Jump to content

GW Hayduke

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GW Hayduke

  1. Just don’t think too hard. That was in 2013 prior to her shifting of foreign policies and adopting putin’s Talking points.
  2. Fox News’ website is running a headline this morning that Taylor’s testimony was ‘Destroyed’ by Ratcliffe. Per McCarthy, “We can’t really talk about it.... Schaffer’s won’t let us talk about what happened.”
  3. Yes. We know you don’t really care about Tulsi. You are just bending over backwards to defend her because you don’t want folks speaking bad about Russia. Thx for the honesty. Makes total sense. It also makes sense that you’ve vehemently defended Assange and defended Russian election meddling. It makes further sense that you were forced by the Dems to vote Trump and that your preferred strategy is to divide the left.
  4. Wow. That was 2015. How long has she been pushing russia’s policies and messages? Has she ever shared a position that was critical of Putin?
  5. Is she doesn’t disavow Russian meddling that supports her campaign, that is essentially approval. Approval of Russian support while touting their policies. Seems rather obvious. I had forgotten about this story from 2017. ”Democrats were silent on Thursday as Tulsi Gabbard, one of the party’s sitting lawmakers in Congress, announced that she had met with Bashar al-Assad during a trip to war-torn Syria and dismissed his entire opposition as “terrorists”. Democratic leaders were mum on the decision by one of their sitting lawmakers to meet with a dictator whom the US government has dubbed a war criminal for his use of chemical weapons against civilians. Gabbard’s trip raised alarms over a potential violation of the Logan Act, a federal statute barring unauthorized individuals from conferring with a foreign government involved in a dispute with the US. The US currently has no diplomatic relations with Syria.” https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democrats
  6. Some here are going to really really great lengths to bend backwards and defend Tulsi. Kind of weird. Haven’t seen this since Assange. Strange.
  7. Democratic presidential hopeful Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has apparently gotten an endorsement she said she can do without — from former KKK leader David Duke. The 68-year-old white supremacist and former GOP Louisiana state senator plastered a banner on his Twitter page prominently featuring a photograph of the Hawaiian lawmaker, the New York Post reported. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/rep-tulsi-gabbard-gets-2020-endorsement-from-david-duke-2019-10-19
  8. Source expanding on an idea from earlier. “The Russian propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 U.S. election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat who earlier this month declared her intention to run for president in 2020. An NBC News analysis of the main English-language news sites employed by Russia in its 2016 election meddling shows Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, who is set to make her formal announcement Saturday, has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016.” https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russia-s-propaganda-machine-discovers-2020-democratic-candidate-tulsi-gabbard-n964261
  9. Connect the dots between your post and my post.
  10. There is probably a need for defining terms. What is an asset? A puppet? Do they need to be on the FSB payroll or is it enough to receive support in the form of dark campaign money or psyops (troll farm support) enough? Do they need be completely controlled, or do they need to simply further and amplify the message and policies of adversaries?
  11. I understand your position has moved from Tulsi isn’t a puppet of a foreign adversary, to everyone is a puppet, to finally no one is a puppet. Flynn, Stein, and Trump say hi.
  12. Your position has moved from Tulsi isn’t a puppet of a foreign adversary to EVERYONE is a puppet to foreign adversaries.
  13. Outside candidates are never propped up by and push policies of our adversaries https://theintercept.com/2018/04/26/russia-jill-stein-senate-intelligence/
  14. Lulz Assange bro, Bernie bro, bro that thinks the best path forward is to divide the left, bro that was forced by the Dems to vote trump, is now defending Tulsi. The script is transparent
  15. A gif is your best response to a supposed Dem candidate having the same positions and talking points as trump, alt-right, and russians? why would a Russian mole do things like: •say "it's time to move on" from the Mueller Report immediately after it was released. https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-twitter-trump-russia-probe-1380775 •Say indicting Trump would lead to a Civil War (Hm what a familiar talking point) https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/435780-tulsi-gabbard-trump-indictment-might-have-led-to-civil-war\ •Say there is "no compelling cause" for impeachment and that "Congress needs to exercise oversight over the information that’s been leaked" and that, regarding impeachment, "what I think most people will see is, ‘Hey, this is another move by Democrats to get rid of Donald Trump,’ further deepening the already hyperpartisan divides that we have in this country.”
  16. They carry Trump, the alt-right, and Russia's water here in the US. They have the same talking points and audience/supporters and Tulsi. So you are right it isn't hard.
  17. Trump pushed the same US foreign policy and talking points that Putin wants pushed. Putin helped get Trump elected. Tulsi pushes the same US foreign policy and talking points that Putin wants pushed. It isn't a coincidence that Richard Spencer, Steve Bannon, Ron Paul, Drudge, and Tucker Carlson all express support for her. This isn't hard.
  18. I thought it was reported from the beginning that the actual transcript of the Ukraine call and numerous others were in a code-level secure place. Did I get that wrong
  19. If it walks like a duck
  20. My comment was referring to the Lebron “scandal.” But good point on Pelosi. She is consistent on democratic principles. Very notable. Check out HB1 which would strengthen our democracy here. It passed the House. Just need the senate and White House to get on board. “The For The People Act of 2019 (H.R. 1, 2019)[1][2] is a bill introduced and passed in the United States House of Representatives to expand voting rights, limit partisan gerrymandering, strengthen ethics rules, and limit the influence of private donor money in politics.[3] It was introduced by John Sarbanes(D-MD) on January 3, 2019, on behalf of the newly elected Democratic majority as the first official legislation of the 116th United States Congress.[3][4] The bill was passed by the House on March 8, 2019 by a vote of 234–193 along strict party lines.[5][6] To take effect, it would also need to be passed by the Senate, which has not occurred as of September 2019.[7]“ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_the_People_Act_of_2019
  21. Fellow patriot! We hate China because DEMOCRACY!!?! But that’s without us worrying about foreign election interference or citizen’s United
  22. That’s exactly my point! What color is Facebook, Ivanka’s clothing lines, Toys R Us, and Walmart? Our stance is that racism no longer exists brother! The is about DEMOCRACY (sans gerrymandering and dark money). Update your talking points at r/the_donald.
  23. My take is the guy might be a genius. He meets all kinds of folks in his travels, talks a bit of shop, and then gives his business card and watches for the reaction. If the person laughs and walks away, he knows it wouldn’t be an easy mark. If the person nods his head and is ok with things, then he knows the person is a fucking idiot
  24. “Respect for state’s rights” was already taken
  25. Was there ever any explanation on why that guy named his company “fraud guarantee?” Is he bad at English or was it some sort of a honey trap for mobsters?
×
×
  • Create New...