I'd prefer the status quo, but that ain't what this thread is about. A conference with ND, Texas, FSU, and Clemson is more compelling to me than the most of the current Big 12 or any alignment with the PAC. (Assuming we still have the RRR, which is a big if). UNC would be fun while Mac is there. And we owe some payback to Miami, Syracuse, NCState, Virginia and Virginia Tech for recent-ish history. We lost to 7 current ACC teams 8 times in the 90s (still bitter). Maybe the ACC is not as bad as we think, at least compared to us. We have a losing record to more ACC teams than we do with any other conference (or tied if you don't count ND). Although we have current scoreboard, barely, on the new ACC with our last win v ND. More importantly to me, the ACC timezone is 53% of the US population and one hour later than DKR. PAC is 24% and mostly two hours earlier. The eyeballs and the interest are east, not west. I am a big Astros fan, but live in the Eastern time zone. Since their move to the AL West (still bitter), I rarely watch them anymore, or try and can't stay up. My favorite baseball team became an afterthought in the regular season because they moved three time zones away from me for most of their games. Obviously I live in ACC country-ish (Big East hoops and Big 10 football have as much claim to DC as the ACC...but it's in the neighborhood), so I'm more familiar/comfortable than folks back home. And it'd be much easier to integrated LHN with an ESPN conference. If it's still around for the next round of expansion. I always thought, before ND went half in, that the ACC was holding the last two spots for ND and Texas. Still kinda do think that. While it'd feel culturally weird for a bit, that'd be a power conference in all the big three sports. And not much weirder than the move from SWC to Big 12.