Jump to content

Crusher

banned
  • Posts

    873
  • Joined

Everything posted by Crusher

  1. Gorsuch was to replace Scalia. One conservative for another. No big deal. No huge effort against him was a way for the liberals to act they weren't really totally deranged. Kavanaugh for Kennedy? No way!! Kennedy was swing vote. Dems were all over him like a duck on june bug. Right out of the gate. “In selecting Judge Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, President Trump has put reproductive rights and freedoms and health care protections for millions of Americans on the judicial chopping block. … I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same.” — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. http://www.thegardenisland.com/2018/07/09/news/quotes-on-brett-kavanaughs-nomination-to-the-supreme-court/
  2. and let me answer myself again… Do not listen to this asshole . He has unmasked himself in this thread . He will not answer any real questions . His goal is to destroy a good man.
  3. Jesus!! What do you want partisan fuck head? I was willing to let it go. What do you want asshole?
  4. I don't expect to see you on this thread again..OK..
  5. I mean it was Yale... I'm sure there are other folks currently serving in the Government?
  6. Exactly what I was talking about earlier. The longer the Dems can let this hang around the more chances that the media and the left will get a whack at this guy. Who else was a member of that Club?
  7. OK you and some bitch with a thumbs up agree with trashing a mans life with ZERO evidence. Cool. And BTW "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information."
  8. Context and Blah, blah blah. Hell yes I know what the discussion is about!! Do you? The discussion is about a mans life and you say... "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information."
  9. "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information." After that quote why should I engage with you? You have made your point clear. You will not listen to a reasonable argument. All I have ever tried to do is state my opinions in a respectful manner. I never attacked you in personal way. Until now. FUCK YOU !!! You know what you said . Own up and be a man.
  10. "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information."
  11. "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information."
  12. "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information."
  13. "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information." Don't really see any other way to interpret the words you typed? Unless there is another version of English. Perhaps English 2.0?
  14. "I don’t give a shit whether the purpose is to truly gather information." Well there you have it. You don't care about the truth. You are just using this woman to advance you own political agenda. Thanks for admitting the truth for a change.
  15. Do you really think a committee hearing in this day and age is about getting information? It's about destroying the other party's candidate. It didn't used to be this way. Look at past votes on Supreme Court Justices. Hell, Ginsburg was 96-3 and she is about far left as any of you fucking communists could come up with in your wet dreams. https://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/nominations/reverseNominations.htm I wish the people of the USA could come to some kind of agreement in the future. If we don't I fear we will destroy the greatest experiment in democracy that the world has ever seen. I am 50 yro. This is our time. This our responsibility. If we fuck this up we have no one to blame but ourselves.
  16. So judicial rules don't apply anymore? Well a lot of the deplorables and outright morons in the USA...USA...USA. Have made up their minds. We will see if the Dem strategy or the Reps ends up working here.
  17. The jury will be public opinion of course. People will make up their own minds. At this point I think most already have.
  18. Suddenly she can't fly... Better hope that the investigators aren't looking into whether or not she has taken a flight since 1983.
  19. I disagree. Especially if it is broadcast for the public.
  20. Your obviously not that much of a dolt. I have read your posts around here and at Shaggy. You are a smart guy. So I will answer your question. With several questions.. Do you really think it would have ended there with just Thursday? No more ridiculous demands? No Senators asking questions? No Kavanaugh in the room. What happened to be able to face your accuser? Then the most egregious demand...he testifies first? That is straight from the USSR playbook.
  21. If I am correct in my theory that she never intended on testifying and this was just a stall / slander tactic by the Dems then fuck her testimony. On the other hand... If this accusation actually happened and she really can't remember what year this happened, where it happened , who else was at the party outside that room where this supposed event happened and all of the people who were supposed to be in the room at the time of the event deny being there. Despite all that , this accusation was true.... Well then I would be sorry that she didn't get a chance to testify.
  22. Horse shit!! If she wanted to testify she would have stepped forward in July. She wanted to stay anonymous until Feinstein doxed her ass.
×
×
  • Create New...