Posts posted by David Dennison
-
-
5 minutes ago, Alvin89 said:
" He is Hillary in 2020." Hillary was never President, see the video above.
He's going to be the more hated candidate that people want to vote against. The Democrats can throw anyone up there and Donald Trump will be the underdog in this election. He probably wants it that way.
I think he's going to lose by a large margin.
But he might win.
-
-
10 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:
JimmyJazz on JimmyJazz violence vis a vis reckless claims of racism as a "tap out" move is actually the draining of the swamp.
Well done ladies.
Trump will walk into a second term, probably from the golf course.
Y'all can't help yourselves.
He's the underdog in 2020.
-
-
-
-
Just now, DixonHur said:
She doesn't need to get elected...she IS the Speaker of the House.
Because she got elected. Because her caucus thinks she's good at it. A whole lot of people agree. Many don't. I understand why.
If history is any indication, the Democrats will hold their majority in the House in 2020. I can't wait to see if the left wing of the party puts up a viable challenger to Nancy Pelosi. I hope they do. I just don't think anyone can beat her.
-
1 minute ago, DixonHur said:
That's a very defeatist attitude, IMO.
Hey, I've got a novel idea. How about doing what's best for the country instead of her clique? That's 100% the definition of party over country.
Good thing the founding fathers had more of a spine than Aunt Nancy or we'd still be saluting the Union Jack.
That would be great. But the person who does that will never be elected Speaker of the House.
-
3 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Euromaidan Ukraine 2013 or something like it. Or the Senate works out a deal for Trump to resign without prosecution. Some combination of public backlash and mobilization and congressional action to force Trump out. The Senate would never convict.
Sounds ridiculous but isn’t if the public was compelled to take the Mueller Report seriously.
It does sound ridiculous, I'll give you that.
-
-
Edited by David Dennison
16 minutes ago, Captainant said:I hate your definition of politics that is "to be as self-serving and self-interested as possible, completely disregarding the will of the people in the pursuit of more money". I hate that when the dems get into power, all they can do is put the same fucking leadership in place that led the party into historically poor electoral outcomes in 2012-2016.
I'm starting to be convinced that you're just trolling all of us, because you offer zero explanation to the strategy or reasoning for the seemingly insane decisions being made by party leadership except for "wElL tHaTs JuSt PoLiTiCs huuuuu drrrrrrrr".
It's not my definition. It's the way it is.
I've given you numerous reasons why Nancy Pelosi does what she does. It's all geared toward keeping the Democratic majority in the House and beating Donald Trump in 2020. She believes she is doing what's best for her caucus and the country in that regard. You disagree. That's all.
-
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
I get that but when our sworn public servants, especially the top cop in America start lying to the public regarding the biggest scandal in the history of the presidency, it’s crossing the rubicon into another world.
Sessions wouldn’t it, Comey wouldn’t do it, Rosenstein wouldn’t do it, Yates wouldn’t do it, McCabe wouldn’t do it, Coates wouldn’t do it, Wray wouldn’t do it, not even big dick toilet salesman Whitaker would do it.
But Bill Barr? He did it.
Which is why Donald Trump is a Republican Party problem.
-
-
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Successful removal does not equal conviction in the senate. That would never happen. The battlefield is public opinion. If it got bad enough, anything could happen. The Democrats would have needed to do some heavy lifting too for Trump to be ousted over the Mueller Report.
Are you saying Donald Trump would have resigned if the Mueller Report was presented to the public with no spin from the AG?
-
-
1 hour ago, Captainant said:
She's going to capitulate. Centrist/establishment dems and their fluffers like dennison will say it's good politics despite it being the exact opposite of what people voted for in the blue wave. And the dems will continue to pass all sorts of meaningless, do-nothing legislation in the house while abdicating their responsibilities of checks and balances.
You just hate politics.
And that's OK.
-
49 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
The Mueller report was the one shot to pull off a successful removal of Trump but they needed to act quickly and with a sense of urgency. Barr knew this and that’s why he sandbagged with the ludicrous and misleading Barr letter.
Granted, there’s a good chance it would not have been successful anyway but Trump’s people were obviously freaked out enough to get Bill Barr to go full coverup general and leave nothing to chance.
The facts and evidence in the Mueller Report are still there waiting to be used to prosecute Trump. I think they will be.
You can't be serious.
-
10 minutes ago, NowThis said:
exactly, but illegal aliens were not to be counted, correct?
Look, i know everyone is tying this to Trump hatred, but the issue is much bigger, he's just a temporary blip. Illegals should not be counted in any measure involving political representation. They can however be counted for government assistance programs (a liberal idea), no problem with that.
Undocumented workers should be counted for the census. They should also count for political representation. They should not get to vote.
-
-
-
-
3 minutes ago, retread said:
I hope triple and DD are right, but I'm not optimistic. By late fall or early '20, the Mueller report will be ancient history.
The House could open impeachment at a later date, but the momentum has already slipped away from them imo.
There is a very real possibility that Donald Trump is not going to be impeached. People should get used to that.
But also, he might get impeached.
-
-
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
in Cloak Room
·
Edited by David Dennison
nm