Jump to content

GW Hayduke

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GW Hayduke

  1. Connect the dots between your post and my post.
  2. There is probably a need for defining terms. What is an asset? A puppet? Do they need to be on the FSB payroll or is it enough to receive support in the form of dark campaign money or psyops (troll farm support) enough? Do they need be completely controlled, or do they need to simply further and amplify the message and policies of adversaries?
  3. I understand your position has moved from Tulsi isn’t a puppet of a foreign adversary, to everyone is a puppet, to finally no one is a puppet. Flynn, Stein, and Trump say hi.
  4. Your position has moved from Tulsi isn’t a puppet of a foreign adversary to EVERYONE is a puppet to foreign adversaries.
  5. Outside candidates are never propped up by and push policies of our adversaries https://theintercept.com/2018/04/26/russia-jill-stein-senate-intelligence/
  6. Lulz Assange bro, Bernie bro, bro that thinks the best path forward is to divide the left, bro that was forced by the Dems to vote trump, is now defending Tulsi. The script is transparent
  7. A gif is your best response to a supposed Dem candidate having the same positions and talking points as trump, alt-right, and russians? why would a Russian mole do things like: •say "it's time to move on" from the Mueller Report immediately after it was released. https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-twitter-trump-russia-probe-1380775 •Say indicting Trump would lead to a Civil War (Hm what a familiar talking point) https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/435780-tulsi-gabbard-trump-indictment-might-have-led-to-civil-war\ •Say there is "no compelling cause" for impeachment and that "Congress needs to exercise oversight over the information that’s been leaked" and that, regarding impeachment, "what I think most people will see is, ‘Hey, this is another move by Democrats to get rid of Donald Trump,’ further deepening the already hyperpartisan divides that we have in this country.”
  8. They carry Trump, the alt-right, and Russia's water here in the US. They have the same talking points and audience/supporters and Tulsi. So you are right it isn't hard.
  9. Trump pushed the same US foreign policy and talking points that Putin wants pushed. Putin helped get Trump elected. Tulsi pushes the same US foreign policy and talking points that Putin wants pushed. It isn't a coincidence that Richard Spencer, Steve Bannon, Ron Paul, Drudge, and Tucker Carlson all express support for her. This isn't hard.
  10. I thought it was reported from the beginning that the actual transcript of the Ukraine call and numerous others were in a code-level secure place. Did I get that wrong
  11. My comment was referring to the Lebron “scandal.” But good point on Pelosi. She is consistent on democratic principles. Very notable. Check out HB1 which would strengthen our democracy here. It passed the House. Just need the senate and White House to get on board. “The For The People Act of 2019 (H.R. 1, 2019)[1][2] is a bill introduced and passed in the United States House of Representatives to expand voting rights, limit partisan gerrymandering, strengthen ethics rules, and limit the influence of private donor money in politics.[3] It was introduced by John Sarbanes(D-MD) on January 3, 2019, on behalf of the newly elected Democratic majority as the first official legislation of the 116th United States Congress.[3][4] The bill was passed by the House on March 8, 2019 by a vote of 234–193 along strict party lines.[5][6] To take effect, it would also need to be passed by the Senate, which has not occurred as of September 2019.[7]“ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_the_People_Act_of_2019
  12. Fellow patriot! We hate China because DEMOCRACY!!?! But that’s without us worrying about foreign election interference or citizen’s United
  13. That’s exactly my point! What color is Facebook, Ivanka’s clothing lines, Toys R Us, and Walmart? Our stance is that racism no longer exists brother! The is about DEMOCRACY (sans gerrymandering and dark money). Update your talking points at r/the_donald.
  14. My take is the guy might be a genius. He meets all kinds of folks in his travels, talks a bit of shop, and then gives his business card and watches for the reaction. If the person laughs and walks away, he knows it wouldn’t be an easy mark. If the person nods his head and is ok with things, then he knows the person is a fucking idiot
  15. “Respect for state’s rights” was already taken
  16. Was there ever any explanation on why that guy named his company “fraud guarantee?” Is he bad at English or was it some sort of a honey trap for mobsters?
  17. Hey man, I thought we were Patriot brothers standing up for democracy?
  18. This isn’t about skin color dude!! Shhhhh! This is about DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!! don't let the cat out of the bag and when we scream DEMOCRACY make sure we aren’t talking about gerrymandering and dark money!!!
  19. I’m with you Patriot. We can either make stuff up about what he said or we can just go with screaming FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Either way should get our blood boiling. Anything to take down this non-White entertainer that profits from CHINA while getting uppity and speaking with his mouth
  20. Wow. This great. Just pretend like Lebron said all kinds of crazy stuff and then BOOM, we can collectively explode in righteous outrage together
  21. Hells YEAh Patriot!! We need to focus on corporate money related to China that way people might not notice Ukraine/Russian/Turkish monies driving that other scandal, which is definitely not actual scandal, just another nothingburger
  22. I don’t understand your comment. You must be a poet or otherwise intellectually superior. Maybe we should go with the narrative that our outrage meter blew up because FREEDOM OF SPEECH and DEMOCRACY
  23. For money!!?! I can’t believe someone would ever have financial interests. This is so much worse. What is this world coming to? Wait. We live in a capitalistic society and everyone has interests related to money. I’m so confused now
  24. Holes Shieite!! Dude actually indicated to be careful when speaking on a politically sensitive topic when being part of a broad organization!!?!? The words were so BAD!?! This is some truly scandalous shit. Can you imagine the outrage meter if he had indicated the US should strengthen its democracy by removing dark money and gerrymandering? Or for for god’s sake what if he had mentioned how anti-democratic it is that our foreign policy in Ukraine and Syria have been highjacked by the personal interests of the president?
×
×
  • Create New...