Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1,553
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. Josh Marshall should get a clue. There is a separate IG probe into these acts by agents in the NYC field office. They haven’t “failed to look at it.”
  2. The kid in a cage is actually at Dallas City Hall. However, the main thing I took away was just the sad sick comments posted next to the photo.
  3. Here’s the thing: You are ignoring the fact that opening up economic opportunities and globalizing to a degree, to Kim, poses a giant risk of being removed from power. So the “top guy in a prosperous country” may not be accurate or seen that way by Kim. ETA: What is Kim’s current lifestyle? I mean, he doesn’t SEEM broke at all to me. I keep reading about his relative “squalor” as a motivator, but doesn’t he have about anything he wants at any time? ETAA: His net worth is estimated at $7-10 BILLION. I don’t see the same motivation in him as others, I guess.
  4. I’ve personally been party to such conversations more times than I can count.
  5. So this is NOT the “alt left thread of mockery”?
  6. Actually, I imagine that we will agree to withdraw troops from SK, in order to insure that Kim will do us the honor of visiting the WH.
  7. I wonder how many Big Macs it would take for Trump to allow Kim to pose for photos sitting at the desk in the Oval Office.
  8. So...this is NOT the “alt left thread of mockery”?
  9. If only those were the only two options...
  10. LOL if THIS is the catalyst for contempt of Congress action... There have been 30 more blatant and more relevant acts on contempt by witnesses to date.
  11. I love how the basic grammatical error occurs literally FOUR words after the insulting phrase “Low I.Q.”
  12. Right. And in Asia, they call it “stringing you ARONG”.
  13. I hope he doesn’t think about what happened that day over Macho Grande.
  14. So like, in the “stoped” tweet, am I correct in reading that as a claim of victory even if no change from the status quo results?
  15. Uh oh. I haz some personal concerns now.
  16. Sure. From the Trade War thread: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-trump-effect-solar-insight/billions-in-u-s-solar-projects-shelved-after-trump-panel-tariff-idUSKCN1J30CT
  17. I'm hoping this, or something similar happens, so that I can witness the mental gymnastics of Drumpf and his die-hard supporters engage in, in order to explain it was the "best deal ever".
  18. They think that “subsidies” = free money given to poors. $$$$$ going to US companies and industries = MAGA.
  19. The “one generality you get” isn’t even correct.
  20. What is the purpose of the term “typical democrat politician”. Assuming each word has a purpose, I would assume that you assign some uniqueness regarding who uses the “children nonsense”? LOL.
  21. “A sufficient number”. OK. So you are NOT claiming that most Trump voters did so for your stated reading then? That’s the assertion that you originally made which I was responding to.
  22. Link to establish the “fed up enough to vote...” rationale as the sole, oreven primary reason for Trump voters? That’s a general and generous attribution you are making there.
  23. Homesexuality Adultery Murder Those are analogous to you? Someone is just biologically born a murderer or adulterer?
  24. I wasn’t reading carefully. I thought the example was a “regular” cabinet/agency position.
×
×
  • Create New...