Jump to content
Jordan Washington chats with Bobby for Burnt Ends ×

BHMCruiser

Legacy Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1682

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BHMCruiser

  1. BHMCruiser
    My bad. I thought I had and now I cannot edit it.
  2. BHMCruiser
    I'd also like to point out something I just realized the other day (like 7 years later or whatever): Woody Harrelson tells Matthew McConaughey you don't mow another man's lawn: Well.....
  3. BHMCruiser
  4. BHMCruiser
    How about "meh"
  5. BHMCruiser
    If by "same results" you mean "miss wildly at 3 yards" or "blow up in my hand" then yes.
  6. BHMCruiser
    Obviously I'm the minority opinion here, but that's exactly what I felt about the first episode of We Own This City. I felt like Simon had lost it. I was utterly uncompelled by any aspect of the show. It compares poorly to The Wire.
  7. BHMCruiser
    How about "no, it does not get better."
  8. BHMCruiser
    I loved the Wire. I thought the first episode of We Own This City was objectively terrible.
  9. BHMCruiser
    I just finished the first episode. I thought it was terrible. Does it get better?
  10. BHMCruiser
    I lived in Baltimore for 7 years and consider The Wire to be a VERY optimistic take on Baltimore. At least it was written by somebody who clearly loves Baltimore notwithstanding how completely fucked up it is.
  11. BHMCruiser
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/12/03/snake-infested-house-fire/
  12. BHMCruiser
    Agreed
  13. BHMCruiser
    Okay
  14. BHMCruiser
    save it for the rubes
  15. BHMCruiser
    Oh come on. You don't really think I am unaware that the right had been recognized for some period of time? Give me a break. All I am saying is what SCOTUS will be holding: that there never was a constitutional right to abortion. It's no different than the concept of an unconstitutional law being void ab initio.
  16. BHMCruiser
    you know that's not true for all the reasons you've already stated in terms of women being chattel, lack of autonomy, etc. You're making a natural rights argument that is different than what the constitution protects. And for what it's worth I agree with you on the policy.
  17. BHMCruiser
    it's been done But no question Heller is up for the Roe treatment once the composition of the Court flips
  18. BHMCruiser
    I have no desire whatsoever to insult you or your intelligence.
  19. BHMCruiser
    I'm saying that the people who ratified the constitution, the bill of rights, and the fourteenth amendment were not contemplating abortion when they did so and certainly did not intend to protect that right by doing so
  20. BHMCruiser
    lol and what method of constitutional interpretation is not results driven? Parts of it are accurate, which is why I said it was an oversimplification and not incorrect. It's correct in the sense that rights evolve in terms of how they are expressed (for example, we don't use printing presses, buggies, or muskets anymore), but that does not mean that we can just create new rights because it's good public policy.
  21. BHMCruiser
    I get what you're saying but that position currently has 3.5 votes at SCOTUS
  22. BHMCruiser
    yeah that's not what they're holding. They are holding that there is not and never has been a constitutional right to an abortion because it's not protected by the constitution because it is neither an enumerated right protected by the constitution nor is it one of the unenumerated rights that existed at the time of ratification. I'm not going to try and insult you but that's what the holding is/will be.
  23. BHMCruiser
    an intentional oversimplification of textualism/originalism and how it works but you know that
  24. BHMCruiser
    sure you are. You're saying there was a constitutional right to an abortion because Roe recognized such a right even though SCOTUS is now saying that Roe was wrongly decided because there never was a constitutional right to an abortion. Maybe we're just arguing semantics but the result is the same: SCOTUS is going to hold that there is no constitutional right to an abortion.
  25. BHMCruiser
    begging the question overload SCOTUS is holding that Roe was wrongly decided and that there is not and never has been a right to an abortion

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...