same as some others. had the uber app first and never bothered to get the lyft app. wife only rolls with uber black, so that's what we get most of the time. if i'm solo, i will use some the cheaper options, but nothing is as consistent as getting an uber black SUV. I am a tall dude and the back seats of most cars suck ass.
appreciate your perspective. i have not walked a mile in your shoes and yes, schools are trending (more) anti gay and are taking away and preventing existing measures to provide aid, acceptance or common decency for gay students. i just posted what i saw as the underlying facts because the headline was a little misleading wrt to the mechanics of what was going on. it does not make it any less of an attack on the gay community. I hope my post was not taken as support of the policy.
to be fair, i don't think they are prohibiting lgbtq kids from getting food/school lunches. The aim is to get explicit protection for lgbtq kids
if the school is receiving USDA funding. this would get rolled up under title 9. headline is a little misleading in that it suggests schools are taking food away from kids because of their sexual orientation.
this seems like a better article explaining it https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/equality/3478940-usda-launches-initiative-to-combat-discrimination-against-lgbtq-people-in-accessing-nutrition-programs/
predictably, GQP is pushing back on offering explicit protections for lgbtq kids (while still providing lunches and such equally to all kids)