Jump to content

gurt

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by gurt

  1. I'm afraid that it won't matter if we do stop the run. Frankly, I kind of expect the theme to be that we stop the run, get them in 3rd and long but still get torched through the air. As the game goes on I expect them to default to the passing game until we prove we can stop it, which we have not been able to do consistently since OU.
  2. I'm kinda sick of the 'it doesn't work 100% of the time so we'd better never try' mindset of OL portal recruiting our staff has. The 995er mouthpieces are clearly regurgitating the feeling from the coaches, despite there being plenty of examples to the contrary. Hell, it worked for us with Calvin Anderson and Parker Braun under Herman. We'd kill for a Parker Braun right now.
  3. We got pretty well shredded by Florida and Kentucky as well. Outside of OU we’ve been bad against the pass in conference play.
  4. I’ll believe it when I see it from Sark
  5. The line did magically get better by not having Brooks or Stroh out there. That was the best pocket we’ve had all year by far.
  6. Pass D is in full blown crisis
  7. It’s just you
  8. I’m not saying anything about sex, you weirdo. You’re the one with the low estimation of women if you think Nicole can’t defend her own posts. She doesn’t need you here to defend her honor.
  9. I'm not absolving Sark of any of the blame, I just think you are claiming to have insider info in order to gain attention on the internet.
  10. what has she said that ctj didn't say?
  11. Nicole claims to have insider information but just conveniently can't speak about any of it and also just rehashes what others have already thrown out there as true. "oh yes, my source is saying the same thing".
  12. its laughable that any of ya'll think Nicole has any inside info
  13. This game will come down to if we can keep them from grinding the clock. They like to go on time churning, 10-15 play drives that take up half a quarter. With our inefficient offense we can't let that happen. I would prefer we be ultra aggressive on D and if we give up a long score, so be it.
  14. The linebackers are generally pretty terrible in zone as well. They cover grass not receivers. Lefau in particular had a bad game yesterday with meaningless coverage drops and poor angles.
  15. It’s a quibble when compared to the state of the Offense, but it’s starting to become a worrying trend how we’re playing pass defense. The dreaded off coverage from the corners gave up such easy slants and curls and we played way too much man coverage. There were plays were they threw a short hitch or bubble screen and the safety was so late they picked up a long first down. Feels like early years PK mixed with Akina inability to teach zone.
  16. Our problem was mostly that our critical vendor were also down so us failing over meant we were up but the customer still wouldn’t be able to fully use our software for its intended purpose. We have had customers asking us why we don’t have multi cloud…which I’m hoping they are ok with their contract being double what it currently is bc that’s what it would take to pull off that nightmare.
  17. Yeah it is clear that they have way too much going on in their heads on any given play. Another sign pointing to Sark thinking he can run things like an NFL team when he is working with 19 year olds. Slide protections, pull protections, half run half pass protections. Its all too much. Just run BOB and some half-slide until we can prove we can execute those.
  18. We’ll miss him bad against vandy
  19. you don't think that our offense got manhandled by Kentucky? You run a great website but you don't know shit about football.
  20. What? They didn’t play that well at all.
  21. That’s why it won’t happen, not why it shouldn’t happen. And you’re right, it won’t. But it’s more fun to argue over why it should on the internet.
  22. Also, Sark he completely lost his reputation as a qb guru and offensive genius already so what difference does it make?
  23. So your position is that it is more important to preserve the very slim odds of the idealized scenario working out next year over trying to win games now? You’re scenario is completely hypothetical. I want to see what we might be able to do now. If Caldwell proves he can’t do any better after the next couple games, you go back to Arch. This also sends the message (which is long overdue) that positions are earned, not ordained.
  24. He didn’t decide to suck, but he still does
  25. The post game presser tells all. Complete lack of introspection, burying his head in the sand, saying “it’s the little things”, saying it was a culture win, etc. There’s an air of him acting like this is the way he wants it to be, it just needs a few tweaks.
×
×
  • Create New...