I've appreciated your brutal honesty many times. Maybe less so this time. Terribly obtuse might be the worst crime. Anyway...
I'm saying the pubs consider "lesser" and supposed lib moral infractions, and their own "worse" moral views as equivalent. (Implied, this isn't justified). Also, that while they might see some trouble sometimes with their own views, they just can't take on the dem views because they are creatures of their own comfort. One of J. K Galbraiths last books was "The Culture of Contentment" and it has probably overly influenced me. The thesis is that it is difficult, too difficult for most people, to vote against their comfort. Now that most Americans are in the comfort zone, policies will be geared to the desires of the comfortable, not to those suffering. The pubs are simply showing this by example. As have the centrist dems of the Clinton era. This is an observation more than an indictment. At this point. I'm well among the comfortable, but don't see my comfort as a justification for policy. Yay me.
I don't remember the context of the post you reference...what this thought was responding to. Another problem with age.