Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1651
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. Yeah, except that all of the investigations that are ended upon resignation still have records and those records should be available under Open Records requests. Also, in the vast majority of files, these jackasses have been written up or reprimanded for all kinds of bad shit before the really bad thing that gets them forced out. The problem isn’t even this complicated most of the time. Gatesville PD hired a cop last year who was fired less than two years prior from Killeen. Fired for misleading his supervisor to establish probable cause and get authorization for a strip search. It’s plain as fucking day right HERE IN HIS FILE THAT I’M STARING AT WHILE I TYPE THIS. For extra LOL’s, a year before being fired he was all over local media for an excessive force incident (that he was demoted as a result of). Not enough people give a fuck. They never really looked into his history. Of course, they are aware now, since I sent the records to a friend of mine one who was prepping a trial involving the officer. And yes, the officer is still on the Gatesville PD payroll somehow.
  2. Also even if you do not intend to kill anyone, you can still be prosecuted for murder, under the felony murder doctrine. Specifically, the deadly conduct by discharge of firearm felony would be used to actually make a murder charge under those facts.
  3. Agreed. Just say, “the local PD was tasked with just making sure no one got on the roof and they didn’t do that.”
  4. Maybe not right leaning posters, but there are a lot of DixonHur’s friends who will be voting for Harris now that we’re sitting out before.
  5. Dan Patrick thanks you for your financial support.
  6. Let me clarify. I’m not saying that the premise is wrong, but personally, I’m not going down that rabbit hole until people go on the record, not anonymously to attribute specific statements and beliefs to Pelosi, etc.
  7. I think most of your premise lacks credible sourcing.
  8. It’s just confusing because your friends HATE Trump, but will willingly help out him back in the WH. Assuming they aren’t dim AF, they understand what a disaster that proposition is for us and future generations. Like a 6-3 or 7-2 SCOTUS packed with Justices like Alito and Thomas are currently, but just don’t care? But they DO care enough if it’s Kamala Harris on the ballot? I would vote for Stoops/Switzer over Trump if they were Dems.
  9. Why do you hang out with so many dipshits?
  10. Who gives a shit. That report is fake and honestly, needs to be nuked from this thread.
  11. An automatic rifle would have resulted in a much different outcome, casualty/fatality wise. Guess a gun law actually did some good in this scenario…not that anyone on Trump’s “side” will admit it though.
  12. But the quote in that article did not actually say that was the rule.
  13. Her quote doesn’t actually say what her assertion about it does, but whatever.
  14. It will continue to run as long as a bunch of people are actually willing to believe that SS protocol would be to let a would-be assassin get a round off before neutralizing him.
  15. You just did that thing again that you keep doing on this thread.
  16. Yes. Because the bloody fist pump isn’t some next level gladiator shit.
  17. Casualty /= fatality
  18. I was just stating that if Barrett’s concurrence did not include certain holdings of the majority, then future cases would be decided the same way on that particular issue, meaning 5-4 with Barrett agreeing with the three dissenters here.
  19. Assuming Barrett doesn’t change her mind in the post sod contention she expresses with the majority, that “stuff” wouldn’t play going forward, right?
  20. So…we are just going to ignore the whole concept of previous Trump voters who will NOT come out for him now (new shit has come to light)? Also, I’m a previous Biden voter who now thinks neither of them should be POTUS. And I’ll pull the lever for Joe AGAINST TRUMP in November. I just wonder how many past Biden voters do NOT hate Trump with a burning passion, basically just ambivalent to the extent that they just don’t vote at all? Who are those people, and how many of them are there?
  21. My biggest point of concern is that Biden/DNC agreed to this debate with terms that included a prohibition of any contemporaneous fact checking by moderators. Why agree to that? If Trump refuses to participate…WIN because there’s no chance of looking bad AND the talking point is that Trump wouldn’t agree to tell the truth. If Trump does agree, at least there’s a little help when Dotard does Dotard things.
  22. Propose a new rule to fix this problem and we can discuss it. I would presume that it would essentially include a limit on the number of pretrial issues that can be raised by a defendant in any case where said defendant is a potential candidate in an upcoming election?
  23. Maybe there is a comparison to draw between the two executive actions, when speaking generally to the use of executive orders as opposed to legislative solutions. Like I said, I was and am FOR DACA, so not sure where the “gripe is”.
×
×
  • Create New...