Here's the thing...
Tech would love to schedule these teams in OOC, but they can't get any buyers (I would bet BYU and others would say the same thing). So if BIG and SEC refuse to schedule the other P2 schools, then how can they then say the other P2 schools should be excluded because they "don't play anybody"? If BIG & SEC are so confident that they are so much superior top to bottom than Big12 and ACC, why won't they schedule them with reciprocal home games? Oregon at least did with Tech, so I'll give UO credit for stepping up to the plate when most in their conference and SEC won't.
What really pisses me off is the 8 game conference schedule in the SEC to boot. Yes, I now that changes next year (thankfully), but this year SEC teams played 8 conference games to everyone else playing 9. So it's a damn racket. (1) Criticize B12 and ACC for not having as strong a schedule, but (2) won't schedule B12 and ACC, (3) only playing 8 conference games to everyone else playing 9, and then (4) demand more teams in the CFP because SEC is obviously superior to everyone else.
Forgive me if I refuse to concede that SEC is just that much better of a conference. It's more of a self-fulfilling prophesy conference.