GW Hayduke

That is your problem. We know you don’t think Gabbard’s lawsuit is frivolous, just like Nunes wants people to believe his lawsuits aren’t frivolous. Your problem along with many Bernie Bros is jumping in bed with Gabbard just to “cancel” the Dems and joining her chorus of defenders that include Richard Spencer, David Duke, Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, and Greenwald. I think the appropriate phrase for this is “hook, line, and sinker.”

I mean there is a Bernie bro in another thread hoping Gabbard wins a frivolous lawsuit against the Dems’ 2016 candidate

Lulz Gabbard using the same method as Nunes. What a joke.

Impeachment wasn’t ever about getting the senate to remove Trump. There was never a chance 2/3 of the senate would vote to remove. This was always about increasing the chance trump is removed in the 2020 election and the Dems winning the senate. This trial in the senate along with any new evidence and witness testimony will keep trump’s crimes and abuses front and center for the public for a time. It has potential to sway the 2020 election. We aren’t trying to sway trumpkins. We are trying to sway independents and fringe republicans.

If this guy has what he says he has, it would be big, but this is where journalistic integrity comes into play - important scoops like this. I don’t know this guy or forensicwhatever. If this is true, I hope they pass it on to the Times or Post to authenticate

r/iamabadass

You should read his second sentence along with his first sentence and try to be less sensitive. The shooter used a firearm. Firearms are readily available in our society due in part to pro-gun culture. Pro-gun culture resists addressing this problem, increasing the likelihood these types of events occur again. This shouldn’t be a controversial take or anything that should be disputed. I’m not sure if the below video has been posted; but it provides quality insight. The bottom line is that the trained volunteer security guard (seemingly the guy being reported as ex-FBI) did what a security guard needed to do, while all the other congregates that pulled their weapons decreased the safety of others - and notably one guy got shot likely because he tried to pull out his firearm. This is a perfect example why we need armed, trained security personnel and not joe random’s running around pointing guns at people.

Tulsi is a victim!!!!?! lulz you guys with your weird victim complex is such a strange phenomenon. Can you relate to the guy in this video?

How can you tell me there isn’t 100 plus contacts? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report#Conspiracy_or_coordination “The investigation found there were over 100 contacts between Trump campaign advisors and individuals affiliated with the Russian government, before and after the election, but the evidence was insufficient to show an illegal conspiracy.[82] The New York Times estimated as many as 140 contacts between "Mr. Trump and his associates and Russian nationals and WikiLeaks or their intermediaries" in the report.[83]” I understand you think that trump’s campaign manager giving polling data to people with ties to Russian intelligence (OVD and Kilimnik) as harmless/normal/innocent and it’s just a coincidence that Russian intelligence was also targeting through social media the people that were polled. And stone? Did you concede that?

Really? You aren’t familiar with the report? Section IV, pages 66-168 is titled “Russian Government Links To and Contacts With The Trump Campaign.” It is a huge art of the report. If you question this basic understanding, then ?? Page 129 details Manafort and Gates giving polling data to Kilimnik, dude with ties to Russian intelligence. Stone is redacted from the report except for the descriptions inferred from the questions given to Trump. You’ll need to look to his indictment for hard details. Wikileaks is identifies as “organization 1.” This is basic shit. If you aren’t up to speed and able acknowledge basic facts, then ?? what are you doing here?

I captured Mueller’s finding that Russia attacked us to benefit trump and trump campaign’s work with Russia, plus the consequences of that attack, everything Russia got in return, while pointing out the obvious motive for trump being putin’s lapdog. It is all connected. You can’t document an attack without acknowledging the motives and consequences of that attack. What did I overstate from mueller? The reality is that Page’s warrant is irrelevant to everyone of the major facts that I stated. It has no bearing on the arc of the trump-Russia-GOP storyline. It is the epitome of a molehill

When your candidate's campaign has 100+ contacts with a hostile foreign country, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When your candidate's campaign provided internal polling data to that hostile foreign country, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When your candidate's campaign was coordinating with wikileaks (a cutout of that hostile foreign country), WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When that hostile foreign country attacks our election to benefit your candidate, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When it is documented that your candidate attempted to obstruct the investigation into the hostile foreign country's attacks, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When your candidate goes to Helsinki and sucks off the leader of that hostile foreign country, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When your candidate spontaneously pulls troops out of Syria, screwing an ally while benefiting that hostile foreign country, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When your dad is ashamed that all the chickens have been violated, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When your candidate held up military aid to an ally in active conflict with that hostile foreign country, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When your candidate can't stop loving the leader of North Korea, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? When BoTh SiDeS only takes you so far, WhAtAbOuT fIsA??!? The best is that if you ask "WhAtAbOuT fIsA" enough times, you can pretend there isn't a motive behind all of these actions, you can pretend that your candidate has shared his tax returns and financials.

When a retarded kid shits his pants, he can tell his mom, “whatabout the fisa abuses?”

Solid opinion piece by Kamarck with Brookings. She goes through the possible motives driving Trump's kowtowing relationship with Russia. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2019/12/13/why-trumps-tax-returns-are-so-important-this-week-in-impeachment/

Except for the question of magnitude. On one side, we had a potus attempting to stop/interfere with the investigation into russian attack on our election to aid that potus. On the other side, something inconsequential - some inappropriate activities by investigators to get a warrant that led to nothing. Its the classic mountain vs. molehill. This is why the chicken meme is so funny. We are wondering why you keep chasing it?

The problem is that the entire right-side of the political spectrum is blowing this up. It is support for various Trump talking points like 1) the fbi is crooked, 2) it was a with hunt, 3) deep state something, 4) this is evidence of political bias, 4) or that it somehow has any influence on what we know. Nothing in the IG report impacted the Mueller Report or his findings, the numerous indictments under the Russia investigation or our knowledge of the trump tower meeting, Stone’s work with Wikileaks, the Moscow Tower project, the 100+ contacts between Russia and the campaign, or Manafort providing internal polling info to the Russians. The bottomline is that the inappropriate conduct related to Page is unfortunate and should be addressed but is inconsequential to what we know about the campaign’s coordination with Russia.

The IG report is silent on that question. The most important point is that information from the Page warrant did not impact the Mueller Report or his findings, the numerous indictments under the Russia investigation, the world learning about the trump tower meeting, the world learning about Stone’s work with Wikileaks, the world learning about the Moscow Tower project, the world learning about the 100+ contacts between Russia and the campaign, or the world learning about Manafort providing internal polling info to the Russians. The bottomline is that the inappropriate conduct related to Page is unfortunate and should be addressed but is inconsequential to what we know about the campaign’s coordination with Russia.

If you haven’t experienced the tender soft meat from a chicken, then you just don’t understand what motivates Anastasis

Honest question. Where do you get your information, News, or sources of media that led you to your understanding of the situation?

Can we first share our war stories from the war on thanksgiving? I shot my first turkey. For some reason I got tackled by the guy working the frozen food section at heb

I will be able to ignore corruption from MY TEAM if I think that the OTHER TEAM is looney, fat, hypocritical, and bad. I am able to do this by consuming media that focuses my emotions.