I like this one:
https://www.grainger.com/product/45NU52?ef_id=Cj0KCQjwt-6LBhDlARIsAIPRQcIPh8hJCSr2149aWeY0Dy-2z0VVjYMdBlurPfB6vcsZHu1G5oVS2rwaAh7sEALw_wcB:G:s&s_kwcid=AL!2966!3!496359976444!!!g!472964099515!&gucid=N:N:PS:Paid:GGL:CSM-2295:4P7A1P:20501231&gclid=Cj0KCQjwt-6LBhDlARIsAIPRQcIPh8hJCSr2149aWeY0Dy-2z0VVjYMdBlurPfB6vcsZHu1G5oVS2rwaAh7sEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
You changed your quote. The distinction between violence and verbal abuse is not semantics. It is the bright line we draw in our society and for good reason. That does not mean verbal abuse is okay. It just means it is not violence. Hurting your feelings is not the same thing as breaking your orbital socket. It just isn't.
Verbal abuse is not "violence." Violence is violence. They are completely different things. They are FUNDAMENTALLY different things. The distinction between them is that they are different things. Conflating the two is not just a slippery slope - it's a cliff, and you jumped off of it.
It would be sexual assault. You did not consent to that because you did not have all the information you would need to formulate consent. Some free advice though is that your reaction should be to be extremely nice, to say "I'm not interested" and to make sure they get home safely. Anything else and you've got a potential issue.
^^^^^^ this right here is why I cannot support you as much as maybe we'd both like. There's no such thing as "verbally violent." I reject the concept on an existential level, and I would advise you to reconsider using this paradigm at all because all it says to people is "I don't want to have a disagreement because I can't win on the merits."
I would compare it to a 1911 and a Walther PPK/S. They are not as practical for every day carry as many modern firearms, but there's a gravitas to them that makes them very appealing. Like wearing a Rolex instead of a Timex.
Omni Parker House claims to have invented the Boston Cream pie. I stayed there a few years ago for work and my colleague (who'd never been to Boston before) literally ate like four of them a day. It was utterly preposterous. Neat old hotel, too, but showing its age and the rooms are expensive and small. But the bar is cool.
I don't think that's really his frustration. I think he is more frustrated that he can tell jokes about everything but everybody acts like he killed a baby when he makes trans jokes. The focus of the special is not "look at that movement why do blacks still have it so bad?", it's "I'm not the one punching down at you. I'm just one guy. Society is punching down at me for expressing my opinion. Give me even footing."
I really think it's that simple. The rest is just jokes.