Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1658
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. This. FYI, I just talked to a Tech grad prosecutor yesterday. She is a family violence specialist at the misdemeanor and felony level. She’s one of those “crusader” prosecutors that is extremely difficult to deal with on these type of cases. Very biased towards believing and empathizing with accusers. Anyway, she was telling me how she has serious doubts about thy affidavit and is not a case that she would at all want to do be dealing with. Lots of holes, weaknesses, etc.
  2. Not trolling, but I’m behind on this thread. Which Beard comments are you referring to that corroborate her claims?
  3. Her statement to the police /= “the reports”. Well, I guess they kinda are, since the reports merely reflect what she said happened.
  4. He wouldn’t neg you for that. I mean, that’s criminal defense lawyer’s job.
  5. Also, regarding immamac’s prior “WHY NOT DONE!?!?” posts: To be REALLY FUCKING CLEAR…take it to the bank that Minton’s firm literally did everything they could as fast as possible as good as possible. And by possible, I don’t mean for them, but for anyone. Prior to starting my current gig at a defense firm, those guys were my go to referral for anything in Travis County if I couldn’t take it for some reason. One of them used to lurk/post around here, I think.
  6. Also, bite marks are predominantly caused by someone defending themselves.
  7. Exactly what would you expect his lawyer to have done on scene, other than to just stop Beard from making a couple of comments to the cops? Do we know if he incriminated himself? Otherwise a lawyer on the scene isn’t going to talk the cops out of arresting/charging him. That’s not how it works.
  8. Or if she bit her own arm after she called the cops.
  9. Wut? The ball went out of bounds, didn’t it? There’s an official on the LOS. Did it cross the plane of the sideline to that guy’s right or left?
  10. I’m smoking a deboned breast this year. I think I want to try dry brining. For a whole Turkey, 12-24 hours is recommended by Serious Eats. Can I lop off a decent chunk of time since I’m just doing a breast or nah? * Or, can I get away with no brining at all? I did this a couple of years ago and did a wet brine for about 20 hours and the finished product had a god awful texture. Do not want.
  11. Yep. More importantly, to me, they need to raid Fetterman’s entire social media team and strategists.
  12. Yep. Staunch pro-lifers, if not relying on religious or moral grounds, seem to never get that: “Human life” /= “A human”
  13. These nuns had some dirty habits.
  14. This is peak Lobo and I AM HERE FOR IT.
  15. OP’s premise is flawed. How “cheap” do you think we could get him for? Hint: he would get paid record/near record sums of money just like the last two hires did
  16. We saw her and when she walked around, there was some sort of shock wave from her boots hitting the pavement that just did remarkable things.
  17. I think you underestimate the notion of people voting AGAINST candidates, rather than for their opponents. Catholics, IMO will still vote for Walker because they oppose Warnock. Keeping the Dems from taking the Senate is their goal.
  18. Serious eats has a good sauce recipe in their NY pizza recipe. For Neapolitan, just go by really good quality canned whole tomatoes and blend. Do not cook.
  19. I agree with you, but his picture was during the game. My question is “what would the Fucking call be anyway?” Too many people on the sidelines? I don’t think that’s a thing.
  20. Regarding the “program related” theory…or “it’s systemic”…or “it’s the program’s culture”, can anyone actually articulate with specificity what this means? I’ve never had anyone lay out exactly what is causing the losses, if it’s not the coaches/players? I mean, I GUESS I get that you can fault an AD for making a bad hire, but is that it?
  21. Probably just trying to cope with being groomed into gun hating transgender socialists by their teachers.
  22. Yeah. I probably posted this already upthread but, We would be blocking downfield on a dump screen or whatever. No flag… Official would then get on the microphone to make a courtesy announcement. “There is no OPI because the pass was complete behind the LOS.” (Pause) Ref turns mic back on, “the previous play is under review”. “After review, the pass was completed beyond the LOS, so there is a penalty for OPI, which will now be enforced.” It was bananas because the call after the review does not happen if the ref doesn’t just take the initiative to get on the mic to tell us why they did not throw a flag. Weirdest shit ever.
  23. Nvm. That “analysis” comes from this guy: /no CR
  24. Does having the ball = “in the process of throwing a pass”? I find that interpretation suspect AF.
×
×
  • Create New...