
jkates
-
Posts
428 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by jkates
-
-
Good grief. Shooter's gonna go to jail for a long time. Deceased was clearly a moron but wasn't actively threatening anyone with a level of violence that needed to be responded to with gunfire.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Aqua Buddha said:
I’d like to hear why they’re different than George Zimmerman.
Zimmerman had a legitimate self-defense claim under FL law. These guys did not, as per the video evidence, under GA law.
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, Dr. Teeth said:
There goes Tucker's guest list next week.
What has Tucker said about this trial?
-
7 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:
They weren't even charged until the video came out. Three different DA's passed on the case.
Yup. I was simply referring to the trial. Once I saw the evidence and heard the prosecution and defense, I figured it was a slam dunk guilty. The quick deliberation seems to agree.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:
The fact that we’re even the least bit surprised is sad.
Many of us are not surprised. It was the appropriate verdict despite the defense's attempts at legal loopholes. Those dudes unnecessarily chased a kid down and murdered him....on video. Without the video, this could easily go another way. Much like the Rittenhouse trial, if one watched it and saw the videos, one would not be shocked at the verdicts.
-
5
-
2
-
-
Justice seems to have been correctly served here given the facts of this case. Good work.
-
3
-
-
9 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
Don’t worry. They’ll walk too.I hold the opposite opinion. There are key differences in the cases. The video in the McMichael case helps the prosecution. The defendants are pieces of crap.
-
4
-
-
VERLANDER!!!
LET'S GOOOO!!!
-
1
-
-
What is the judge blathering on about? Get to the good stuff!
-
Have any of the legal experts opined on how long the jury might deliberate? Are they expecting a verdict today? Tomorrow? Next week?
-
11 minutes ago, Brothahorn said:1 hour ago, Satoshi said:So is this going to be done today? I wonder what the nomad Twitter expert class will move to next.
Ahmaud A, case. Which is actually the one worth paying attention to.
Indeed. Also, strange that the media calls is the Ahmaud Arbery trial. It should be called the McMichael trial.
-
They pull one picture from a video and you find that definitive?
Some of us watched a lot of the trial, son.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
Well that’s not what you said. You said the kid who just now died lost the parent lottery, that his parents suck, and that you were “all for” pressIng charges against the parents. It’s not like I can’t read or anyone else can’t scroll up to read what you wrote if they feel like it. Hence me calling you a piece of shit, which is true. You should admit you’re wrong and move on.
I’m not sorry that my post hurt your feelings and sent you straight to ad hominem. We’ll get past it. Well, I will.
I said I was all for it, but that’s only if a charge fits. I didn’t say that we should go lock them up no matter what. You should scroll up and read some more, but I hope you don’t.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
6 minutes ago, VivaNaranja said:
A 6 year old girl died in the Aurora movie theater shooting. Should we charge her paralyzed mother for bringing her daughter to an R rated movie?
We would were I emperor. But alas...
-
4 minutes ago, VivaNaranja said:
So his parents should be charged even though they didn't violate the law? They made a poor decision - one that I wouldn't make. They didn't commit a crime and its cruel and asinine to say they should be charged with a crime after losing their child in a tragic accident.
A 6 year old girl died in the Aurora movie theater shooting. Should we charge her paralyzed mother for bringing her daughter to an R rated movie?
My "pressing charges against them" is how I feel. I do not want anyone to be charged if no laws were broken.
-
1 hour ago, JimmyJames said:
Doubling down eh troll? So you’re a “proud of it” piece of shit.
Why would I try to convince a proud of it piece of shit troll who blames the death of a nine year old on his parents for attending a concert with gasp, vulgar language. Seems like a waste of time to me.
Noted. I'll mark this in the win column for me.
-
46 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:
You should get on the news and air that bullshit opinion on camera for all to see. Or file a citizens complaint with the cops.
Or you could try to stop being such a complete piece of shit.
Ha. I should try to get on the news with this commonly held belief? What a stupid opinion and emotionally-challenged response. I should file a complaint with the cops? Why? Did they violate the law? Last I checked, it is not illegal to have a different moral code than me. Either way, the cops are already involved and don't need a keyboard Karen "helping" them out.
We disagree here though I'm not sure why. Do you think the kid's parents are to be praised for taking him to this concert? Do think the dad made a great decision to take his 9 year old to a lineup that included Young Thug, SZA, Lil Baby, Drake, Travis Scott, etc.? Do you think a 9 year old should be exposed to those lyrics and the crowd that comes along with them? Do tell. Or don't.
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, JimmyJames said:
Fuck off.
No thanks. That kid's parents suck. I'm all for pressing charges against them. Taking a 9 year old to that show? Gross.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Damn! Poor little guy.
He lost the parent lottery.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk-
1
-
-
All I have ever really tried to do here is push back on the narrative that this is some sort of slam dunk case y’all espouse for the defense. It’s not.
Get real.
That's not all you've tried to do.
Yes, the case is a slam dunk self-defense. I didn’t know this until I watched the trial. It's clear.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Moby Ric said:
Holy shit Rittenhouse is on the stand.
Did not see that coming.
-
Just now, Carl Spackler said:
rSo was the evidence that Rosenbaum attempted to grab Rittenhouse's firearm? Something else/more than that?
I guess I'm struggling with the notion that it would be self-defense for Rittenhouse to shoot Rosenbaum simply because the latter attempted to grab Rittenhouse's gun. But if Rosenbaum was doing something more than that which caused Rittenhouse to reasonably be in fear for his life, then perhaps it was self-defense. I'm at a disadvantage because I haven't been watching the trial and I'm not sure of the testimony that has been elicited about that particular part of the incident.
Rosenbaum was chasing Rittenhouse, lunged for his gun while yelling, "Fuck you", etc. Several testified that Rittenhouse shot him in self-defense, not just cuz.
-
5 hours ago, Pancho said:
Heartbreaking
Indeed. Also idiotic. Taking a 9 year old to Astroworld Fest?
-
Clear cut self-defense.
-
7
-
Juicy Smalls Trial Started This Week
in Cloak Room
Posted
VERDICT REACHED