GW Hayduke

bad_teammate is consistent with division of the left as the best path forward. No surprise there. Dividing the left is a goal of right-wing politics. He carries that pail like a good trumpkin. Hugo should know better. Wtf dude. Obama’s points were: ”work with those that have flaws” ”find common ground” ”acknowledge the world is messy” ”acknowledge political opponents are actual people” ”casting stones, judgements on social media IS NOT ENOUGH” These are all hugely important points. We are in primary season and after that the general election. Taking issue with or being offended by Obama's positions is rather amazing imo

Here is a real live person that is afraid of the “deep state.”

And this is why so many on the right stroke out when she does anything. Hillary and Pelosi are the definition of competency. They can’t help but get an emotional gut reaction.

You always ask irrelevant questions. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity run the same shtick.

Useful idiot = asset

Is it more telling that Tulsi is being defended by Greenwald, BadTeammate, David Duke, AmericanSwindle, or Tucker Carlson? fixed

Imagine if Trump isn’t removed by the Senate and is re-elected. What kind of BS is he going to do during a second term?

Is it more telling that Tulsi is being defended by Greenwald, BadTeammate, David Duke, or Tucker Carlson?

I understand you aren’t sure Putin knows of Gabbard even though his troll farms are working to promote her and her talking points. I also understand that you see Putin as someone with “tremendous power” and parrot it on anonymous boards. I also understand that you bend-backwards with bizarre logic to defend Gabbard, while also doing the same for Assange and promoting the divide-the-left narrative. It is bizarre someone pretending to be “left” would defend Gabbard - a real head scratcher

I understand you aren’t sure Putin knows of Gabbard even though his troll farms are working to promote her and her talking points. I also understand that you see Putin as someone with “tremendous power” and parrot it on anonymous boards

This is the backbending logic I was talking about. Weird. Even weirder is your use of “powerful” to describe Putin. You’ve done it before. Did you get that from r/the_donald or from Richard Spencer?

Your position has now shifted to maybe Putin doesn’t pay attention to US politics. Why do you feel the need to use such bizarre, back-pending logic while siding with Tucker Carlson, drudge, r/the_donald, Richard Spencer, David duke, Donald trump, and Steve Bannon?

No. My contention is that she pushes the same talking points that Putin (and a part of the right) wants pushed and a foreign policy that is in-line with Putin, while getting psyops support (putin’s Twitter bots, etc.) and far-right support (Tucker Carlson, drudge, trump himself, r/the_donald, Richard Spencer’s, David duke). Her talking points are amplified by Russia psyops and some right wing talking heads. She is purposely sowing discord on the left and using right wing media to do it. Whines about the unfairness of the DNC, etc. She whines about and attacks the media just like republicans do. She is a documented apologist of the Assad regime and pushes their talking points. She met him while we were in open conflict with him, while he was an accused war criminal here in the US, and had no diplomatic relations (she basically met with our enemy). She parroted the idea that Assad’s enemies were “terrorists.” She parroted the idea that all Syrians she met supported Assad even though her trip was arranged by the Assad regime. She and only 4 others voted against condemning Assad after he gassed Syrian civilians. She voted against accepting Syrian refugees. Gabbard is supported by Bannon, who tried to get her a cabinet position under trump. She voted against the Magnitsky Act. She pushed the Trump/Putin narrative of “no collusion.” Pushed the idea that removal of trump would lead to “civil war.” These are all the same right-wing talking points that Russian bots amplify and many here have picked up.

Just don’t think too hard. That was in 2013 prior to her shifting of foreign policies and adopting putin’s Talking points.

Fox News’ website is running a headline this morning that Taylor’s testimony was ‘Destroyed’ by Ratcliffe. Per McCarthy, “We can’t really talk about it.... Schaffer’s won’t let us talk about what happened.”

Yes. We know you don’t really care about Tulsi. You are just bending over backwards to defend her because you don’t want folks speaking bad about Russia. Thx for the honesty. Makes total sense. It also makes sense that you’ve vehemently defended Assange and defended Russian election meddling. It makes further sense that you were forced by the Dems to vote Trump and that your preferred strategy is to divide the left.

Wow. That was 2015. How long has she been pushing russia’s policies and messages? Has she ever shared a position that was critical of Putin?

Is she doesn’t disavow Russian meddling that supports her campaign, that is essentially approval. Approval of Russian support while touting their policies. Seems rather obvious. I had forgotten about this story from 2017. ”Democrats were silent on Thursday as Tulsi Gabbard, one of the party’s sitting lawmakers in Congress, announced that she had met with Bashar al-Assad during a trip to war-torn Syria and dismissed his entire opposition as “terrorists”. Democratic leaders were mum on the decision by one of their sitting lawmakers to meet with a dictator whom the US government has dubbed a war criminal for his use of chemical weapons against civilians. Gabbard’s trip raised alarms over a potential violation of the Logan Act, a federal statute barring unauthorized individuals from conferring with a foreign government involved in a dispute with the US. The US currently has no diplomatic relations with Syria.” https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democrats

Some here are going to really really great lengths to bend backwards and defend Tulsi. Kind of weird. Haven’t seen this since Assange. Strange.

Democratic presidential hopeful Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has apparently gotten an endorsement she said she can do without — from former KKK leader David Duke. The 68-year-old white supremacist and former GOP Louisiana state senator plastered a banner on his Twitter page prominently featuring a photograph of the Hawaiian lawmaker, the New York Post reported. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/rep-tulsi-gabbard-gets-2020-endorsement-from-david-duke-2019-10-19

Source expanding on an idea from earlier. “The Russian propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 U.S. election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat who earlier this month declared her intention to run for president in 2020. An NBC News analysis of the main English-language news sites employed by Russia in its 2016 election meddling shows Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, who is set to make her formal announcement Saturday, has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016.” https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russia-s-propaganda-machine-discovers-2020-democratic-candidate-tulsi-gabbard-n964261