-
Posts
517 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Everything posted by PencilPusher
-
Yes, if the Buddha's name was Sun Tzu......
-
I wouldn't say you are trash, but this year you are Maryland with better offensive talent & coaching. While the analysis above was somewhat simplistic, I do think OSU has shown the ability to hit big plays all year (you are 5th in big play rate in the country....Texas by comparison is ranked 107th) and our defense has shown a propensity to give them up. If you were to look at the scoring drives against us this year, they almost all have 1 or 2 20+ yard plays on the drive. No one is going 10 plays and 70+ yards against our defense much at all this year (which is a contrast to what our offense is doing to most defenses). Mentioned that penalties and turnovers were a big governor in your offense and if they pop up, you won't get to 30. If OSU executes at an average level on offense and hits 8-10 20+ yard plays, I don't see why they don't get to 30 on our defense. By the way, OSU is averaging a 20+ yard play every 8-9 snaps this year, so getting 8-10 may not be a stretch. It sounds like your issue is consistency and that is the one area I think Texas has done a significantly better job then OSU this year is execution, particularly on offense. If Texas rolls, it will be because we limit the big play coupled with continued excellence in offensive execution (limiting turnovers, high 3rd down conversion rate, few sacks allowed). Lets see what happens. I still forsee a 35-31 type game. S&P has us losing by a touchdown. Vegas sees us by a FG. Should be interesting.
-
So as to the upcoming game, the key to this week is "explosives". OSU's path to victory is hit a bunch of big plays. Their offense is Top 10 in generating explosive plays this year....our defense has struggled preventing them. So get out your Greg Davis explosives counter and track both sides. If there is a significant difference in explosive plays in favor of OSU, they will win....it is probably that simple. Worth mentioning again that the only 2 teams that have scored more than 21 points against Texas are also in the Top 10 in explosiveness this year. I'd expect Gundy and Co to throw the kitchen sink at Texas in the first quarter-trickeration, misdirection, etc. to get some quick points. They'll look to try to jump Texas the way Maryland did. If OSU is in the 20's in terms of points by halftime, they should be feeling good. OSU will not be able to generate long sustained drives against this defense given Texas' propensity to stop those kinds of drives plus OSU's penalty and turnover issues this year. They are also below average on 3rd and long and have given up lots of sacks and pressure. This is a team that needs to hit big plays and get good field position. Don't be surprised if OSU hits 30 or more this game. The matchups favor that unless turnovers play a big factor. And they could because OSU is -3 for the year and Cornelius has already tossed 8 INT's. On offense, Texas will have to be somewhat different out of necessity this game. Even if Ehlinger starts (which we may not know until gametime), he will likely be on a pitch count in terms of QB runs and Texas will probably only use that in key situations (short yardage, goaline, etc.). That means Texas has to change how it sets up the run. Unfortunately, not sure there is any Sam Wyche 2 back offense (think Ickey Woods/James Brooks for the old timers out there) in the playbook so generating run opportunities will be tougher as was seen in the Baylor game with Shane. The QB's should be drilled this week on counting the box and if it is a running play into a stacked box, check to a WR screen and vice versa. Texas had success with that against BU late and think it should be a key component of the "run game" this week. OSU's run defense is average, but can't give them easy looks to defend (i.e run into an 8 man box). Alabama can do that-Texas can't(this year anyway). Gotta hope the downfield passing game is crisper this week now that Shane has had some reps with the ones. Can't afford to miss opportunities that should be available. OSU's defense has been generating sacks this year...it appears to be about the only thing the defense does well which is why 3rd and 10 isn't a winning play for Texas this week, despite the fact that Texas is actually in the Top quartile of 3rd and long conversion percentage this year. Texas needs to go into this game thinking 35 points + is what it will take to win. Special teams has a tilt to OSU on the strength of their kicking game. Their kicker is a proven junior who has only missed one attempt this year. Texas' kicker is an emerging freshman that has already missed 5 attempts. Their punting has also been better- Zach Sinor is a veteran who has been netting almost 5 yards more per punt than Bujcevski. At least Buj is coming off his best game as a punter and it was the first week that a bad punt did not lead to opponent points. Neither team has a return game to shout about, but Texas has generated a couple of big punt returns this year. Expect a tight game (surprise). I'll buck S&P and say Texas wins (and covers the - 3 spread), but it will be a 4th quarter game. Texas at least knows how to play these types of games this season. Now back to reliving 2015 and determining OSU's place amongst the serfs of the Big 12 who must pay homage to the royalty that is Texas.
-
S&P+ rankings: Overperformance or overcorrection?
PencilPusher replied to satyanash's topic in Football
That is an excellent point. I was trying to get a handle on why the model showed us as underdogs for the next 3 games even though we are probably better than 2 of those teams and even with the third. 3 game losing streak was a bit of hyperbole on my part. I'd probably more strongly correlate us to the 2-1 record, but I don't think it matters much and we will have another week of data on Tech and WVa to look at next week. -
S&P+ rankings: Overperformance or overcorrection?
PencilPusher replied to satyanash's topic in Football
Continuation of my post above about S&P with a look at defense. Here again, Texas’ profile is similar to offense. On efficiency (Success Rate-40, Marginal Efficiency-21), we are close to or clearly in the top quartile. Explosiveness however (IsoPPP – 91; Marginal Explosivness-97), we are near the bottom quartile. Basically, we are a bitch to sustain drives against consistently but are susceptible to the big play. Again, anyone who has watched Texas this year would agree with that. So, explosive offenses would be our achilles heel. Texas has only given up more than 21 points twice this year. Oklahoma (who is ranked 2nd in both efficiency and explosiveness) and Maryland (who is ranked 5th in explosiveness). Pretty simple to figure out which metric matters against the Texas defense. So lets look at the statistical profile of the next 4 opponents (again, excluding KU at this point OSU – Efficiency (Success Rate – 34, Marginal Efficiency – 28); Explosiveness (IsoPPP – 12; Marginal Explosiveness -11) WVa - Efficiency (Success Rate – 7, Marginal Efficiency – 3); Explosiveness (IsoPPP – 31; Marginal Explosiveness -38) Tech - Efficiency (Success Rate – 23, Marginal Efficiency – 18); Explosiveness (IsoPPP – 81; Marginal Explosiveness -71) ISU - Efficiency (Success Rate – 109, Marginal Efficiency – 106); Explosiveness (IsoPPP – 33; Marginal Explosiveness -74) Ruh-roh…..the next 2 opponents are not good matchups for Texas' defense from the explosives side since they are top quartile. That means expect both to hit the low 30’s which means Texas' offense has to play closer to how they played against OU to win. Now both OSU and WVa struggle with penalties and turnovers which can equalize. The metrics would indicate that Tech may be the easiest to defend as their strength plays to Texas' strength and they are not particularly explosive. ISU’s offense is a mixed bag, but limit their big plays and they can be held in check. So, as has been posited above, explosiveness is really skewing the evaluation when it comes to the Longhorns. So is Texas doomed to lose 3 in a row? Highly doubtful. S&P shows a loss to Tech, but I think that may be the “easiest” win from a statistical profile perspective since Texas' strengths match up well vs their weaknesses. etc. Simply put, the next 2 games will be the toughest to win and you may need to pull out the Greg Davis “explosives” counter because either Texas needs to limit big plays or keep up offensively. If OSU and WVa hit significantly more big plays, Texas is 0-2 in that stretch. 3-2 should be the floor for the remainder of the season. Of course, Tom Herman confounds S&P more than most coaches so perhaps the real floor is 5-0. Lets see how it plays out. -
S&P+ rankings: Overperformance or overcorrection?
PencilPusher replied to satyanash's topic in Football
Well, we are still expected to lose the next 3 under the S&P model though the projected margin of victory has dropped in all of our games and the win probabilities have improved. Guess all of the haters will get their day in the sun if this plays out. While I think the S&P model has its flaws, I am curious as to why we are about to embark on a 3 game losing bender. So lets look at performance through the lens of efficiency and explosiveness vs our remaining opponents. Our offensive efficiency rates (ability to stay on schedule) rank close to the top quartile. (Success rate-43; Marginal Efficiency-34). Explosiveness however is close to the bottom quartile (Iso Points per Play-91, Marginal Explosiveness -97). No surprise to anyone watching our games. We can consistently move the sticks, but do not generate that many "explosives" in the game. Wonder why Herman is so concerned with offensive speed? However, to gauge success against the remaining spate of games, we need to evaluate what other defenses prevent. Our achilles heel would be a team that defensively looks like Texas in that it is hard to sustain drives against, but gives up the big play. Is there a team like that remaining on our schedule? Lets see Ok State - Defense success rate - 46; Marginal Efficiency -57; ISO PPP-83; Marginal Explosiveness-80. Possible problem spot. They are about middle of the road on efficiency and below average on explosives given up. Ok State's big problem is that they are in the bottom quartile of turnover margin, which doesn't help their defense's cause (not to mention penalties-118 in the country on penalty yards ). We will have to play better than against Baylor for sure. West Virginia - Defense success rate - 68; Marginal efficiency - 77; ISO PPP- 52; Marginal Explosiveness - 32. We are not a good matchup for WVa because their defense has shown the ability to allow teams to sustain long drives which suits our gameplan. Couple that with lots of penalty yards (104th) and turnovers, we should be set up for success in this game Tech - Defense success rate - 71; Marginal efficiency - 100; ISO PPP - 114; ISO Explosiveness - 102. A defense that is exactly what we would want to see to have success against. These numbers are actually worse than Baylor's were coming into the game last week. They are also bad at penalties (110th), though favorable at turnovers so far this year. Iowa State - Defense success rate - 35; Marginal efficiency - 65; ISO PPP - 55; Marginal Explosivieness - 36. By metrics, this would be the toughest remaining defense on the schedule which shouldn't surprise anyone who has been paying attention this year. They also rank close to the top quartile in fewest penalties. Best bet for a 21-17 type game down the stretch of the season. I won't bother with Kansas at this point since we are still expected to win that one by double digits. So, there isn't a defense that should completely scare us down the stretch, but it looks like OSU and Iowa State may be the defenses we have the hardest time with. My $ is on Iowa State defending us the best down the stretch. Will look at the inverse (our defense against remaining offenses) later. -
I have been accused of wrong-doing. But these false accusations will not deter us. We WILL annex Poland by the Spring, at any cost! AND… our stock will rise HIGH!
-
S&P+ rankings: Overperformance or overcorrection?
PencilPusher replied to satyanash's topic in Football
Good news for us then....we don't see a team outside the Top 50 until KU at the end of the season. -
S&P+ rankings: Overperformance or overcorrection?
PencilPusher replied to satyanash's topic in Football
Yep.....the SEC quarterbacking group (outside of Tua) as a whole has been much worse than expected. Still think the ags have 3 more losses in them somewhere. -
Let's Get Real on Texas FB (Likes, Concerns, Trends, Can Improve)
PencilPusher replied to LTtxfan's topic in Football
Few comments on some of the above: Not sure why you would get neg for this. He is a good guy. Which means he isn't long for Baylor. Unlike Teaff and CAB, he's not a local guy so the first good opportunity he gets, he gone. Only reason he ended up at Rape U was they could pay more than Temple. Remember he flirted with the Colts last year. How would you explain Jett Duffey then. He is not the prototypical Tech QB and it was quite apparent in the TCU game that they couldn't do the same things they would do with Alan Bowman at QB (just ask a Tech fan). In fact, Coach Bro started McLane Carter in the 2nd half but quickly reverted because that wasn't working either. Tech won that game because TCU couldn't hold onto the ball at critical junctures. It is hard to draw many concrete conclusions from the Baylor game due to Sam's injury. Defensively, we played reasonably well holding them to 17 points, though we had our moments. I do think the Buchele interception gave Baylor life because we were handling them pretty well up to that point. Giving up the TD was bad sudden change defense on our part and that needs to improve. We still can't generate pass rush from just 5 consistently. On the flip side, Baylor only had 2 first half drives of any consistency and the first drive was aided by 9 missed tackles, which screams hangover from the OU game. Special teams was a mixed bag, though it was on Dicker the kicker this time whose 34 yard miss was the big issue. Have to be consistent from 40 in (i.e 95+%) and we aren't there yet. Hitting that one makes the last defensive stand moot. However, it was Buj's best effort of the year and delivered a big punt to push Baylor back inside the 5 to start their last drive, which turned out to be critical. Going forward, if we have to have Shane in place for OSU, strategy changes have to ensue. I liked the WR screen game when Baylor tried to stuff the box in the 4th quarter and we should have worked that more on the final drive and that suits Shane's game better. We also have to drive the ball down the field more. Shane is capable of that, but it was clear his accuracy was off due to lack of reps and it repeatedly stunted drives and caused the one turnover (and almost another). In 2015, we were able to run out of standard sets because of the ability to hit shots down the field. Shane has to be able to make those plays otherwise we will see stacked boxes without a QB run threat. Screen game to the backs needs to be part of it as well. We did have a nice screen set up to Ingram, but the ball was late and off target which allowed the Baylor defender to clean up on the play. I agree on the need to have gotten more reps for Shane before, but we haven't really had any games that have been a laugher in the 4th quarter yet and in addition, I wonder how much the new redshirting rules are affecting these types of decisions. Nevertheless, during this week we need to have Shane getting lots of first team reps even if Sam heals up enough to start the OSU game. Bye week turned out to be timely this year. -
Let's Get Real on Texas FB (Likes, Concerns, Trends, Can Improve)
PencilPusher replied to LTtxfan's topic in Football
Cool idea. Here's Bill Connelly's google docs on S&P if you want a starting spot https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ2e9xV7-ClihFVJ3kla0ZDxzFCQ7-WXvQRur-nK6gOzo333PqSetw52kEGgbXKb6viGZSbYuJugvRR/pubhtml# -
Yep....one of the biggest hypocrites of them all.....sure some of the old timers can probably add some color here.
-
Between this clash of titans and Eagles/Jints there was a lot of shitty football on display last night, other than the Eagles offensive first half and Saquon Barkley. Couple thoughts on this one. Mentioned in an earlier post this week that I thought Tech and ISU wouldn't win the conference but would shape the race. Tech just shaped the race by eliminating TCU. TCU's defense is very good, but Shawn Robinson is horrible as a QB right now. Should be interesting to see if Justin Rogers gets some playing time in the last 3 games. That Qb competition in the spring will be one to watch. I am now more convinced then ever that OU will win out to the WVa game. In the giddiness of the win last week, there seemed to be a bunch of folks thinking that OU might trip up on the road at either TCU or Tech, but nothing last night convinced me of that. OU comes to Ft Worth next week off of a bye. Will it get Oklahoma trailer park woman ugly?
-
Agreed, with the "results" of the NCAA investigation used as the hammer.
-
Let's Get Real on Texas FB (Likes, Concerns, Trends, Can Improve)
PencilPusher replied to LTtxfan's topic in Football
Welcome to college football 2018. There's Alabama and everyone else. I don't think any conference has more than 1 or 2 "very good teams" so the odds of a team facing multiple very good teams this season is low. Go through the conferences to see who the very good teams are. ACC - Clemson and ??????. Clemson has looked OK this season and they've been fortunate they have not faced another similar "very good" team this season while they transition to the Trevor Lawrence era. The rest of the ACC is hammered dogshit. B1G- Ohio State for sure, though their defense is shaky (though not as bad as OU). Penn State is a carbon copy of OSU with worse coaching apparently (elite offense, avg to below average defense) and Michigan has navigated the easy part of their schedule since ND. Is either PSU or Michigan a very good team? Probably, though one might end up with 3+ losses before the season is done which means they were probably just a good team. SEC- Beyond Alabama (who hasn't played anyone yet-their season really starts after Thanksgiving), there is Georgia (who hasn't played a very good team yet) and........Barn? Nope, they've already lost 2. LSU? Better than expected, but if they lose to GA this week, they aren't better than 9-3 this season. SEC has actually been worse than is perceived.....this was a year that QB play was supposed to elevate the league, but has been disappointing beyond Tagavoila. (Say, what happened to that Lock fellow everyone was talking up last December?) Maybe the SEC needs to import more Hawaiians/Polynesians. Pac 12 After Dark - Probably should have most of their games after dark since the only difference between the Pac 12 and ACC this year is the ACC has Clemson. Washington may be the best of a sad bunch but no very good teams here. I think TX is a Top 15 team, but probably not a Top 5 team, even if we were to magically win out and get to the playoff somehow. We aren't elite at anything, but instead have relied on developed talent executing at a reasonably high level to succeed this season. I say reasonably because we do have Maryland, Tulsa, and K State data points to suggest that we haven't been at a high level all season. But against USC, TCU, and OU we have played at times at an elite level, though not for 4 quarters. Assuming we win this week, I think 9 wins becomes the floor (absent a rash of injuries). Sam may not be VY or Colt, but he's playing at a high enough level (coupled with an improved o-line) to get us to competing for the conference championship this year, which was a big goal this year and the right trend marker. -
I hadn't heard that. If so, is that pending the NCAA investigation?
-
Hey, you're not talking that Michigan deposit bottle scam again, are you?
-
I read the article and the comments (love the one baylor/ag/sooner troll's quixotic quest to try to defend Baylor and throw shade at Texas at the same time. The spirit of #CAB lives!). Quite frankly, I think there is a better solution to evicting Baylor, especially in light of the fact that in about 5 years the realignment wheel may spin college football in a completely different direction. Rather than evict them, take their money. If the NCAA comes back with anything from their "investigation", use it as pretense to cut their distribution of Tier 1 and 2 revenues, bowl pooling, etc. in half for the remainder of the current contract and distribute that money to the other 9 teams in the conference. The other 9 schools will vote for that and if Baylor objects, they can voluntarily leave the conference. Baylor won't obviously do that. Yeah yeah, I know that maybe there is a provision in the contract that would prevent that, but if I am the Big 12 I am looking into this while the NCAA does their "investigation". It may be far more punitive to take half their distribution than boot them out of the conference, putting Baylor significantly behind financially as the realignment wheel starts spinning again. The rest might just then take care of itself.
-
Not sure if already posted/discussed, but this is how S&P predicts our final games: Upcoming Games Week Date Opponent Opp. S&P+ Rk Proj. W/L Proj. Margin Win Prob. Cumulative Proj. Wins 6 Win Total Odds (regular season only) Conference Win Total Odds 6 7 10/13/18 Baylor 64 W 9.6 71% 5.7 5 5 1% 3 1% 5 8 4 6 6% 4 6% 4 9 10/27/18 at Oklahoma State 21 L -7.5 33% 6.0 3 7 20% 5 20% 3 10 11/3/18 West Virginia 11 L -6.6 35% 6.4 2 8 34% 6 34% 2 11 11/10/18 at Texas Tech 28 L -4.1 41% 6.8 1 9 28% 7 28% 1 12 11/17/18 Iowa State 45 W 4.7 61% 7.4 0 10 11% 8 11% 0 13 11/23/18 at Kansas 104 W 14.8 80% 8.2 -1 11 2% 9 2% Oklahoma State is considered the 3rd best team in our conference using S&P and it would also be our biggest loss. Tell me if that makes any sense. While it is possible a loss can occur from one of those 3 games, i don't think it will be all 3. Will check this again after this weeks results, my guess is it will predict us either beating Ok State or Tech.
-
Perfect opponent to come off of the Red River Rivalry (other than OU's opponent - BYE) Baylor does offense, but digging into the stats suggest they can be a lot of noise and fury, but not signify much. They rank reasonably high on efficiency, but not explosiveness, which is the complete opposite of OU. Get them behind the chains and their offense trends to below average. They are a surprisingly poor red zone team and of course give up lots of sack opportunities. Baylor is also -2 on turnover margin but actually picks up 2 pts on turnover luck per game because they should have given up more which means opportunities exist Baylor's defense is bad and they only thing they actually statistically do well is red zone defense. Of course, the number of explosive plays given up sort of negates that. Forced 3 of their 5 total turnovers received in last weeks game which means they don't force turnovers and won't against a team that is good at taking care of the ball. Baylor is significantly better at punting, but that isn't saying much. Unfortunately we have given up points due to our punting in every game this year so expect that to continue this week. Their place kicker is about average for CFB which means that the placekicking game doesn't give them a big advantage. Nothing else special about their special teams which are in the bottom quartile (other than net punting). Texas should win handily unless we go -4 or worse on turnovers or have 150+ penalty yards (or both).
-
Halfway through, the Big 12 to me breaks out as follows: True Contenders Texas, OU and WVa. OU and WVa aren't surprises, though Texas is and may end up being better than the other 2. OU will probably go on their post Texas loss run as they did in 2006, 2008, 2013, etc. WVa has been pretty sloppy with the ball so far this season with 10 total turnovers lost and if that trend continues, they will lose to both OU and Texas, as both of those teams do a much better job of taking care of the football. Will Grier needs to do a better job of taking care of the football as he is responsible for 8 of the 10 turnovers. Best bet is Red River Shootout 2, Offensive Boogaloo, at the Death Star in December for Big XII-II championship. The First Alternate TCU is the one team that could crash the above party and we will know the next 2 weeks as they face Tech and OU at home. Win both of those and they move into a good position with a November date in Morgantown looming. The rest of their schedule is against the bottom of the conference and they should pick up 4 wins against the State of Kansas, Baylor, and OSU. Spoilers Tech and ISU - Neither will likely win the conference but can certainly shape the race. ISU already has 2 conference losses and face WVa this weekend which might ruin WVa's season to date if ISU gets a win. Tech is Tech and has already shown they can be up or down, but get both TX and OU in Lubbock and can certainly throw a scare their direction. Both are also capable of losing to Kansas State. That's just who they are. WTF? Team Oklahoma State - Beat Boise convincingly at home, but get drilled by both Tech and ISU at home? Can't figure this team out, but did note at the beginning of the season I thought this team might be due for a rebuilding year which appears to be playing out. Will struggle for bowl eligibility as they still have yet to see Texas, OU, TCU, and WVa. Shades of 2014 pre Mason Rudolph. Home for the Holidays The State of Kansas and Baylor. KU needs no explanation, though they at times have been a little spunkier. KState is reaching the sad end of the Bill Snyder era. Baylor may have won their last game of the season on Saturday (congrats on the Kansas state championship) with games still to face against everybody above them except OU.
-
My mother...was taken from my house by the Communists in the middle of the night when I was ten years old. She was sent to a slave labor camp, where she labored for twelve years. Finally, they released her and she was on a boat to America to re-unite with us...but she was served some bad fish, and she died...on the high seas.
-
I thought the line of OU -7.5 was a gross overreaction to last Saturday's games and meant to entice $ to come in on the Texas side. The line should be OU -4.5, which is in line with the winning margin of the last 3 games. OU's schedule has been markedly easier to date. Best win is probably 1-3 Iowa State? Their 3 Power 5 wins are against 0-4 UCLA who is terrible, Iowa State, and Baylor. They haven't seen team speed and athleticism to what they will see from Texas on Saturday. I'd set the O/U on points by the winning team at 28 and the only way it gets significantly above that number is if there are a rash of turnovers to one side. Speaking of turnovers, the team that does +2 or better will win the game. Here's the thing though. Neither team has created many (TX has the advantage here 7 to 5) nor have they given many up (OU has been better - 3 vs TX 5). Both are at +2 for the season which means that turnovers have not been a big part of the story. (Best in the country KU at +12...and they still suck). I would not expect turnovers to be a big part of the story on Saturday either. Special teams may be the decider. OU's has been about average, while TX has had a much higher beta. Punting may be the big story here. OU is average at about 40 net, but TX is near the bottom at 33 net. 7 yards of field position could be big in this game and the punting game has cost Texas points from field position in every game. Forget Kyler Murray. If Texas doesn't do better at this part of the game, it may end up being the biggest factor. The Texas staff should spend extra time this week on it because this is a big issue. Be helpful if Dicker the kicker doesnt shank a kick or 2 either. Can't lose 3 to 6 points from this. Getting off the field on 3rd down will be key as well. OU's defense is 99th in this metric at 42.4%, Texas is better at 34.6%.On the flip side, OU converts at almost 55%, which is 7th in the country, while Texas is near the NCAA average at 41.3%, right there with the Domers and LS-Youuuuuuuuu. Sustaining drives will be key for Texas and OU's defense isn't particularly adept at stopping 3rd downs. I expect a tight one score game if the teams play to what I expect. 50/50 on this one as to who wins.
-
1990 will always be my favorite. Got 50 yard line seats about 30 rows up via the student draw. Right before the Lashar kick the whole place is going nuts. When he pushed it wide, you could see the whole Sooner side deflate while the good guys were going nuts. We were about 3 seats over from the divide so it was incredible. Somehow got onto the field after the game and were waving our Texas flag at midfield chanting OU sucks with at least 50 other students. Woke up the next morning and found our picture in the Dallas Morning news as well. Still have that page laminated somewhere in one of my memorabilia boxes.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!