to potentially get SMU.. A big DL is the only thing I see stopping us.
  9. my guess is 6 but we could be 7. too much push to not give Texas the 5 because we lost to Georgia twice. plus ND is the obvious other choice for 5. If Bama had the same resume as we do there would be no doubt they are the 5.
  10. AP Poll trying their best to get ND the 5 as well.
  11. yep. There is obviously a narrative that opposing coaches are using with the refs and it only applies to us/Sark when we run outside zone and maul people.
  12. They sooooo want ND to get the sweet 5 seed. It is hilarious.
  13. Smart never calls any plays or anything. 90% of the game is spent working calls from the refs while charging onto the field like a gaping vagina, just like Carroll used to do. We might want to try that. We we should be in the ear of every ref on the field bitching about missed holds, lining up in the neutral zone, DPI, OPI. All fucking game long. It is a coaching failure not to. Georgia never had to deal with a hold bringing back a big play once. We had a huge play to about the 15 I think with Blue that also had a facemask but of course a bullshit hold was called and that was that. SEC tried to fuck us in the aggy game too but the booth fixed the fuckery. there is no booth to fix BS holding and DPI calls(or non calls).
  14. Good article. The key line "coaches don't trust their QB's, they have points already". It is a bullshit caoch bailout call, especially with our receivers, who aren't tall.
  15. Bert has been bailed out by our O and D before. This is the first time(maybe there was one his first year) that the game really did come down to his misses. Georgia would have gone for it on 4th had we been up 6 but I'd take our D in that situation all day long. Fera?
  16. I HATE THE FUCKING FADE AT THE GOAL LINE. It is such a bullshit call that is rarely completed in college and certainly by us.
  17. They claim we turned them in on the pay for play deal...
  18. I'm going to guess Kirby Smart since the dude is always on the fucking field.
  19. Ewers is a disaster in the red zone but we move the ball on them. I'm ready to line up with Georgia any time. we just took them to OT. Any game that doesn't have us giving them 40 yard fields to score is a coin flip. Ou D absolutely crushed them in the 1st half and was fine against them the 2H of the first game.
  20. we aren't the better team but there is no reason to think any game with them is not a coin flip. we've played them basically even the last 6 quarters and that was an away game for us. PK made a mistake not loading up on the run IMO. make the guy beat you in the air. their WR's are kinda meh. Sark needs to trust Manning in the red zone.
  21. ready made story lines about how Texas caused the death penalty, Texas kept SMU out of the Big 12, Texas did this and that to SMU...etc.
  22. agree but we didn't play Bama this year so I think that is why they might do it.
  23. Thats why I want it. Big Bad Texas getting a huge benefit is the only thing that will move the needle to change this to "conf champs get in, but we rank 1-12". Kirby Smart will be breaking down doors of the CFP and throwing laptops around the room. To be fair, I think SMU, Boise, and ASU are all salty teams and could beat anyone in the field on a particular day but I think we can beat them on the lines, which only Georgia has been able to do. I would love to run the table with that draw. play Georgia's backup in the final, win it all and watch the complete meltdown.
  24. agree. I think the committee should send a signal that we don't give a shit about ND but they won't. the problem with 6 is the only logical 11 team is Bama, 7 pits us with Georgia in quarters. my guess is we get 6 against Bama. I love how the number of losses matters greatly but who you lost to and where matters so little.
×
×
  • Create New...