Jump to content

CustersDoctor

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CustersDoctor

  1. I never thought much of CKK's ability to watch film. In 2016 Tech lost at OkSt 45-44. We missed a game winning field goal as the clock ran out. The holder flinched and moved the ball at the last second. Coaches watch the game film on Sunday's and he and his assistants didn't notice that the holder messed up on the kick. A reporter asked him about the hold at the Monday press conference and CKK was at a loss. He had watched game film for hours and missed something so basic that even the ESPNU announcers noticed during the game.
  2. You are absolutely correct about the CFP money. The WAC10 will almost NEVER get two teams into the 12 team playoff. The BIG12 & the ACC will usually have two but almost never three. The BIG and the SEC will usually have three. The WAC10 will get their automatic bid and that's about it, then they'll divide that revenue by 10. Their total income per team will be far behind the BIG12 because their 10 team league wont receive as much playoff money. But their new deal is more about appearing to be as good at the BIG12s, its about saving face, its about being able to claim that they own the late late time slot.
  3. I now firmly believe the WAC10 deal will be a 6yr 1.8 billion dollar contract. They will stand pat with 10 teams. Therefore they will each get 30mil a year and can save face by by saying they have practically the same deal as the Big12 and a better deal than the ACC. But they can't expand because it dilutes the revenue. They shouldn't expand because the ten remaining teams know they are competing for limited OTA slots. They don't want to share their few daytime slots with two newbies. We've discussed in detail how no expansion option exists that brings good viewership. We all know that the WAC10 hopes to have three games a day on linear TV. If they have 12 schools, that puts 3 games on streaming. That 50/50 split is unacceptable! But if they only have 10 teams, that puts 3 games on linear and two on streaming which is a 60/40 split. This is way.
  4. How history will remember Kliavkoff
  5. I saw this on another chat room and since its on the internet it must be true. "The new PAC10 media rights deal will be announced on April 12th. It will be a six year 2.4billion deal. That comes out to 30million a year per team, BUT ONLY IF THEY DON'T EXPAND! They will stay at ten teams. This is the strategy the Big12 employed when we lost our first two teams. We stayed at ten and therefore our payout per team went up with only ten mouths to feed. There is absolutely ZERO reason for them to expand considering the teams available. All the schools that the PAC has considered will be left at the alter. The conference leaders will be able to claim that they did their due diligence to get back to 12 teams but none of the options passed to high standards for admission into the conference of champions." So everybody stays, no expansion, and their media rights deal will be smaller than the Big12's, but with just 10 teams they'll each get almost as much as a Big12 team.
  6. This guy's literally doing his PAC10 update from a hotel room while on vacation with his parents. I'm pretty sure that after the podcast he's got to go sit in the cuck chair while his GF gets some BBC.
  7. Dodd being a PAC mouthpiece totally letting UA president Robbins take the "What me worry" approach. How do you not follow up with any meaningful questioning of Robbins expression of letting the process continue pretty much indefinitely.
  8. Or you can literally hang a PAC12 flag on the basement door and viola, you're an expert.
  9. I hate these basement broadcasters who act like they has some sort of inside knowledge. When in reality they know less than Wayne's World. This guy has to be the worst one out there. He spends the first five minutes of his video talking about his mini helmet collection. Then he spouts off made up BS about realignment.
  10. 1st. I don't for a second think that the PAC12 deal will be equal to or superior to the NEW12 deal. 2nd Once the deal is revealed to the current PAC12th members they will probably have about a week to review it before signing their GOR. I guarantee you that if too much of the revenue promises are performance based some will reject it if those performance bonuses are likely to be unreasonable. And I guarantee you that even if the revenue promises are solid but rely to heavily on not yet viable formats (like streaming) some will reject it. 3rd Can you imagine the fit that FSU is going to throw if the ACC contract is all the sudden the dead last revenue generator of the P5.
  11. Drove to Phoenix from Lubbock this weekend to see my daughter. It's a 12 hour drive. UA in Tucson is a little closer than that. I will certainly go to Tempe and Tuscon at least once if either join the New12.
  12. So he's saying if their deal is 29mil a year they won't move. I think that's been the general consensus from generally everybody ever since the NEW12 got their TV deal. But the general consensus is the PAC10's deal isn't going to be 29mil, so are they bolting if its 27mil? Being 2mil a year behind the Big12 for 6 years in $12,000,000. But being 4mil a year behind the Big12 over a 6 year deal is $24,000,000. Further more, just because they'll stay put for 29mil a year doesn't mean CU will.
  13. We all agree that streaming is currently clunky. It lags behind the live broadcast: just try listening to the radio and watching a game on Prime at the same time. The stream is running about 30 seconds behind the radio broadcast. There is no regulatory reason for this, streaming DOES NOT have to lag in order to edit some obscenity like TV and Radio do. So actually streaming would be ahead of Radio and TV if it weren't for technical issues. I'm not sure what the technical issues are that make it lag so badly, but I'm pretty sure if I can play a video game seamlessly with people on three continents, that I should be able to watch a football game that is beaming from one single source.
  14. If UU is working so hard to save the PAC10 wouldn't they go ahead and sign their GOR? Asking for a friend.
  15. UU would be 5th in attendance in the NEW16 and ASU would be 11th. And UH is still dead last by a mile.
  16. All the streaming companies do some financing through SVB. Can't imagine that they're feeling more generous after that bank collapse.
  17. The thing that scares me about going to Colorado is that they have been saving batteries for 10 years now.
  18. No doubt. These schools are self reporting and attendance is based on ticket sales not butts in seats. And sometimes a business may buy the remaining tickets to get to a sell out and nobody uses those seats and they can't even give them away. I live here is Lubbock and United Supermarkets often buys the last thousand or so tickets at a reduced price just so we can sell out the stadium. I bet anything Nike has done that once or twice.
  19. Just to illustrate how poor a choice Rutgers & Maryland are, they played each other this year and the ratings were terrible. 97,000. That's one of the worst rated games of the year. Future Big12 bottom feeders Cincy & UCF played each other and had 10Xs the audience. 1.06mil
  20. Here's attendance figures I found NEW12 ISU 57,344. TCU 46,562. UK 43,076. KST 51,165. BU 45,463. TECH 56,870. OKST 54,735. WVU 47,658. BYU 59,674. Cincy 38,117. UCF 41,542. CougHigh 25,073 PAC10 UO 54,950. UW 62,933. ORST 31,498. WASU 26,185. UU 52,057. CAL 38,596. STAN 29,965. UA 44,209. AST 43,081. CU 42,847. POTENTIAL TARGETS SDSU 29,892. SMU 24,971. FRESNO 39,067. COLSt 26,891. BOISE 35,121. UTSA 26,835. TULANE 20,361. NEVADA 14,905. MEMPHIS 26,196. UNLV 22,112.
  21. My message to Wilner
  22. The networks and the Big time programs both want conference consolidation. The networks would rather just broadcast marquee games. Big time programs like the idea of the giant pie of cash being cut into fewer and fewer pieces, thus increasing their share. But in the last thirty years the only legit consolidation was when the BIG8 added the four good Texas schools and shed the dead weight of TCU, SMU and Coug High. And then when the Big East money makers joined the ACC. But it now in order to stay relevant, the BIG12 had to let TCU back into the party, and now adding UH, Cincy and UCF the numbers of schools in the major conferences is growing not shrinking. Soon the PAC12 may replace USC & UCLA with SDSU & SMU. Its going in the wrong direction!
×
×
  • Create New...