Orca of Peace

yes, i joined a FB group and went to a meeting. They looked like losers. Not that I hate them, since I vote Democrat always, but I can't support their tactics.

better to be voted out though. I doubt any of the antifa/ street rebels ever vote.

potential for a gang-bang porno

most people don't realize what Israel is doing in the West Bank. For example, "administrative detention" without trial or charge, which can be extended forever. 972 mag is run by liberal Jews https://972mag.com/israel-sent-an-average-of-29-palestinians-a-month-to-admin-detention-last-year/136890/ Israel sent an average of 29 Palestinians a month to admin. detention last year As of May 2018, 440 Palestinians were being held in Israeli prisons without charge or trial, according to new data. Administrative detention orders can be renewed indefinitely, without any way for the prisoner to defend themselves in court. By Yael Marom Illustrative photo of Israeli soldiers arresting a Palestinian man in the southern West Bank, June 23, 2018. (Wisam Hashlamoun/Flash90) Israeli authorities sent an average of 29 Palestinians a month to prison without charge or trial last year, according to new data provided by the Israel Prison service to B’Tselem. Over the past decade there was not a single month in which Israel held fewer than 150 Palestinians in administrative detention. According to the data, as of May 2018, Israel was imprisoning 440 people in administrative detention, without charge or trial, among them two women and three minors. By +972 Blog | June 24, 2018 Three of those people being held in administrative detention are currently on hunger strike, according to the Palestinian Prisoners’ Club. One of them, 30-year-old Hassan Shuka, has reportedly been on hunger strike for 54 days. Another administrative detainee, Mahmoud Iyad, has reportedly been on hunger strike for 22 days, and a third, Anas Shadid, for nine days. Administrative detention is a practice which Israel uses to detain Palestinians (and occasionally some Jews) without charge or trial — indefinitely. Administrative detention orders are reviewed every six months, but the detainees are not told of what crimes they are being accused or shown the evidence against them. The result is that it is virtually impossible to defend oneself against an administrative detention order. Under international law, administrative detention should only be used in the most extreme cases. In most modern legal systems, police or prosecutors release suspects when they don’t have enough evidence to charge them with a crime. In Israel, especially when the suspect is Palestinian, prosecutors and security forces find other ways to keep them behind bars. Several years ago, at the height of mass hunger strikes by Palestinian prisoners, a senior Israeli security official confirmed that the state uses administrative detention in many cases out of laziness and when it just hadn’t bothered to collect enough evidence. Then-public security minister Yitzhak Aharonovich recommended to security officials at the time that administrative detention be used “only if there is a need and not in all cases,” an implicit admission that the practice was being applied in far more cases than the exceptional, extreme circumstances in which international law permits its use.

i found this video to be highly entertaining, with "zombie apocalypse" and other similar metaphors

that makes it terrorism

too much violence. I don't like Trump but this is getting out of hand.

nice guy, class act, good job good effort Morey

he was a real estate developer salesman/pitchman for the Arizona mosque. This is all social and political satire. Candid Camera did the same thing 50 years ago, theirs was more situational comedy by practical jokes.

Blink 182 lmao

f'n hilarious, but I do feel sorry for people who wasted their time to come there. "Tell me about your dream mosque". although I didn't see much 'scary' about it. Did you guys see the one with Guns for Toddlers? Even got some Congressmen to agree. Now THAT is something scary. It's really really sad how naive and gullible the bulk of the population happens to be, how easily manipulated , in this land of free education, so much information for free, and immense wealth. We really are no better than the illiterate dumbfuks of poor nations.

melo is goign to be on the CNN political show this Saturday night.

the IDF Is ultra dominant, so there is zero need for US troop involvement.

Jerusalem Post was quoted by zerohedge. Here is the Jerusalem Post link , Clark says US troops are ready to die for Israel (as if the ultra dominant IDF needs any help) https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Juniper-Cobra-begins-with-US-and-IDF-troops-simulating-missile-attacks-544598 Washington and Israel have signed an agreement which would see the US come to assist Israel with missile defense in times of war and, according to Haimovitch, “I am sure once the order comes we will find here US troops on the ground to be part of our deployment and team to defend the State of Israel.”And those US troops who would be deployed to Israel, are prepared to die for the Jewish state, Clark said.“We are ready to commit to the defense of Israel and anytime we get involved in a kinetic fight there is always the risk that there will be casualties. But we accept that – as every conflict we train for and enter, there is always that possibility,” he said. US and IDF train for casualties here :

US General says American soldiers are ready to die for Israel ----------- https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-19/top-us-general-says-american-troops-should-be-ready-die-israel US Third Air Force Commander Lt. Gen. Richard Clark spelled out just such a scenario wherein US troops could be asked to fight and to die for defense of America Israel - even to the point of being placed under Israeli commanders responsible for battlefield decision making. And those US troops who would be deployed to Israel, are prepared to die for the Jewish state, Clark said."We are ready to commit to the defense of Israel anytime we get involved in a kinetic fight there is always the risk that there will be casualties. But we accept that - as every conflict we train for and enter, there is always that possibility," he said.

US military has been in Israel for decades, even sometimes operating the Patriot anti missile system

the UN peacekeepers would be hugging the Gaza fence on the Pal side, not deep inside Gaza itself where the hobby lobby rockets are fired. The UN would basically protect Gaza protestors from being murdered, that would be their sole purpose.

terror condoms

that's a good point about US troops, If US troops were stationed on the Gaza border and 30,000 protestors showed up one day, I doubt US troops would be murdereing medics, journalists, 14 yo boys, shooting guys in wheelchairs etc etc. US troops would be much better behaved.

your friend Arafat accepted Israel around 1988 or 1993 , can't remember. So has the PLO to this day and in fact cooperates with Israel on many issues. The occupation denial is almost as wacky as the other denial. Winning something in battle doesn't mean you have it if the occupied poeple don't want you.. that's the definition of ccupation. Denial!

this is a very sensible plan

the recent and ongoing Gaza massacre where 65 were killed in one day where another 1200 were shot but didn't die. for 51 years they have taken it

UN peacekeepers is the perfect idea to protect the Arab civilian population from massacre by the IDF.

ethnic cleansing isn't always extermination, more commonly it's expulsion. I was watching a WW2 doc last week where many Germans were expelled from other nations back to Germany in 1946, thousands were murdered but the vast majority were simply made to walk or railwayed back.

from 2016, a poll showed 48%. I saw a more current poll somewhere that its more than 50% now. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/pew-almost-half-of-israeli-jews-back-transfer-or-expulsion-of-arabs-1.5414660 One of the questions in the survey, based on face-to-face interviews of 5,601 individuals, asked to what degree they agreed with the following statement: “Arabs should be expelled or transferred from Israel.” The result, among the Jewish respondents: Twenty-one percent “strongly agree” and 27 percent “mostly agree.” If those two groups are combined, about half of Israeli Jews questioned – 48 percent – support transfer of Arab citizens. On the other hand, a similar proportion – 46 percent – say they oppose such a move, with 29 percent saying that they “don’t really agree” and 17 percent responding that they “don’t agree at all” to the expulsion of Arabs