Jump to content

Kwix

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kwix

  1. If only there was already a dedicated thread for talking about that stupid map.
  2. Seeing that stoops, heupel and kiffin all make 9, I'd be surprised if sark isn't above that next year.
  3. Yeah, cause a tiebreaker never screwed us back then.
  4. This it correct. Once the 3 way bumps to the 2 way, those 2 teams are both in. Done.
  5. I'm going to start reading all his posts in Stephen A Smith voice.
  6. If you read this whole paragraph together: "In the event of a tie between more than two teams, the following procedures will be used. After one team has an advantage and is “seeded”, all remaining teams in the multiple-team tiebreaker will repeat the multiple-team tie-breaking procedure. If at any point the multiple-team tie is reduced to two teams, the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied." The logical interpretation is: If 1 team has an advantage, they are in and then start over. If 2 teams have an advantage, they are both in.
  7. I really don't think the line "If at any point the multiple-team tie is reduced to two teams, the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied." means pick a #1 seed then start over. The 2 team tiebreakers clearly states "If two teams are tied for first place both teams will participate in the championship game"
  8. Ok, I know the conference is saying we haven't clinched but they can't read their own fucking rules. So in a 3 way tie with Texas, OU, and OSU Multiple team tiebreaker rules: Step 1: get skipped because we did not all play each other. Step 2: Record against the next highest placed common opponent in the standings. (This is ISU, which Texas and OU beat, and OSU lost) At this point, you read the intro to the multiple team tiebreaker rules: "If at any point the multiple-team tie is reduced to two teams, the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied." Then you look at the first line of the 2 team tiebreaker rules: "If two teams are tied for first place both teams will participate in the championship game and the winner of the head-to-head will be the #1 seed." Seams pretty clear that OU and Texas go in this scenario.
  9. Not enough love being given for the pitch on this play
  10. I'm not seeing how OU gets the #1 seed in this scenario. Step 1 doesn't apply because Texas didn't play OSU. Step 2 doesn't apply because no common opponent comparison puts 1 team ahead of the other 2. Step 3 puts Texas in. People seem to be making up some combination of step 2 and head to head out of thin air.
  11. Negged for posting a ketch tweet, but yeah pretty fucking great.
  12. Ok, but if that's the case, wouldn't we fall to rule 3. Win percentage against all common conference opponents (must be common among all teams involved in the tie). As rule2 doesn't provide a clear #1 seed.
  13. 3 way tie with Texas, OU, OSU: common opponents ISU [3 losses] (OSU lost to ISU) Kansas [4-5 losses] (OU lost to KU) BYU [7 losses] (all 3 beat BYU) against common opponents with 3 losses (ISU) Texas (1-0), OU (1-0), OSU (0-1) The rules get a bit murky here i) Texas and OU are in OSU is out, and then OU is #1 seed via head to head against Texas. ii) OSU is out, then OU gets #1 seed via head to head against Texas. Then tiebreaker starts over. OSU is #2 seed via record against common opponent OU.
  14. Wait. Are you saying your wife will carry a bag of trash from the kitchen out to the garage. Nice fucking humble-brag.
×
×
  • Create New...