Jump to content

Saint Austin

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

745 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

3846 profile views
  1. That's not an option though. It's 1+7 (which is what we currently have and sucks) or 3+6. Obviously OU is the primary rival, but to join this conference and NOT play A&M or Arkansas every year would be a fucking travesty. They'll need to tweak some things in '26 so that we alternate A&M/Arkansas at home each year, but to not play you're top three historical rivals every season when you're in the same conference as all three for the first time since 1919 would be lunacy.
  2. Don't get me wrong, I want Ukraine to take back the entire Donbas and Crimea, too, but I'm not sure for how long how feasible that will be.
  3. I wouldn't have a problem postponing Ukraine's membership in NATO if it meant Russia returning to the 2022 borders, but this deal sucks.
  4. Is it possible that W offered to endorse Kamala, but she declined it for fear it might alienate the far-left, leading them to stay home?
  5. Lifelong conservative. I voted third-party in '16 and abstained in '20. Last week I voted blue for both president and senator for the first time.
  6. Am I the only one who thinks even this version of the MW would still be an upgrade over the Sun Belt for Texas St.?
  7. Weird move. Sam Houston would make a lot more sense.
  8. This version of the Pac doesn't seem like much of an upgrade from the American, but I could see UTEP or Texas State upgrading to somewhere out west if given the opportunity.
  9. I think it's scripted, but it's still funny
  10. Good stuff. Only minor error I saw was identifying TCU (who wasn't even in the Big 12 yet) instead of Colorado as a potential member of a Pac-16.
×
×
  • Create New...