-
Posts
42376 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by David Dennison
-
-
Just now, GSU&UT said:
Holy fuck David, maybe everyone else noticed this before me but you are the biggest party over country Democrat here. Just fuck off with every single retort of "that's how Washington works" garbage.
Just a cynic and a realist.Â
You can't do anything without power. Party gets you power. That's the way it is and it's never going to change.
-
3 minutes ago, Captainant said:
Oh sorry, how is Nancy trying to make money off this? That's what it's all about, right? Not doing the right thing, just getting more dolla dolla bills y'all. Its how you get elected, I hear
Mick Mulvaney sees this as an opportunity to get rid of someone who isn't conservative enough for his taste. He can't fire him, though. Donald Trump has to do that. This is a pretext for getting someone else in at labor who will deregulate faster.
Morality has nothing to do with it.
-
Just now, Captainant said:
Â
That awkward moment that Mick fucking Mulvaney has more moral fiber than Nancy pelosi on an issue
It has nothing to do with moral fiber.Â
But you already knew that.
-
2 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:
wtf is the deal with home depot? I guess I failed to login to liberal.com today. I have no idea what the orange dumbshit is talking about.Â
It's always something with conservative snowflakes.Â
-
9 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:
wtf is this "becky" shit. I didn't get the memo.  Is it like "barbie" for uglier women?
It's what black women call white women. Lots of Becky talk on black twitter and The Root.
I think they should just call them all honky because honky is hilarious.
-
1 minute ago, TornACL said:
I've never been a big supporter of reparations, because it's another example of treating the symptoms and not the illness. What's the point of making reparations if you're still putting people in shitty schools and letting policemen shoot them for driving on an expired license? It's just bullshit window dressing.
That said, at this point I'm in favor of anything that causes outrage among uptight conservative racist assholes.
How bout this.Â
No white people on juries anymore.
Ever.
Kidding.
Sorta.
-
-
Just now, TwiceHorn said:
You're right that the administrative burdens and the shitshow that would produce pretty much outweigh any moral justification and are a manifestation of the attenuation of the whole thing. It's too damned late, basically.
There is no country on earth that lacks a history of discrimination against some group. Is there a precedent for reparations somewhere?
The Holocaust.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Mojo Hand said:
For. Not cutting checks per se, but targeted government investments to remediate the continuing effects of slavery and the Jim Crow era on people today.  One example might be addressing the racial gap in home ownership through special mortgage tax credits, or down payment assistance, or something else along those lines.Â
Other examples:
Disparity in incarceration rates, unemployment rates, education rates, mortality, infant mortality, poverty, hunger, etc., etc.
Â
-
33 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
Agin it.
Â
Tex archer spells it out pretty well. If we're going to give black folks money then logically the native Americans are due a shit load as well, if not more. Our gov't genocided them out of existence in some cases.
Honkies have a lot to answer for.
-
17 minutes ago, Anastasis said:
Yes. The most invasive of surveillance operations against US citizens need to abide by the policies and procedures that are intended to protect 4th amendment rights.  That is apparently an extreme minority viewpoint on the surly these days.Â
That's why the FISA warrant process is so exhaustive.
-
Johnny Sack thinks they're doing a great job.
-
2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:
I’ll eat my crow when the report drops and says it was all by the book. In the meantime, you guys do the same thing y’all did when we had two rounds of McClatchy Prague.
There's the wiggle room.
Good job.
-
3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:
Different shit is in the news every day, and none of it is due to messaging from Pelosi or Democratic leadership. They can't keep anything specific in the headlines for more than a couple days, not even when handed a report summarizing at least eight times the President clearly obstructed justice (and a few more that are a little more legally iffy).
Again, the Republicans pounded the table about Benghazi. They pounded the table about Hillary's emails. And those weren't remotely scandalous. You're acting like the entire public is paying daily attention to all of this shit just like we are when you know that's not the case. if Pelosi wanted to do so, she could take a few examples of Trump's corruption and malevolence and coordinate a simple but brutal messaging campaign that reminded the public every single day of those issues. Twenty-two women have accused him of sexual misconduct, including rape, and the House hasn't held one fucking hearing on it! That's complete and utter political malpractice and there's no justifiable explanation for it.Â
Stop voting for Democrats who support leadership.
-
Just now, Captainant said:
Oh, so it's not a requirement, they're just abdicating the oaths they swore? Gee, that's SOOOO much better. I bet that'll bring in tons of donations, which is really what it's all about right?
Yes. Politics is about winning elections. That requires money. Lots of it.Â
Â
-
2 minutes ago, Captainant said:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
So just to be clear, you disagree that they swore an oath to support and defend the constitution? And that trump's actions do not represent repeated and intentional attacks against the constitution? For a specific example, his suggestions to postpone the census because he couldn't get his question on it? Which is explicitly required in the constitution?
I don't disagree. That doesn't mean they are required to impeach the president. It means they open themselves up to political attack for not doing so.
Â
-
1 minute ago, Captainant said:
So it's not an abdication of their oath of office to uphold the constitution by not impeaching a president that's trampling over the constitution? Man, your time in washington REALLY fucked your brain up.
There is nothing in the Constitution that requires Congress to impeach the president.
-
Just now, Captainant said:
So your argument is that because the house cannot hold trump to account on its own, it should abdicate its responsibilities all together and focus on fundraising?
I think they should impeach him, but I don't believe they have a responsibility to do so.
-
14 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Sums it rather nicely here:
Â
This is just wrong. It's in the news every single day.
Â
-
1 hour ago, Captainant said:
And what I'm saying is, maybe her job should be acting like a co-equal branch of government and driving accountability. Ya know, rather than
selling out to corporate interests being a fundraising specialist. Because fundraising doesn't fix our broken system, and it arguably perpetuates and worsens the problem.The House of Representatives does not have the power to hold Donald Trump accountable in a manner worthy of his malfeasance.
Thanks a lot, Madison.
-
Just now, Captainant said:
And she'll get chosen again because she's great at sucking up those sweet lobbying bucks and distributing it to her caucus. Money is what makes washington work, and nancy keeps the trough full. Nancy doesn't garner support by pushing policies that her caucus is interested in and supports. She does it by changing ballot rules to make dissenting voices be named and shamed. She prefers a stick to a carrot, and it's going to lead to the democratic party being a fucking dumpster fire just like it has been since 2012. BECAUSE SHE WAS FUCKING RUNNING IT THEN TOO!
Yep. She's really, really, really good at her job.
-
1 minute ago, Fozzz said:
This is silly and extremely reductive.Â
Just like capitalism.
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Bad news for Flynn.
Â
Someone wants a pardon.
-
2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
I don’t need to talk to Pelosi to know my views are being heard.  She is taking shit from all directions.  Just read the replies to any of her recent tweets.  The only people protecting her are republicans/centrists that thinks she has some master plan.Â
Even if she does have some master plan (she doesn’t), her moves thus far indicate that plan sucks.Â
She's being protected by the caucus that voted her Speaker of the House.
She'll get chosen again if they hold the House.
For or against reparations?
in Cloak Room
Posted
Yep. Housing discrimination and racism has done wonders for white real property values.