Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1760
  • Joined

Reputation

2385 Surly 10%

About scottsins

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. To be fair, the CBS thing was but different. It wasn’t that he said Trump raped someone. He said that Trump was “convicted of rape”, when those actual counts were acquittals. It’s not much of a difference but the verbiage used made it a specific statement made that was not true. That said, a retraction should have been enough and settling wasn’t necessarily the only option since, IMO, the malice requirement and damages issues were still ripe for a fight.
  2. Joe Burrow catching strays? Wtf?
  3. I can think of two for sure without trying.
  4. Just browse the headlines of all of the other articles on that site. It’s like gatewaypundit, but at a lower reading level.
  5. He ran for two TD’s last week and I’m not sure that it made much difference.
  6. “Make-a-wish kid dying of throwing shoulder cancer.”, for some reason has me LOL’ing HARD early on a Sunday.
  7. I’m not totally caught up in this thread, but did you ever reply to the 5+ specific queries about the statement by POTUS on F&F?
  8. I’m saying that if he did suck dicks, it was because he gave drugs/$ to the owners of said dicks. NOT, as is often stated that he sucked dicks in order to receive drugs.
  9. That’s a common misconception on this board. The actual story was that he picked up men at “flophouses” and used $/drugs to get them to “party” with him. Said partying was stated to include meth and sex.
  10. Such bullshit. Why was this “source’s” inability to recall the nature of their relationship, which is the basis for the retraction, NOT KNOWN when they first published the article?
  11. I explained it yesterday in reply to your post. It means that the government can not restrict speech (with some exceptions). Kirk’s 1st Amendment rights were not infringed this week.
  12. My issue with the Guardian article is that it’s contradicted by the family’s comments that the shooter was not at all “political” until after he came back from college.
×
×
  • Create New...