Jump to content

GW Hayduke

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GW Hayduke

  1. We also need to consider if we are talking about bible Jesus or supply-side Jesus
  2. FYI. This is Coulter taking one for the team and making it more newsworthy about Tulsi’s vote by pretending to make a dumb statement
  3. It is so unfair. Obama is mean. You are a real victim.
  4. For folks that didn’t listen to what Obama actually said or may have forgotten considering all the bluster. Below are Obama’s points: ”work with those that have flaws” ”find common ground” ”acknowledge the world is messy” ”acknowledge political opponents are actual people” ”casting stones, judgements on social media IS NOT ENOUGH” ”bad teammate acting as a victim doesn’t make him one”
  5. Holy Strawman Batman!! Fallacies are the sign of a weak position. It’s best to change positions when you find yourself using them. Except when using them to divide the left. In those cases, you should apologize to everyone and delete your account
  6. He isn’t saying anything that you think he is. My recommendation is to take a break, loosen up, and then listen to Obama again. We all carry baggage and it influences how we process stuff. Maybe take a jog or stare into a small dime-sized mirror.
  7. bad_teammate is consistent with division of the left as the best path forward. No surprise there. Dividing the left is a goal of right-wing politics. He carries that pail like a good trumpkin. Hugo should know better. Wtf dude. Obama’s points were: ”work with those that have flaws” ”find common ground” ”acknowledge the world is messy” ”acknowledge political opponents are actual people” ”casting stones, judgements on social media IS NOT ENOUGH” These are all hugely important points. We are in primary season and after that the general election. Taking issue with or being offended by Obama's positions is rather amazing imo
  8. Here is a real live person that is afraid of the “deep state.”
  9. And this is why so many on the right stroke out when she does anything. Hillary and Pelosi are the definition of competency. They can’t help but get an emotional gut reaction.
  10. You always ask irrelevant questions. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity run the same shtick.
  11. Useful idiot = asset
  12. Is it more telling that Tulsi is being defended by Greenwald, BadTeammate, David Duke, AmericanSwindle, or Tucker Carlson? fixed
  13. Imagine if Trump isn’t removed by the Senate and is re-elected. What kind of BS is he going to do during a second term?
  14. Is it more telling that Tulsi is being defended by Greenwald, BadTeammate, David Duke, or Tucker Carlson?
  15. I understand you aren’t sure Putin knows of Gabbard even though his troll farms are working to promote her and her talking points. I also understand that you see Putin as someone with “tremendous power” and parrot it on anonymous boards. I also understand that you bend-backwards with bizarre logic to defend Gabbard, while also doing the same for Assange and promoting the divide-the-left narrative. It is bizarre someone pretending to be “left” would defend Gabbard - a real head scratcher
  16. I understand you aren’t sure Putin knows of Gabbard even though his troll farms are working to promote her and her talking points. I also understand that you see Putin as someone with “tremendous power” and parrot it on anonymous boards
  17. This is the backbending logic I was talking about. Weird. Even weirder is your use of “powerful” to describe Putin. You’ve done it before. Did you get that from r/the_donald or from Richard Spencer?
  18. Your position has now shifted to maybe Putin doesn’t pay attention to US politics. Why do you feel the need to use such bizarre, back-pending logic while siding with Tucker Carlson, drudge, r/the_donald, Richard Spencer, David duke, Donald trump, and Steve Bannon?
  19. No. My contention is that she pushes the same talking points that Putin (and a part of the right) wants pushed and a foreign policy that is in-line with Putin, while getting psyops support (putin’s Twitter bots, etc.) and far-right support (Tucker Carlson, drudge, trump himself, r/the_donald, Richard Spencer’s, David duke). Her talking points are amplified by Russia psyops and some right wing talking heads. She is purposely sowing discord on the left and using right wing media to do it. Whines about the unfairness of the DNC, etc. She whines about and attacks the media just like republicans do. She is a documented apologist of the Assad regime and pushes their talking points. She met him while we were in open conflict with him, while he was an accused war criminal here in the US, and had no diplomatic relations (she basically met with our enemy). She parroted the idea that Assad’s enemies were “terrorists.” She parroted the idea that all Syrians she met supported Assad even though her trip was arranged by the Assad regime. She and only 4 others voted against condemning Assad after he gassed Syrian civilians. She voted against accepting Syrian refugees. Gabbard is supported by Bannon, who tried to get her a cabinet position under trump. She voted against the Magnitsky Act. She pushed the Trump/Putin narrative of “no collusion.” Pushed the idea that removal of trump would lead to “civil war.” These are all the same right-wing talking points that Russian bots amplify and many here have picked up.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...